This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-Os_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 54acb23a5f 107: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 525c15c05f 106: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 77bad4727d 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 23c77d82b4 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 96bd7340d5 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 2bf500ec2e 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 9abaa92cea 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 0fe2936a8c 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 3d9a265f19 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a4a61f3424 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 8e177207c1 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f74eec2033 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 283b982441 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 6a0aa6318d 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits discards 212a2e787c 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] discards 32d8353777 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits discards 5a4004975d 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] discards 52c304524e 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 963aefebfe 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] discards 51c3d2aadd 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards f0cff37a1f 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a339ea71d0 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits discards 3a60feb35d 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] discards 268ded3653 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits discards 6b1ded50cc 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards fa7a84d232 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1480b0c3ab 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c850a30566 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 8c3090a8e8 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d88b082939 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e6e022c5d8 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards cea2296f64 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 6f3332bd4c 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards bdfc90718b 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 55e405db29 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0582907c73 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1bbaba69d0 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9a32b03d13 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7e10faf408 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a2ddadbad3 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3932d2d4a3 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2cbf1f26cd 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f6f0bf06fc 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 26d00639a8 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c386aa9e96 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards cade0854bc 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] discards 95d01ff818 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 067354b785 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 94a292095b 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2b67df68b3 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 059d8a8011 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 5f1e0e8cdc 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 56310a345e 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits discards 064354db6e 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] discards 5b7ed9ea4a 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits discards f86ab573d8 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] discards f97b3a8f08 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits discards 9194684bf9 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 85e9fc7887 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits discards 441522ff80 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards f2e6875825 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards f958030142 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] discards dabc93ea21 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards a19b3dd8af 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards acad4922e2 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] discards 8935b6154e 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards 6cb141540d 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards 54208f7200 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b5dbf11f34 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d8216705dc 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 4b89163bcb 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 5e20e27bd7 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 6fb94b6197 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards fbdd686a1d 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1148b098bb 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards c7e1610edf 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards cdf60e98c2 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 824c30cabd 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards 97cd68d651 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 126c0b11f7 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits discards 7c9dc90c17 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards 7bc95fb1e2 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits discards 9ca798e45d 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] discards 546700be52 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 05b0596445 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards dc90c4b594 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 61be92e5b1 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits discards fd1a73c073 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] discards 03232fa79d 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits discards 436db55431 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] discards 80e34032c1 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits discards 9a920ed44d 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards dcefe7ee69 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-39 [...] discards 9102fe4e59 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 commits discards e9d30242f9 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gli [...] discards 4b9c8041e7 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards c0015205ab 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards f745c305fa 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/ [...] discards a1281c6f2a 9: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] discards 6802d48ba9 8: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards aa20ee6abe 7: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new e8f169a0bf 7: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new cdf70085c0 8: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 1191415dc0 9: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] new cf19b1bac4 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/ [...] new a9ae119c66 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new a817a71562 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new 6fa368755f 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gli [...] new 790a4ca647 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 commits new 4b18c92124 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-39 [...] new 291a903dbd 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new da734b9a2d 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits new f793450191 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] new 58e9edcca2 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits new d6215483e5 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] new 7726823ddb 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits new 9fd400471a 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 37e2273372 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new a59d51d24a 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new ac27273be9 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] new 5b17dff643 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits new fcbac4c9eb 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new 543117b8f3 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits new c5782c290a 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 8e05f705ec 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new e8bf6ed2a1 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 9223acc4c2 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ceef93da54 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 775e422e6a 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 852ae21e43 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 42d0f70f07 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0927272711 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new de6cf8da14 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 28eaf93ce4 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 71245fd080 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 73d0319aca 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new 0a73dfce23 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new 4353cec905 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] new 43c3bb8200 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 08b2d14d63 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 2184db64f4 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] new 2094387b4e 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 22b806ca3c 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 77f49a1d9d 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits new c1b399e8d9 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 36143c889f 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits new ead980e3d3 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] new 8465348556 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits new f63f422a5a 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] new 68f6b6e535 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits new c02092a451 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 583e2c465c 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0498b28637 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4c62c8e7a2 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a01db80940 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new edf0220ec0 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a4e4ff54a1 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] new 88dbdc95cf 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 28316f449c 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new efcab7f887 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ec00b6b5a4 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9c3a138495 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 43b0d2ed54 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 257b65c13d 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 3fdca266ed 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new baa1ec0d97 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 053cce968a 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c16bec5875 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 93b6d6c508 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7e9ff89399 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new dfb43ae442 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c2cd9d5556 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 61a020b905 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 41f62dc043 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new bc422ada0f 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4a812b6484 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 417933a77e 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0e1d70bf24 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 78d963428d 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits new d3332a54cb 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] new 12c00997e2 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits new f20fd726aa 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6189ddad73 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 0f765c959c 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] new afdc275504 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 21def46d34 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] new 0c0fce6b63 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits new 82ccaddf23 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] new bfb44fa717 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits new fa8b934fac 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 30f079fd0d 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new fd79b11764 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 163d81ab1a 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3967977675 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6f157165c9 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 89c0cf119f 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 292f9d334b 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 73fd1a42f4 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new d0650c8e8b 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 1e524edcec 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 693df7f55f 106: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 7cafbcdd73 107: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 0b66e5bd13 108: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (54acb23a5f) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gn [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2220 -> 2208 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2492 -> 2460 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28088 -> 27300 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 72648 -> 72204 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 332 -> 332 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7628 -> 8356 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 243484 -> 242528 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 178508 -> 176964 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 99 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 97 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4012 -> 3988 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 44 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 8984 -> 8284 bytes .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 70 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 32 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 63 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 16 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 384454 ++++---- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 456634 ++++----- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 16 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 16 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 42 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 147 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 929934 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 932858 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 42 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 36 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 1 - results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 71 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 161 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 79 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 79 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 2502 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 77 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 3 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 138 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 929886 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 932806 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 36 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 147 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 929934 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 932858 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 36 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 1 - results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 71 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 163 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 79 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 79 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3372 +- results_id | 2 +- 62 files changed, 3218732 insertions(+), 3218631 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff