This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards ac08ec2b6c 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1a7fc9b5ce 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 93b7b29b63 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 6ac985654d 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards b36f00cb8e 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 34d584dd7a 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 23ff8c03b7 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 0efe471d2e 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards 373707bfb0 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards bc9f931a90 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fcc5a62df0 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 4304b7f5b2 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards f90b883597 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a6df1638f3 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fc0a266d14 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards bd7cc4b2f8 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards 83ae3b086f 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards b8930e30bd 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards 6e8946413d 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 7bf0ec12cf 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 3b4dfb11b0 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] discards f0c38e519b 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards e692446c9f 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] discards 326231310b 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards e012687aa8 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 37003eb65b 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards ee12b4968f 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 02a6393c5a 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 07bf6f83c4 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards c682fa1662 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards bf689fb024 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 3e2626b78f 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 4bc6bb67ee 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 60e489aa53 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 948a4eb04d 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 5710a9b5ea 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6456299b8d 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 938c94d82b 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0a0d159baf 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 5913445b08 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards c440492583 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards a3ddfa1888 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 92a12a99f4 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards c7452bfa02 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 375ed909bb 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 1ff1641a0f 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards f0c4949215 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] discards eb4ec57898 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards c7a0553b82 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 595d634edd 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 2b099790fa 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards b9085b29ef 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards d8dcceda70 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 6535b2d60f 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 71f387dc2f 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards aa03390781 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 3c97e28ca7 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 04d20d25bb 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 22279178ac 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] discards fcef2e8b1b 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] discards 115a9e61f1 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] discards bbe2a3e441 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards a741cba7c8 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 5f0c4c6a6b 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 07cdf995fb 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] discards ea071f6474 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 1ffb01273c 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 525510be38 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0e58e71b02 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 639ddfec3d 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards b9ce5962d7 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 79f53e7afe 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 774674c86e 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 6034010f55 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 00f3e21b04 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e998620344 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards a21575536e 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 0202f55cc2 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards 1b081001dd 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 7789ffcd8f 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards 25c858e389 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2b3210e2be 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards cb4ec70397 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards c363aad6da 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards ec241cdb27 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9a07161579 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 0114860823 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] discards 0dca11df5d 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards b789cb56c2 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] discards 0adaed498c 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards fa2842beaa 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f7b8098a33 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b6d95798e5 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14% [...] discards b2c8aee081 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed do [...] discards 1c76801f03 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% afte [...] discards eece09a93f 6: force: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII built and run OK aft [...] discards ca2d81bab4 5: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp slowed down by 7% a [...] discards f04c2b9e83 4: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII failed to build afte [...] discards 1fa702de75 3: onsuccess: #456: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 7624 [...] discards 224858c379 2: onsuccess: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 564 commits discards fbe30cc995 1: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 31c0a4412e 1: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 0c799e7453 2: onsuccess: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 564 commits new 850a54107f 3: onsuccess: #456: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 7624 [...] new beeee2d0a4 4: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII failed to build afte [...] new a192d4fff4 5: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp slowed down by 7% a [...] new 77c622fbd9 6: force: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII built and run OK aft [...] new 1be4eebf67 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% afte [...] new a0a778d8c1 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed do [...] new c9405dd442 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14% [...] new b9bac82abf 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new dad13c5b72 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 493b5ed922 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 576fb3fb45 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] new dccfa295f7 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 45753feaa3 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new aa759768a2 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 6bc8a95180 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ef479bb548 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new 4b94e95116 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new fe3d3bbf39 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new 6d0a93e2bc 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c4401ceb6b 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new 6cf1d86b63 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 106df63290 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new 198b60e613 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new da2534405d 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 32ec67e6fe 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 957261ed58 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 35206d9781 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new e56ad8fd7f 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new 01a4f0a279 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 76af722dd4 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 37f4fae8f8 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 9c00124978 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 32a77c8f83 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 23c6e054cf 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 756da5aa63 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] new e51d92a422 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new e6f245d4f2 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new f7331af29a 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 490bc8caf4 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] new 8a0067272e 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] new e9c2dc4fd6 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] new 3d1f431fa1 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 675b759145 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new bbc8779146 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new c62d188338 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 025a49297f 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 4e277ef960 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 79f860a114 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 044840a88a 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new c0424151a0 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 515a843dd9 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new a2f667b3f7 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new b3faa087a8 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] new fdb177ae8f 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 45050b0d15 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new f7462736dc 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 6eacb71179 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 9b4b61beb4 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new d900fb3184 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new b89a4f3190 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 5f7851593e 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 3250a15715 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4d21773e13 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d9f8c681e2 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5b838fc075 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 2313819430 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 43256027c5 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new cbd106c0d1 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 7a2cc67686 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new ab63bcb427 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 3a722246c1 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 6e3c88e2a0 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new 0dc9e25442 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 2d77d46fc5 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new dcde11265e 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new a525e3711c 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new ae59e1aabb 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] new aa6cccff55 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 8a9cd6fdce 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] new 19f18aeb15 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 38589acf58 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new efed3e7605 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new fc137058b3 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new 53fa20a19c 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new b12395e944 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1b0454b299 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6f3de3a426 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2aa1fde3e5 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 128ce84964 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new bbae4ca580 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f2c73d76b9 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 7fa2132651 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new 42c4c78e19 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 5809937228 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new a8cba24f4a 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 651f88fe4c 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 56c5133c69 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new dc9410c33e 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 519e6fd492 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 24a35f14d4 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (ac08ec2b6c) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2040 -> 2028 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2420 -> 2436 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 26804 -> 27088 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 89828 -> 90380 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8396 -> 8368 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233648 -> 233188 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 211128 -> 211836 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 158 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 156 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4320 -> 4144 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 118 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 17936 -> 16468 bytes .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 11 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 9 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 72 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/notify.sh | 2 +- manifest.sh | 29 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 232 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 30 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 30 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2774 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3322 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 8732 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 574344 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 26706 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 456 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 134 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 66 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3175 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 246 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 246 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3976 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 240 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 10 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3089 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3363 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 23835 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 566263 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 26394 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 588 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2770 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3322 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 8732 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 574344 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 26706 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 456 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 134 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3463 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 250 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 250 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4050 +- results_id | 2 +- 59 files changed, 932082 insertions(+), 941281 deletions(-)