This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards 43591c720 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 9cced7b8a onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards bf0ee1298 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 1268e4e15 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c919024f8 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 06825cca9 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 88114e9f1 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2af8c529e onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5058ee468 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9a159389e onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0ca5b544b 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards dd37900ae 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 52c7b9713 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 89dda5aea 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards cec7f0343 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards eb48e3443 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ff5425ed7 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards fa9b3343e 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8834d0147 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 1f129029d 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 954088ff4 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 55be1f842 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f446e483b 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b6e6e5f00 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3057b77d0 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 04430b3af 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 6bde949d7 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 757fbbaff 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 4a737f56e 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 1417af232 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards bd850687e 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 57e4e4d13 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards b664197ef 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 279bf37cc 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards b0b1512b2 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 76ed93eab 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards d2c47fa06 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards b22db4569 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 9417024e6 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 902f6a777 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 8d5abc3e5 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards c42a2e001 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 2f80e4999 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 54ec29e7f 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 12e2b934c 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards b653ffcc5 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards e71c9ade8 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 90bf98ead 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards df04767fd 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards a59c9dad3 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 9f86b462e 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 631a4d47c 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 1e0c01c69 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 4790231b3 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 42de1fe62 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards b4f30bd2c 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards e569a0ad1 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 6e928626c 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 02a719b36 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 42a350e03 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards aeff9700c 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 6fb76f0b5 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 16beaf4e2 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 87b9ed365 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards b42881fc2 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 3275ad536 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 742c0c78b 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 0bcfef0c0 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards a61e2226d 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 322f4cae5 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 6ca4072d4 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 992fe9052 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards cf9c477cf 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards f634562de 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards a921e091b 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards a5c407b06 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards a59cc86ca 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 8ee26a89c 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 3e0b377be 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards d4c1d68c6 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 92eea3bd3 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 62de22e74 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 81383fe73 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 265ca1f6d 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d842c6445 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 349869495 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards f7eb3adef 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards c06203651 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 8281c0992 onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 4e6f4feee 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new f074f4ec3 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 64cdf3e6e 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 520faa7e9 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b9ab15fa8 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 707ca160a 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 68922478f 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 80714da46 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c9350ca0a 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 752e1b0b4 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 61527d33c 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 0b32af138 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new e5d41ca20 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 9505f650f 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 295103f25 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new ddea3bdad 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 4ebc5ba10 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 9d5b3d244 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 5afe4e370 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 1618f03c1 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new bb1ae9eb5 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new aa6495abb 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 732f3cc4a 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new dd4b34bdd 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 0639c2773 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 0efeaf94a 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b5da7a2c0 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new c76a5f60d 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new f86dac98f 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 658c3cf98 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 6192df94d 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 22b4c4ecf 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b5c97ef0b 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 5f55f2cb1 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 8546d1829 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new e5446e3ba 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2c73d919c 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new ef9200345 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new fa45bd46c 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 23394cbb6 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 2d587f0ca 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new a070d435d 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 272ad5145 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new fe6209e50 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4c6096e7b 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ee10ef940 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 6245bc4c4 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new baf9270bc 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new ddcee9395 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new c4bac7218 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 4d8c337b8 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 3301b0f94 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new e2d4fa6e4 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new ea07bfd01 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 77b47c5da 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 0acd74196 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 4d6c9419f 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new d72b99871 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new e1bd9e9a1 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 21306dfd9 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 99a8371a9 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new c896c0d73 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 066f231f1 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 961c6244f 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a6dd4b046 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 188191ca5 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 92210adf0 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8892c891e 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d5f8f72d4 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8718b170e 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9634eaf3e 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d2ae04a05 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2eac421a5 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new bb79c706c 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new f76592395 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3d84ae9fd 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7390c94ee 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 755fa7274 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6501036a7 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cad03d0f9 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new df187a9b3 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d45adc15c onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8cdba332f onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8042557fb onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new bcd225edd onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 0711d2c52 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new a3a3b2758 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (43591c720) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 88 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: