This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards 1e5ae86be onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c41a5a229 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards d0d378a9c onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 8aaa899a3 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8da27ff90 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 76aebcf1b onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 48a71ced4 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d8932bc9d onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6e2479f91 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fa89e2126 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f62516ddd 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 6ceadb1a1 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ba4d19481 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 665366ba7 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 33f739202 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards e45815292 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards eb32bfbaf 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards eca105fef 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a60eb4fbb 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 9b68f3581 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a0d827a8f 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e97e60ca8 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3e8d978af 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 90a2ea3a0 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 71ceb1c54 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards d9fad5a06 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 587350491 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards d6fca4645 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 52c6ac99d 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 5f3637adf 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 92d6cce81 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards fdc2aa9e7 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards fbb303fe7 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards f57bcf03c 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 7fc5e52db 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards f5c4b783f 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards beaae36d8 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 69bf8a9ec 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 898b81033 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 2e3a53ff4 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 1f1c4ea9b 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 8188d52fd 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 243374a9f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3f17c49f3 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 17c6bfd87 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 8a351182c 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 23d13fd23 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 44677b9fc 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b8dbb110c 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 5ccdc98de 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 710abcf06 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards e9f420323 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 99733719c 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards d069a985d 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 4158b6018 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 2f254ab79 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 50a18074e 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 3d2d07dc6 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 31c67f03b 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards f350e90b8 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 31f8061b6 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 27dfc50dc 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 0ae646c5d 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 363a7b497 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards de56f489c 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 0a440cad9 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 2b112870b 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 14fd79eb7 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 1c0a7809d 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 872e73466 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards fe7f405d3 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 0eff9ca4a 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 53b5bc6c4 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 72505d4ca 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 7931fc7fa 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards aafa7701d 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards b1269d1c3 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 4957ca2d2 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 022f0e65c 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 987279f1a 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 577c7798d 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards c9313dfcb 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4c8a74f15 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0ab72b89a 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 89e97eaa5 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b360dc230 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 8bcea2fdd 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 8df69276b 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards e82acbb7f 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 0cdad0dd5 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards 7dca7015e 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 64cb8d534 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 5f9727041 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards c95978f7b 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 6bae1595d 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 731404a00 onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b4dc57ae4 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new b75429638 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 87898701b 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 8e95bf3d9 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new f4f84e146 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 219af8f2f 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 3589b9b4c 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new a86002fdf 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new c5e980722 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new c9a156a83 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f3a3db98a 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fcc5b23ee 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dbb729d91 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0d1c4d1f0 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 4fc03b420 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6b1ea273e 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 780a07527 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 25b03264c 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new acc9733bc 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 96cf7a022 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 7898c298b 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 7a00eeae1 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new cc4af48a9 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new f5541a543 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 3660d09e6 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new b00e30275 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new c89198256 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 1bb1b5f01 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 5e24ac836 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new d606445b6 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 9aeb9284f 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new cb581c9e3 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 2b06e12b0 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 6282889b0 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 68956d621 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new a148bd86f 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 26b543b5d 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new d3579f9fc 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new dbb09742a 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e21ddfb05 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new cefd29a77 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 8ebfcf8ea 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new ef24cf61e 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 3cf8bb475 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 43857e546 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new dfecf4401 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new b96d1caa9 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new beee0dae0 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 9909dd7fd 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 703ca61d5 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 7f6db0b73 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 388295a2c 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e1ef5ed96 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new ec82a7b79 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 3dcda3f7f 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 39643a5e6 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 0f14ef822 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 679615851 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 281cffd23 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new f3f8a4fd0 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new e534a98da 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new fcd415362 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 980b6ced6 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 58761967b 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 78a338f07 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new e35957d01 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new e3aad92e8 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new b3698a9d8 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new c952b14ba 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new c26f276c7 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 01e188313 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 12625cffd 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6fa15a477 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e3f5f67fa 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4fb617a0e 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f6d9d1564 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3018dd7f3 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a9e9b46fb 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 427ca872e 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1c928a59b 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 3fd606ecb 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new f9eb643a8 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 14e1f1cef 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 39fe8e5bc 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 60b2af038 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e00d7fb05 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 226ffef41 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a52444a51 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d5d25b028 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4f21215f9 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2008ac3b6 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a6e2bbf7a onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 4ca6f3367 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 00b3ae30f onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (1e5ae86be) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 95 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: