This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards 00b3ae30f onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 4ca6f3367 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards a6e2bbf7a onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 2008ac3b6 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 4f21215f9 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d5d25b028 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a52444a51 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 226ffef41 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e00d7fb05 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 60b2af038 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 39fe8e5bc 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 14e1f1cef 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f9eb643a8 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 3fd606ecb 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 1c928a59b 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 427ca872e 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a9e9b46fb 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3018dd7f3 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f6d9d1564 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 4fb617a0e 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e3f5f67fa 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6fa15a477 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 12625cffd 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 01e188313 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards c26f276c7 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards c952b14ba 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards b3698a9d8 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards e3aad92e8 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards e35957d01 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 78a338f07 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 58761967b 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 980b6ced6 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards fcd415362 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards e534a98da 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards f3f8a4fd0 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 281cffd23 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 679615851 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 0f14ef822 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 39643a5e6 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 3dcda3f7f 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards ec82a7b79 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards e1ef5ed96 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 388295a2c 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7f6db0b73 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 703ca61d5 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 9909dd7fd 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards beee0dae0 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards b96d1caa9 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards dfecf4401 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 43857e546 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 3cf8bb475 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards ef24cf61e 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 8ebfcf8ea 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards cefd29a77 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards e21ddfb05 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards dbb09742a 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards d3579f9fc 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 26b543b5d 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards a148bd86f 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 68956d621 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 6282889b0 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 2b06e12b0 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards cb581c9e3 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 9aeb9284f 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards d606445b6 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 5e24ac836 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 1bb1b5f01 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards c89198256 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards b00e30275 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 3660d09e6 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards f5541a543 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards cc4af48a9 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 7a00eeae1 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 7898c298b 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 96cf7a022 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards acc9733bc 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 25b03264c 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 780a07527 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 6b1ea273e 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 4fc03b420 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0d1c4d1f0 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards dbb729d91 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fcc5b23ee 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f3a3db98a 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c9a156a83 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c5e980722 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards a86002fdf 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 3589b9b4c 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 219af8f2f 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards f4f84e146 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards 8e95bf3d9 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 87898701b 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards b75429638 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards b4dc57ae4 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 1efeb7db3 force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ [...] new a457aeeb5 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new f957caf77 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new f283a694d 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new e20eee68d 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new da6b3e35d 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 8f33fa588 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 5e59f0c58 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 5ce1200e7 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 04d6f15ee 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2bee9be58 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d9548658a 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new afb58fb26 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f3c5da61c 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 34e1a3c41 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 23ce3ef45 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new b530f6e80 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 230300e43 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 8ff456321 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 8c182c261 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 2ff29c50f 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 5317bd2c0 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 15a2738dd 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new cd50a04b9 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new d9f9f003c 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new d3eaec144 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 17e5f2683 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new fb66b9375 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 200dc74bb 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new ee799aa2b 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 17347ea13 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new a48a31619 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 2ae565b51 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2f2d7784a 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 35f494552 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 73dd54b8e 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 0aaf9f5fa 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new c287a93af 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new f04efb6a6 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new d31861b50 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 2f7ebcaf9 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new afc54e236 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 3a34c4b31 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 20f96c233 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 6620fc778 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 88407d0b9 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 69e53ada7 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 06060dfdc 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new c53b7ea3d 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 8e6caffaf 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new e80323c68 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e7d949308 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 939001429 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new eccd53d69 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new b46c2b3a0 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new d0c1a91ef 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new ba85c485a 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 0b520f02d 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 6237f031a 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new d2e170a54 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 5274b47be 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 8da801632 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 2ca0888c8 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 6006b1128 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 0065cbf1c 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 4b91ec82d 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 0ce53ddb7 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new ff77ef612 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 834c1322c 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 274a754a4 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new e02a7b5fa 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1cde5bdfa 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 24194e7c3 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 57d8c676e 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5cad1a9c7 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c49d3a337 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 96f11b10a 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 03d9bece7 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new fe6d43346 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 276ccbb8b 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new de8e59af5 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 897de87a5 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2256e89a1 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new de61b6812 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 85062adab onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d9b010d59 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c18f9b29f onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 961628b0c onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4509fd303 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 45680f8bb onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 081d465c6 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ed4be9ec4 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 71b44dbac onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 1fa9c4c3b onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (00b3ae30f) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 94 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: