This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-aarch64-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-aarch64-master-O3_LTO.

discards c59a15e9 onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2c23e0da onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 57c5dc35 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 4c9c900e onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards efc13120 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1b3b1e14 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 85638367 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0ed77707 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d8e499cc onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 4e3dfd4a onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 553fd6e1 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c287fd33 onsuccess: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards aa005e77 onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 48dd637c onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 59024b30 onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards eb59f9a5 onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 933a7547 force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 01318481 force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards bd3842a4 90: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 136d7573 89: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 238ead5c 88: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3e576545 87: force: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 09f9659e 86: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c08add3f 85: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards eb3921da 84: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8dbc5aba 83: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 13426686 82: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ce64fd20 81: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9e38567c 80: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards bae71f9f 79: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 26f2b204 78: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d2585709 77: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 26f0aa34 76: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d3d9d144 75: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards aafcabf7 74: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2a7c2fc9 73: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 1257 commits discards 59e9f8be 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 285 commits discards 9bfe4fe8 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits discards 15abbe5d 70: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] discards 612828a6 69: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench slowed down by 5% a [...] discards f2169493 68: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 454 commits discards 78a22e25 67: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 216 commits discards c1683c3e 66: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 391 commits discards 6a5db740 65: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 159 commits discards 1bdc71dd 64: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 487 commits discards ef2050b5 63: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 711 commits discards 12587df1 62: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0050387f 61: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0058c919 60: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d92400fc 59: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a5c3fd59 58: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 18882cb9 57: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 718cbf4c 56: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 7c1b10d6 55: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards c407490d 54: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc: [...] discards ac047d86 53: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -5% [...] discards ea5074b1 52: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 4f4e6f15 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards d6af9eeb 50: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 7876a8ff 49: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards b33e3919 48: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/llvm [...] discards df06fcb2 47: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3e8c8ad3 46: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6e605ac6 45: onsuccess: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII speeds up by -4% [...] discards 24efe46d 44: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fdf261cd 43: onsuccess: #509: 1: [TCWG CI] 470.lbm speeds up by -11% a [...] discards c6f46446 42: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards bfccee76 41: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 8cdbb95f 40: onsuccess: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] discards 9546800b 39: onsuccess: #502: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 340edff1 38: onsuccess: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng speeds up by -5% [...] discards 3c544d02 37: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc run OK after binuti [...] discards 802d7220 36: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits discards 221ef908 35: force: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to run after wor [...] discards f702f361 34: force: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 191 commits discards a5d00c00 33: onsuccess: #493: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3ec820f6 32: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 062d2523 31: onsuccess: #490: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 895c0539 30: onsuccess: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 96d70479 29: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 54fd4952 28: onsuccess: #486: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b89d3da9 27: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 28ffe3ed 26: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4b115824 25: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c5be9cba 24: onsuccess: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0a13731a 23: onsuccess: #470: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK [...] discards d803997a 22: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 37d8522d 21: onsuccess: #468: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards bed639bf 20: onsuccess: #466: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 7c89485d 19: onsuccess: #464: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 125 commits discards d589c4c3 18: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build afte [...] discards 7ac9ab5f 17: force: #462: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 95 commits discards a4ab9775 16: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-16-init [...] discards a5f30c76 15: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 117 commits discards dfce80b7 14: onsuccess: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2c01f20e 13: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] discards b5e6bf78 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards aa79ffbf 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 4dbcb084 10: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards b0dadbce 9: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/glibc [...] discards a55ddd07 8: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/gl [...] new 8e48558a onsuccess: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 46403b22 9: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/glibc [...] new 76332989 10: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 3d5d4e7e 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 5a93efca 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 5a8537fe 13: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] new bd3bb51f 14: onsuccess: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f6c05cea 15: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 117 commits new bc5b09d8 16: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-16-init [...] new 1d2af3ee 17: force: #462: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 95 commits new 90b374d0 18: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build afte [...] new 1136bfe9 19: onsuccess: #464: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 125 commits new 72c3e80e 20: onsuccess: #466: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 0f4f7043 21: onsuccess: #468: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e91817fb 22: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 96103329 23: onsuccess: #470: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK [...] new 1310bfea 24: onsuccess: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 49e0e2a3 25: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c3aeb627 26: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 32eba67c 27: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e6157b68 28: onsuccess: #486: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 90bd72f2 29: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5ffa8be7 30: onsuccess: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 879ffdd6 31: onsuccess: #490: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3c94ba26 32: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a0f00984 33: onsuccess: #493: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c7a09a93 34: force: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 191 commits new 0a4a91d6 35: force: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to run after wor [...] new 5fdca5a7 36: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits new 02045e0d 37: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc run OK after binuti [...] new 2dd576cb 38: onsuccess: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng speeds up by -5% [...] new 0fa91755 39: onsuccess: #502: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c5cd7096 40: onsuccess: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] new e48a6acb 41: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new bf9834d2 42: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new 0e7b5f2f 43: onsuccess: #509: 1: [TCWG CI] 470.lbm speeds up by -11% a [...] new 0ff3de0d 44: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 42b9f024 45: onsuccess: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII speeds up by -4% [...] new a5cf9d54 46: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ac14c0d9 47: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 106de54d 48: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/llvm [...] new 2e578d9b 49: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 7d097bdc 50: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new e5b617f3 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new be504bb8 52: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 2c8ed41c 53: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -5% [...] new 6bf4865e 54: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc: [...] new 69e59579 55: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new d9937c91 56: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new cf75facc 57: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0cc4883f 58: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 928ce3cf 59: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 43fc9657 60: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new cae2563e 61: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 40170a77 62: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1ca00340 63: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 711 commits new 47d1bfe8 64: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 487 commits new 3d9ed79d 65: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 159 commits new 7f27f74d 66: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 391 commits new 148add4d 67: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 216 commits new 733edea3 68: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 454 commits new 5e645b12 69: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench slowed down by 5% a [...] new 02845bba 70: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] new ec44d732 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits new b941f6fe 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 285 commits new 8c627148 73: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 1257 commits new 297b6cbc 74: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 640c1738 75: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3f464023 76: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f59e30cd 77: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c01c1d96 78: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 836a2861 79: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new dc276a31 80: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 76eb47fe 81: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new db1e75a2 82: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 680f45fe 83: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4c7109fb 84: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6dbd48f2 85: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 0d0f6b38 86: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5e6cf506 87: force: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0349bdde 88: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b2470c6f 89: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6b11567a 90: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f6059043 force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new 886ea1fe force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new 41c06a86 onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 06b101c3 onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 392140c9 onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3049b961 onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new fe13795a onsuccess: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 68310619 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3f7b2524 onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 67cb8ff3 onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b64f6055 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 77e39c0b onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f0cb7b16 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 111b9c48 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 71efd024 onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1f3f9f49 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5ee2afd9 onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a98f7af0 onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (c59a15e9) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: