This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.

discards 756393d0 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 64d3fdb6 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards abb7d509 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 4250b588 onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a8454788 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 29bfb7e4 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 1e503d4c 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 90725931 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 83c196c4 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 343db0e6 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7c5341fe 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 23ff8948 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 4905f644 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] discards 9507daa9 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] discards 360079ad 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards c74d4bdd 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 379b0b96 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7335f0b7 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 6e090dd7 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 525b3031 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 60bc420a 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b6609120 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f84c9552 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits discards 879a3e03 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] discards 7e17570b 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits discards 145bda1f 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards bad1c999 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards d2e9f342 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 7550fe77 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards ee0ff346 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards b1767148 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits discards fbaedcbc 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 876fd070 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 4cd08e35 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards c4473827 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 26a090b0 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] discards ac7f863f 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 33138203 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9261b928 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 31d56046 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ff3ba272 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8db7441c 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] discards dff5ff5c 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards 01e3af5c 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits discards 36649e5f 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] discards 3c80e421 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits discards d1a8e575 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 42f8f7c4 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 7acd982a 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards d31b2507 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits discards 73eb4ea8 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 8acf19e7 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits discards cf85f106 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c5afca94 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 833d717e 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7133737c 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 7140afba 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5bd249b2 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7f8146ea 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] discards 8f095a74 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits discards 4d79ee67 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards 2ba063db 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 083b254a 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits discards bdf1c8b0 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3a0d3017 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0d1270ed 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] discards 74639462 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits discards 211f140d 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...] discards 59564555 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits discards ca8b5cfb 5: onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK a [...] discards 4aa7d8b3 4: onsuccess: #349: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 1565 commits discards ce871980 3: force: #348: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build after [...] discards 7a222410 2: force: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng:[.] std_eval slowed do [...] discards ac971fd3 1: onsuccess: #345: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 591c00e4 onsuccess: #345: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 92b03764 2: force: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng:[.] std_eval slowed do [...] new 022f33d5 3: force: #348: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build after [...] new 47f6bc72 4: onsuccess: #349: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 1565 commits new 1d464742 5: onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK a [...] new d0a63b55 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits new 84f54919 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...] new 550773b1 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits new c6466a96 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] new caf7841d 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c58d74cf 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 98681163 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits new eb51605a 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f43c8000 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 2c8deb29 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits new 45990ac9 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] new 9d38331d 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 52d08fb0 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5d1fcfab 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 6487effc 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9799c96e 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 9c931f21 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f1b47d5f 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits new de6870c5 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] new f9fd6f1c 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits new 82196cfa 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new ce6695ee 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 7693f57d 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 20b88f58 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits new 969f5807 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] new 2e58ccc5 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits new 12cb9b01 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new 2a33ed8a 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] new 1a0a3f44 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 19994dbe 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0a8d3852 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8876181c 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1edbfecd 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4a2bdf6d 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] new f962c88f 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 03bc66ec 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 0558c8af 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 27b519a1 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 5fc10eff 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits new 52358138 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 2ea42de3 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 9a74a681 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new e2c3733d 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 4cbe7275 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new f0896100 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits new 527a6d7b 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] new 4af1b153 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits new 907ec5f2 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 71b93154 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5a413d1b 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new fc9d8aad 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e3182100 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ff266644 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8b10d200 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 924af8b1 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f9b08f92 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] new a0641930 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] new 27338b51 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 102f2a90 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e7dc3514 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 55b29e6f 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 996f6b66 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f56a36f5 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 45b01a31 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f338e0bc onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ce3d8002 onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a8a74775 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 94012608 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 12496817 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (756393d0) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 74 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: