This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.

discards 12496817 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 94012608 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a8a74775 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ce3d8002 onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f338e0bc onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 45b01a31 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f56a36f5 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 996f6b66 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 55b29e6f 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e7dc3514 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 102f2a90 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 27338b51 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a0641930 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] discards f9b08f92 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] discards 924af8b1 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8b10d200 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards ff266644 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e3182100 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards fc9d8aad 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5a413d1b 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 71b93154 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 907ec5f2 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4af1b153 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits discards 527a6d7b 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] discards f0896100 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits discards 4cbe7275 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards e2c3733d 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 9a74a681 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 2ea42de3 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 52358138 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 5fc10eff 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits discards 27b519a1 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 0558c8af 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 03bc66ec 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards f962c88f 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4a2bdf6d 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] discards 1edbfecd 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8876181c 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0a8d3852 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 19994dbe 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1a0a3f44 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2a33ed8a 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] discards 12cb9b01 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards 2e58ccc5 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits discards 969f5807 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] discards 20b88f58 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits discards 7693f57d 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ce6695ee 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 82196cfa 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards f9fd6f1c 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits discards de6870c5 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] discards f1b47d5f 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits discards 9c931f21 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9799c96e 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 6487effc 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5d1fcfab 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 52d08fb0 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9d38331d 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 45990ac9 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] discards 2c8deb29 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits discards f43c8000 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards eb51605a 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 98681163 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits discards c58d74cf 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards caf7841d 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c6466a96 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] discards 550773b1 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits discards 84f54919 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...] discards d0a63b55 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits discards 1d464742 5: onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK a [...] discards 47f6bc72 4: onsuccess: #349: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 1565 commits discards 022f33d5 3: force: #348: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build after [...] discards 92b03764 2: force: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng:[.] std_eval slowed do [...] new 1fecfd89 force: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ [...] new 6dbb842a 3: force: #348: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build after [...] new 868dd11a 4: onsuccess: #349: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 1565 commits new d3729fd9 5: onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK a [...] new e4b78384 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits new be5bd5ed 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...] new dadd4bf6 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits new 1f721be3 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] new 24a2e956 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1f57d302 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6bb75bac 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits new 8133a95a 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 219713b4 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 0c29d51c 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits new e678d793 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] new 035734ed 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new be8677d3 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b39a09c6 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 0d7a8994 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c0809bf2 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 5bc1b54d 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a3010320 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits new 97b3c239 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] new d3a9462a 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits new 45fd0efe 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 79d6c08d 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new b56891ca 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e1055fdf 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits new 3c4592fb 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] new 4de20edc 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits new 4336c961 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new 663a144c 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] new 13fd5d1f 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0498bb75 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 37db471d 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new eb3fd273 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 45c41f15 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new daf27939 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] new 2173d497 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c852be7a 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 356b1db9 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 1de8f251 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 0451b06e 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits new 6cd55b16 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 12cfe9da 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 476cdbf9 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new e08d9d64 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 6eace83f 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 8ac22c30 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits new 4c594308 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] new aaeec24c 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits new 5a915d2c 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f1d74b5e 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7ff4e8f2 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 19db2b63 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a8b1b4ae 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 189b7af9 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 2cd0a8dd 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new bea9d54f 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new dea9cfd5 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] new f5421dca 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] new 2e0b5ee4 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8f98f599 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3d5700e5 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d5f93517 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new caa479f2 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 440c456b 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 99b6fef7 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a63b1807 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1445c72c onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1acf8d62 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d5d1763f onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 26c21ee7 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (12496817) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 73 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: