This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-Os_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 160e41d22a 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 0b9ad5d09d 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 7f0c6bef00 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards bf66076f44 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 1bf34c6021 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards dc6f2ff1a1 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 7f38bae9fb 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards cd36f7a01c 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 477f8b1530 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 71a8ec5125 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 4f77dcd44a 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits discards dc10712e65 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] discards 0cad12c4fa 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits discards bcea59a929 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] discards 0b7459c694 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards c8f4ef92c0 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] discards f374364466 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards fb11c2d550 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ba7f0a8da6 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits discards e0391aed56 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] discards d8e0fc875e 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits discards 646f27d61c 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards e97d9a5407 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 6e3929c46c 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5e3eedbb47 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards cade12e1b5 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0d1762127c 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 32abe47b26 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 031c808ebc 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 18cecf8618 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9e35c44ef4 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 60f862e4ff 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards af5d7fcad1 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9af5796be4 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 612001f38a 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards efbe7e72db 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a0a1b9048e 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 05a78e05f7 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0fad86ee91 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 93444a29e3 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5193467ba2 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e5179fb8c4 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 13345abf18 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] discards fa11d47559 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 91359111c9 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7abed696e5 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 756a4fe9f8 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards decd06303d 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f1bee8b006 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0b7610362c 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits discards fba9074f84 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] discards b6e964a3fb 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits discards df4f946bae 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] discards 3868160581 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits discards 864f9cda45 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 2ea8cea988 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits discards 2baf9b6e9b 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards c5d0a6689c 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards e46ec03cbb 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] discards 7f3d7ac03a 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 1433cb30eb 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0da645a5fc 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] discards 602bed3267 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards 469087c12c 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards 7c3b73c10e 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 28c2c2b94c 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards cf101be817 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 674388abb7 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9fedd8cc08 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 99ca54ad9b 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards fad95a4e9a 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 58a1b94b55 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 6d5115f571 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d4ac91881a 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 09d5aa43b5 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards 2c3c6b899f 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 478dd5a708 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits discards 343d940e82 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards 311e987f78 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits discards eac80d3ee8 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] discards aabcc7925e 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards fad15f8901 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards b333aa9940 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2a92185968 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits discards f6c9517feb 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] discards c503c590a8 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits discards be10c46869 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] discards 5713b86b0a 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits discards acc2b4580e 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 260d1b1e32 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-39 [...] discards 2193627990 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 commits discards 0c7112198c 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gli [...] discards c9fd37fb72 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards c1c6175469 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards afd9da3632 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/ [...] discards a8b2123d71 9: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] discards f4258e9849 8: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards ec2ae9ecb3 7: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards cbd45699a0 6: update: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards 28e4c72d71 5: reset: gcc-e5a9d60317852a7323e46109fa366e630b8b5bae: 1 discards 0f9f5823e1 4: update: binutils-linux-glibc: 1 new 61289b0223 4: update: binutils-linux-glibc: 1 new 45ad2af129 5: reset: gcc-e5a9d60317852a7323e46109fa366e630b8b5bae: 1 new 530d02097e 6: update: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 9c83929f92 7: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 3f575e60f8 8: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new ce6e182f6d 9: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] new 81bd06bc55 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/ [...] new 416f879da7 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new 186ad601cf 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new d5b0e28a1c 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gli [...] new 37bbb69f50 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 commits new 73ef5b5060 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-39 [...] new 340df63af4 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new a5cb0ad62c 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits new 3109f0eb74 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] new 7a11404392 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits new ec21ebf504 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] new d23002008d 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits new d3164018c0 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d91a3d8618 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new bfc8f27161 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 4e37ef7841 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] new 3fc4e90f22 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits new 5d5b9e1eb5 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new 558d3369f2 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits new 54b26f25be 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 71a4daeac4 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new 3db084252c 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 65d3120ea3 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 73dd02f003 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new bd5a08c7fa 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ef7f587336 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3130cb12d3 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 249856f762 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2f4b17e753 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6e59b817fc 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f813477d95 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new a9cf6ce1d2 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new 3c0f8b6d76 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new dbcff3c49b 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] new 872f25f2f1 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c2a4ae8d5d 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 9e04057971 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] new d517db6edb 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 97831bc180 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 71066e868d 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits new 4ee79df160 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 76f56d0f45 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits new c40fc133ed 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] new 9f00a0cc5b 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits new b693779369 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] new 0c141de6ea 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits new 43b9a2e336 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c70b40c7de 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 9efc0c56a0 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new cf98643372 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ff503f2b00 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6dc3128cb8 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e3d8aee250 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] new 93953a8872 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 558eb17cbf 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 299affcdf9 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5a0644b8a8 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new fe6a8985c8 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8fa80f5985 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 352eb5fceb 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a0140b57d3 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8137bd24af 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 86302f2c70 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 39a266dc70 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ab04553237 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 20a49c108a 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c6ca6d0936 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f104c2f07c 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7100e38441 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ca9b0cfeb8 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 294e3f316b 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c2f2b38f32 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 70dc75ab1c 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1a2bf0ffca 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 22efa52229 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits new 8596c87550 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] new 648ab0abbe 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits new 691950d4bc 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 92ff739044 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 80f02c8cf2 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] new ca36ead6d9 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new fd28b84613 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] new b90b0c6cec 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits new 2d943d5804 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] new 6c17f233ba 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits new e97cef6c38 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 72034b02d0 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 3e946acafe 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a5cbbabfd8 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 208360374d 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 372d48ecd1 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 7556987fed 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 9078e74f50 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 1c14e5ac1a 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 69f12121d8 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 9b837f78d5 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (160e41d22a) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gn [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2044 -> 2100 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2464 -> 2460 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28024 -> 27900 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 72372 -> 71348 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 332 -> 332 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7552 -> 8364 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 242988 -> 241800 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 176688 -> 177096 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 101 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 99 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4048 -> 4004 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 46 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 7368 -> 9392 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.improvement | 1 + 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/error_code-1 | 0 .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 4 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/extra-bisect-params | 1 - 11-update_baseline/console.log | 70 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/notify.sh | 2 +- mail/exe.improvement | 1 + manifest.sh | 32 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 55 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 16 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 384454 +++---- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 456634 ++++----- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 16 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 16 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 38 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 142 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 929787 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 932699 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 38 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 40 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 4 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 63 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 164 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 2600 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 77 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 4 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 137 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 946795 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 932586 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 36 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 38 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 142 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 929787 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 932699 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 38 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 40 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 4 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 71 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 172 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 76 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 76 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3424 +- results_id | 2 +- 68 files changed, 3227020 insertions(+), 3226540 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/error_code-1 create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/extra-bisect-params create mode 100644 mail/exe.improvement