This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 9d77a2b749 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards d62c787515 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 49771208be 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards f81d1e4ef4 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards aaa59a1fb3 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 8b8dbe5a2a 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards f857f2e5c6 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 9544f3df51 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 052fe47405 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 8477821afe 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 639ac91331 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 0fd6ed2f2e 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 92fbf93521 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 7b8dbc9f48 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards c2ec5e7005 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 77a4e0964e 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards b1303fe1a0 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 443dcdca7f 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards e4f5d448b0 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0bd4156439 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 64204eac96 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 5fe60151c9 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards da5543f54e 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 6c2fdcc4bf 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 98227c4aed 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards fae1f05759 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards e805950bc8 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 244c694239 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards ecd54ec70f 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5aa13b68a4 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9dda6e286f 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 9dcd13843f 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards fdc074db4c 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 771725cb58 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards c9154c768c 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 30b2089bfe 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards e35fdd1467 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards ea4eb23670 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 050dd7cba1 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 70ab0910f4 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards f3d29cdd90 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards b06ef2cc7e 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards afc334b798 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d75c34dd17 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards f6c4365700 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 03c60d8958 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards a1d8a5aba7 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 242e3d8961 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards 45348a5619 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 332a090ca9 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d3e6a282fe 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ccc4b29db3 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards e35f8d8296 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards c51b1ab7aa 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards d6ef3a664d 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards 3ee86d2f13 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards 8d6d29fc9e 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 0d91a70654 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards d578553e3c 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards eb453f1468 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards c30f593e7a 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 3fcdc200f1 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards e7a4239a08 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards 4447f46150 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 23f5182501 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards e47664de23 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards f5a5c7d57f 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 1bc2d1d6ff 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards 3488a1eae5 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b21a87f76b 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 44bd68904e 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 44d5ac7fc8 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards a053bf3008 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 4065b59710 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 06e20a25fc 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 527059dc8e 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 5b9863ed25 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 4a58e9603a 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f08238e715 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 0e4248ac9f 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 39485ae3a2 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 6445cd6cca 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 4807e9efe2 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 703b54cc1d 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 1a35051bae 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards 903d16f56b 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards af0d199fd4 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 0c0375f28c 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 1e73dc61cb 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards ddace66e51 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards eb6401a8a0 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards 35c9ef04db 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards cb32a5423f 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards c3a9ef7c35 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards b8115f0d58 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 238f68ad3a 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards bb9c8d205e 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 465188a9f9 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 868df80ed4 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards ada2476f5c 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 252b930009 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 8b6d78ffd3 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 9e4de62dbe 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new b69c9b7321 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 897114321c 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 0fd2cfab9c 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new bced0f8610 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new b987cce301 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d908444f1d 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 53bbef9ccb 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new de3f1e456a 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 8ebaf8a654 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new f571c06bbb 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 82041c3df0 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new c97425ec74 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new a7699ab634 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new 0bd30664a3 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 81c7650ee5 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 60cd299f29 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new fdf84c9097 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 01924e48b1 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 1593b305dd 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 3ddff02eb8 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8aa716a1a7 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 2f67784a47 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new b8e3129015 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new d97fc135cf 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new d832493f55 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new fd594f6936 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 3dcd1c46b4 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 5af951a8c2 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 17531562f1 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 02b27cdd79 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new 890f13b80a 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 071b5d693f 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 6550cfd779 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new e038c165b5 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new 0d6fb02a2a 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new f1a6d17a3b 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 585163f13f 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1315d42018 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 21084a34f5 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new 4dda60766a 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new e36e0bef3a 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new e3f4890aca 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new 3cab91cadb 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new a507a8a058 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 2a5fb14df9 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 82c37cff96 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 407db3eea8 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6d6ae969dd 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new ba5fbeb433 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 8ab467ee0f 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new 19d9e94a7a 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 5fca3f1bd3 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new b49a219081 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new 3662522621 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 3e54a7eb4e 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d8d196e047 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 11248a7af5 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 66f3594868 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new 48738c49bd 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 690566a99c 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new d057c681ca 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new c2aa8cf0ba 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new b0f22858c6 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new cc8837a87e 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new 12f0cf3f8d 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 0354a83429 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new b3103d1cca 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new dff82af28a 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 38a5c0c18e 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 427ad17f48 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new f545900b11 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new cfbf8b77e3 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 3e9f90a273 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 3432c5348f 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0f7bcc45c8 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 6dadab1d34 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new d9a0eb9768 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new 5869b3ee9d 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new 8f06b75fe7 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new df0acdfb9f 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new b35b17e529 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 765aafce57 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ce2cf19c06 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ef19473721 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 0d05059d86 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 29f3c6ebbd 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 9391b0242c 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c517f3fa30 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new d295c4b9d0 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 33c9bce4d4 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 5778332927 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 9fd50e2129 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 415b7f7217 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 61f7619163 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 01e81bb3d5 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 00bc2dd507 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 244456bfcd onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 4e1e814bc6 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (9d77a2b749) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2352 -> 2372 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2664 -> 2640 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28476 -> 27252 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17956 -> 17692 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 91648 -> 90788 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 70272 -> 70636 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7876 -> 8612 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 235320 -> 233832 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185968 -> 186128 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 216564 -> 213536 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 180812 -> 179916 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 180 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 178 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4172 -> 4192 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 185 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 17324 -> 6844 bytes .../output-bmk-results/diff-bmk-results.out | 2 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 2 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 0 .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 2 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 0 git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- manifest.sh | 32 +- results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff | 1 - results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 122 - results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3047 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3313 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 723183 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 737177 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28840 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3033 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3332 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 739014 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 742159 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28868 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 70 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3538 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 257 +- .../csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff | 0 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 257 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 141 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 257 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4060 +- results_id | 2 +- 51 files changed, 1526711 insertions(+), 1494941 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/diff-bmk-results.out delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff