This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 596a2e59579 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards f6d8830353c 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 285da959e12 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 8b8768ebc42 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 89993b00783 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards ea445bb2ab5 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards bae10192588 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 543f35dcceb 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards a302e76402e 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 01609ba21cf 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards c3533e59b32 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 86f6f956a9f 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards a202db8752d 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards c3218ce346c 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards 6c9466c254b 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] discards 91477a454ef 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9a653bda493 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 0bc7929bd5f 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 2fc7e03eadc 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1be8b459d7f 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 362e5c86208 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 4e997069c17 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards 4625631131e 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16 [...] discards d20c1b81c93 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards c2568b4ae70 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] discards 4c844113a9d 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 248cfae7d46 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 169 [...] discards b6950107509 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 2f5ff1b40fd 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards d3fe8577e7c 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19 [...] discards 31c347f773b 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 161d5d44060 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11 [...] discards 624289d55b9 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 1dc8a7e579e 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 669fe8983d8 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 08b176a5455 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards 0166c763450 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 96827c07c1d 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 0105608cc0c 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2cb57957488 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] discards 3df32454e48 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards ca5b9944595 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 15c82d0cefc 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0dc17a0449c 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 3b2bed500ae 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards f0433842196 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards 6c283553242 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 328d4b3da98 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 2138b436311 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards abb2015f95c 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] discards 60eec4c9d22 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 5bafdd98525 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 091d7107a8a 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.900 [...] discards 05b6ed1d67c 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards eeb3a4fa309 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards afe1554b309 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 423f51e86e6 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 9fa940e3455 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 296a369eb0c 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 73fea491378 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards f8d71e2344f 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards b6d4b4c4458 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] discards 60fa980aae6 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5d9287cab2e 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 7ffa3201f01 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 51e32c26db6 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.3 [...] discards f67ee5403ba 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK [...] discards 2c2b708060a 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 58a60b06ba9 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 9a4c375f388 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 4d6e30fed3a 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check [...] discards 9ae5b5ad744 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards f82affe8bd5 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards b5c0a086923 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 50c071a93da 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 67dea662425 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 73a91ed1856 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 9b64c694619 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 525e684c2fe 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 2b2962d71a9 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 6d534653710 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 43013297ed7 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 8c07afa9e64 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] discards c57250374a2 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards e51d2e8497d 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] discards 65bfabd56b5 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards 8f796ff356b 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 48c6ca72466 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards c2b1e8747e4 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards a6680ec1290 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards b55952482f6 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards b3ea758f54c 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 5985b8b3dd8 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 12 [...] discards f7fcdee07e9 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 [...] discards 25490eb9d4d 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by [...] discards 887dbb96d80 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 05305ab6751 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards c9e83a645c2 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 59685d7b28b 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14 [...] discards e121775acaa 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed d [...] discards 8e4ecdf6325 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% aft [...] new 96d9ab1bcb0 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% aft [...] new c62520c9def 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed d [...] new 875fd57fa84 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14 [...] new ee19092e7b7 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 57927e8bc7f 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 6c202ea4aa3 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 9d47b297bfa 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by [...] new 90ef3804c85 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 [...] new 6733540cdcf 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 12 [...] new 554b189da1a 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 2ce0e4ccb7d 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 0003d783907 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new cf8e08ed876 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 695598d31dc 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new 564390cafc8 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 1287e5165fa 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new 4e4e6579e45 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] new a8b80ea64d9 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new 09746b8e121 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] new 717b7a0fda0 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 941ca538e16 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new b7366a8096c 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 4dd585da08c 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 7dac800cccc 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new 70ac320093d 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 1dc6e28ec64 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 0231a79a347 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 59f915c7978 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new ff5e22e9175 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new fe6e612d311 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 2ad8ec06ddb 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check [...] new 2c8c1710882 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 32b1583dca0 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 7385aff3ff8 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 48647bbb10c 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK [...] new dcd1843c818 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.3 [...] new f0b902e1a41 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new e101eec80b1 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new f4601c2c71f 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a6e1a11f76a 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] new 0586e6ccdfe 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new d8387069a6c 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 448dc77111e 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new 2cb1c5e5a02 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 3fc18c30ec3 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 09188106ab5 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 90288f9f2f7 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 1bea4795d88 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new a2314ccecfc 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.900 [...] new e0e040c4655 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new d4ab8c41044 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 154528b1280 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] new 9628f6e00b4 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 28bf798e365 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new 136c280c152 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 0a390bf19ed 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 5129e8365a4 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 6da4f035a9c 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 57f7193d9bc 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 44190fe63ee 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5946f3b1fb3 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 3ee8e1380d2 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] new a9168d197f5 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 176eb903b9c 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 5d8507a68a7 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 13f48c4b5c0 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 6cb7c59b0c0 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 7fe93a15e41 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 983b0f34ef0 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 848d1d0cadd 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11 [...] new b6deedf459a 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 432b123521f 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19 [...] new 5e56389c9f7 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 04afca004ef 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 62a68990018 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 169 [...] new db65ff9bdea 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new a5d6fa96a60 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] new dc7af958f13 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new 1a4378badca 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16 [...] new f50ef515700 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new 63d69e2dca0 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 988cb0d985f 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 53610602ac9 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2fb3eda8fee 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 26d46877b61 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 93710b4c2fb 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0401beb52ee 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] new fa2c92a0209 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new 1227d42adff 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 82b1f743ed0 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new fe6c6190bc3 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 4416e2d9e32 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 75609f25b1f 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new a254daf9e9a 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new dd12af326a0 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 9bb77d66e65 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 7fcf569ae1c 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 843a4753cef 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 815ae5e4091 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 519f31be45b 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 72c37702dbd 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 090dc9176c9 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (596a2e59579) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 1940 -> 2172 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2436 -> 2492 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27176 -> 27368 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 89984 -> 90660 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8532 -> 8560 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 232948 -> 233180 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 211548 -> 211900 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 158 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 156 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4132 -> 4080 bytes .../437.leslie3d.symbols-regression | 3 + 10-check_regression/464.h264ref.symbols-regression | 2 + 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 174 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 19616 -> 19468 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.improvement | 2 - 10-check_regression/exe.regression | 1 + 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 2 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 6 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 2 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 3 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 7 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 9 +- 10-check_regression/results.regressions | 6 + 10-check_regression/symbol.regression | 5 + 11-update_baseline/console.log | 52 +- mail/check-regression-status.txt | 2 +- mail/exe.improvement | 2 - mail/exe.regression | 1 + mail/symbol.regression | 5 + manifest.sh | 17 +- results | 6 + results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 234 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 28 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 28 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2795 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3337 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 47970 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 556223 ++++++------ results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 14014 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 282 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 120 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3212 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 248 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 248 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3924 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 239 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 29 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2514 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3220 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 806113 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 790622 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 17441 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 459 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2797 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3337 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 47970 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 556223 ++++++------ results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 14014 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 282 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 120 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3492 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4027 +- results_id | 2 +- 71 files changed, 1504574 insertions(+), 1382260 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/437.leslie3d.symbols-regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/464.h264ref.symbols-regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff create mode 100644 10-check_regression/results.regressions create mode 100644 10-check_regression/symbol.regression delete mode 100644 mail/exe.improvement create mode 100644 mail/exe.regression create mode 100644 mail/symbol.regression