This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards c35b20cd5f 116: force: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards b09be2baa2 115: onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 5cbdb160a4 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 4568ec2b68 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 0df57a0fbc 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 016d39804a 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 5e640d5652 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards da51e4f69c 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 5cd6084f42 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 5cad5cc9f6 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards e5a38136fe 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 42c5ffafbb 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 66cebf4258 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 8b57e9aab4 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 2b38e7718e 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 68850630c2 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards b68804ab13 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards c505d1d08c 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards cbd71ef61c 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 1a13b4e547 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 75654f8f9f 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 266c8832ef 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards d48a31c442 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards a2a1bbb7ad 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 6a8ac09790 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 29514cd699 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards e38fac9939 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 9d74bd8bd9 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0f85887ebf 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards cb362215b1 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards aa43b4b69f 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards 456b7ca18b 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards 6d6dcfae36 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards bf0682b0b4 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 5726353d7a 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards da17615161 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] discards 4a4e4c745b 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 1e61b9445f 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] discards 9075332cac 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards 1cea5b9e7a 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards f46460031f 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards 2597110ec6 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 9e41e5f93e 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 7d39ce0b59 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards cb0e92c42c 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards 8e6823cda8 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 4dadb99438 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards cb0024369b 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d0a6fda19b 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards f770f1f9fd 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 2dbc6f58cd 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards bc3b8691e5 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7e8db775a9 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6b6efef69c 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 93cfbe2925 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards a01d63454f 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 41f9927451 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards fc9796c7ea 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards e985f68083 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 5966e7fd81 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 375190a3b7 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 69bbf73663 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] discards 826ba0f899 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 19f6fa9893 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards c86d8f927e 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 4e5792959a 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards d1911261c8 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards ed99c0c171 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards db88c5e601 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards cd20221b96 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards b46ff878a7 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 86bf9038aa 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards fd20f8f76a 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards c0c85eee11 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] discards 5e63e62284 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] discards 44b38a6f14 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] discards 55b93704c5 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards d3e6896b8e 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 060f306591 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards d6aad7354d 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] discards eac690a64d 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 3e5d30d1f0 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 3d3c2975b6 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9e1017a01c 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0a81a88ad6 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 468bd4f0d3 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 39a99192af 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 64a2a26fb6 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 5b61b074ce 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 6445c73b21 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 64d65df41b 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 6124be41e1 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 20ef0682b0 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards 30858c8138 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 817bc15550 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards 5100905d08 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 249b6370ec 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards dfb944909e 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards 526c3b0948 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards 5328234c92 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards a7ae2bff56 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 23ecb158dc 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new d7624fe79c 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5fb627c472 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new 1d280e0c49 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new f87c021790 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new 112424e6fa 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 177f48a7c7 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new 80e635160f 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 6b3e5256dd 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new ae358f24d9 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 0ace832f6b 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new e39d9c1c8d 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new faa5d58e95 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1a0354bf15 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4ac9b458e6 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new 769c44d7d2 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 58e46d998f 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 13f9dabec5 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d4825a5f2b 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3b311f8a21 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 6fa0d055b2 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 878ac0eb56 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] new 78c37d11b0 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new f810adac33 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new e52f324cdf 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new bfd19a283c 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] new 67947bd043 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] new b96bfffcc4 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] new ce6f3d85f0 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new f4db42efa4 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 444e4c3b80 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 4471bfa492 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 705a435001 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 93a5408b47 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new f02ca9b6a2 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 3dad010343 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 21a6835d94 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e27c237c0a 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 6d4e8f1a3d 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 19b7c2193a 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] new 67f14749df 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 4b532833ca 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new c90863914e 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new f0341918d4 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new eae4d10e2e 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new 7c70c83084 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 555f676979 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 7ef5165542 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 7e8c24a099 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bf015aa7e2 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4ac5ddbde8 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b892633d39 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 7b7a4de52d 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 8c874bad71 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9b07b5cc8b 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 628e6ea8e4 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new e65eee2171 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new cd9f57e4c1 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new c8fbed1067 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new c06e2a5d37 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new cbd84cc231 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new bb350d49e8 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 976dd5b5dd 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new 2507070d87 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] new dbc0b56c5f 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new d72630cb66 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] new 99db30d495 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new a0bc4ffae2 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new e95c8c3813 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new fce27ecdf6 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new efcbfed3e8 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new 6c822d35b4 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f650b9ec17 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a9e325f17f 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 229ef18668 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new abe6555d47 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new b77658059d 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 55ae58d015 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 2bac1c4ef3 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new bcb2048433 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new ef41a81e2f 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 7d467b729e 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new bd0a51736a 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 080fd7d62c 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 152e88ba6a 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 6fcc13357f 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c12657567f 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ca724f7947 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 08cda69ebb 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new b7b14bfc2f 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 543c083b68 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 32271bc231 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 50d4b3deb1 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new d7f41d5250 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 83b0f19313 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8ec20c8818 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 693c9ad4e2 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 0eebbb3608 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c298ea4b55 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f64da8ae25 115: onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c1a10bab8c 116: force: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 4cd7e4b73d 117: onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (c35b20cd5f) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2192 -> 2352 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2436 -> 2632 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27468 -> 27556 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17688 -> 17740 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90476 -> 91396 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 69964 -> 70260 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8544 -> 7772 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233676 -> 235180 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185576 -> 185860 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 212008 -> 212204 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 179704 -> 178764 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 190 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 188 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4180 -> 4160 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 200 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 18548 -> 17916 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.regression | 1 - 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- ...ymbol.improvement.diff => diff-bmk-results.out} | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 7 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 11 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 1 - 10-check_regression/results.regressions | 1 - 11-update_baseline/console.log | 74 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 29 +- notify/check-regression-status.txt | 2 +- notify/exe.regression | 1 - results | 1 - results-vs-first/cmp-results.diff | 1 + results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 246 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2762 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 770652 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 760870 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30358 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 936 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3099 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3324 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 758038 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 761004 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30536 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1144 +- ...ults-brief.csv => csvs2table-results-brief.csv} | 68 +- results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 1752 + results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 128 + .../csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff | 0 results-vs-first/csvs2table-results.csv | 128 + results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 150 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 1748 - results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 250 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 128 - results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3868 +- results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff | 1 + results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 8 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2685 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3395 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 755818 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 761363 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30642 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 1110 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3099 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3324 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 758038 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 761004 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30536 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1144 +- ...ults-brief.csv => csvs2table-results-brief.csv} | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 1752 + results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 128 + .../csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff | 0 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 128 + results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 150 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 1748 - results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 128 - results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4312 +- results_id | 2 +- 82 files changed, 3116072 insertions(+), 3136926 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.regression copy 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/{symbol.improvement.diff => diff-bmk-r [...] delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/results.regressions delete mode 100644 notify/exe.regression create mode 100644 results-vs-first/cmp-results.diff rename results-vs-first/{results-brief.csv => csvs2table-results-brief.csv} (58%) create mode 100644 results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-full.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-internal.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff create mode 100644 results-vs-first/csvs2table-results.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-first/results-full.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-first/results.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff rename results-vs-prev/{results-brief.csv => csvs2table-results-brief.csv} (52%) create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/results-full.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/results.csv