This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards ef4ede2709 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards b6cdf414f0 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 2086dae918 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1fe5154d3e 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 1f5081ef8b 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 293addb2d0 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards d118eca804 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 018557b84a 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 30230826ef 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards a79d67b19e 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 7d5d49bf85 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 9201769aac 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 251d6864ab 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c1cf0aa1a9 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5061430279 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 59d7a7ca07 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards cbf842aa30 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards ae6f41c9c4 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards ebdb3cb2fd 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards c1d3fe15b1 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 025d135db8 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 2ab3973f03 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 50d0ce594e 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards cb1374888c 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards b81a928821 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 184607e306 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e1d8b2ed1f 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 117e30d590 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 733104159f 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 0be29dcb25 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 07aa5e43ab 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards b507d8fd87 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards b82f939205 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards a3db906ed8 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 1de2ccf5d2 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0357947b6b 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 12e46312d1 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 6608c0b0b0 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 35ca15a22c 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards 4d0cf82aff 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards 24aa56dba4 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards eb94180479 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 63949bebb6 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards bf98f247d3 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 8142a988b1 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards a72e36db0b 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 6abc506de3 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards 9017fbd0dc 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards cfe806c9fc 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards f0c3c00975 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 9d2891f0e7 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 27c0894142 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards 32ba236c03 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards cd1d7c6323 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 08609de39c 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 5fc2bcb143 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards aac76b7d43 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 187c10f42f 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards a9e29791dd 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 4bd9ec2e88 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards efc7afc2e8 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards ea8e88cb18 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 289229a651 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 332772129d 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 4da1fe0018 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 000131fd76 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 0de1e62e54 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 87e7a55e26 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards f452e26804 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards 77b770d544 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 8e4d6e9d82 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 52013e0594 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards bb789446b8 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards 64c154371c 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 02757dfea2 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards c8f25bdc4e 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 95e1c09792 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8c00e637d1 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards a180fa1c26 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 8ff32069db 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards e32b6a4d06 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7032ab0dca 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards a1612d926e 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards d64e70e07c 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 53e96447b6 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] discards ee8404550f 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 0629549b06 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards aab4c8673d 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 2f1931c0b0 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards 1c4829bb73 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards fa0108031d 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards cad565a283 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards bbed82219c 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] discards a0d676f65f 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] discards dac76df411 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 3a15212f98 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 5b0a4a5dec 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8dc2c2c2f6 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1ea1af2ac9 5: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f29b3dc083 4: force: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 5da63ba81f 3: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 564 commits new a7d6619846 3: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 564 commits new e20566bb8d 4: force: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 0777b487b5 5: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a6d0415786 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e05de5c279 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ae3174f2ac 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 035c70e44e 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new c767acc122 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] new 7dd577fa6d 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] new 1538513028 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 1c5179b604 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new b5130a7b1d 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new 2abbffe560 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new ca80c87123 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 0d5d25082f 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 9ab326f7b1 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new c745489b21 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] new 6231e2b9e2 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new a94e28ca65 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 59e623293b 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new e279329c47 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 54dc5ecb10 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 1cd0201c49 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 8d655c7ffd 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 19e099e43e 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0d9670dd05 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new a4c09822ac 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 3fb9900a95 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new da2da11202 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new ba621e6b2f 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new ee31a729e3 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new ee8e910e2c 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 5830897f3a 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new df62d4f18f 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 7ca8015df7 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new efad94282a 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new af9313f64c 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 0365fdda49 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new eb212c7d4e 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 5516a547f8 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8e32baedab 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 9df2195377 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new eb8020a1f9 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new dd8d7fb631 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 6c05209191 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 1151bfa154 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new e864075d53 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new e83d8c76cb 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 01b2e73e95 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 000cdd8930 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new 4522901254 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 7f639318ab 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 8d47f708c9 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 1d855fd2b9 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new a89af94495 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new 1cdd6c1e09 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 9ce386bc35 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1c99879a49 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new c4af87984d 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new d24f57f032 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new d586793c9e 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new b07c1357e8 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new a1d60e8b80 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new e23f4a24e5 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 7df1710510 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 5c3e0b3e35 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new d692a42a40 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d0d747110f 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 6e8b4dbdcc 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new f4e0057cbe 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new 6595bc94da 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 8c29ba9473 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 7b1ea730f3 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new c615e9b21e 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new b039e3763b 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 88c4dab984 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a02e41238d 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 29431ab115 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new 5e26a8d3e3 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new cac76eabd7 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new 096af5117f 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 03ec26d963 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new a47cadd84c 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 681050ef3a 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new f50f22e1e4 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new a1e23eab03 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 4822a76726 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new a33921f923 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e361cba9d6 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9f314dd958 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new a06ab9e0af 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new cce551b60d 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 70e6bad45f 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 3f8fca38c2 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b5746bbca3 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 6d09e10cdf 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new 8dc504e6f7 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new 7e9eb8a9b9 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new 26df6bdd65 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 248c5170fc 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new a9740a314b 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 6ea7706793 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (ef4ede2709) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2080 -> 2056 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2504 -> 2504 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27516 -> 27568 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 89544 -> 89376 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8424 -> 8452 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233480 -> 233484 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 211072 -> 211768 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 166 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 164 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4280 -> 4340 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 169 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 16440 -> 16752 bytes .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 10 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 5 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 72 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/notify.sh | 2 +- manifest.sh | 19 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 236 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 28 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 28 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2800 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3399 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 55717 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 761698 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 24536 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 58 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 156 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3244 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 250 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 250 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3826 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 244 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 6 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3041 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3407 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 54106 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 703764 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 27888 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 72 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2800 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3399 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 55717 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 761698 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 24536 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 58 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 156 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3478 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3882 +- results_id | 2 +- 54 files changed, 1249881 insertions(+), 1255852 deletions(-)