This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards 2ccb1fd50 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 4da66fea4 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards cfefe7212 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 2fe99eafc onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 863037094 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c33354834 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5382fd1a5 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5d15448d7 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 4f6885cf6 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ac6ca1795 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 4cf6d5869 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards feac54ad5 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 731c7cbe7 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 6cae84de1 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 2cbff6f6c 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards ddde7e553 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 81d3744ad 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a7590f63f 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a3bcb366e 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b4e80dcf2 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 979993a32 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards dcf3ac4f1 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 66b3f5dbf 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7f589ee5e 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 03831623b 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 22e48decf 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 1434f9557 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 2417d5ba7 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 4539238f7 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards a5e67c461 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards f593a5416 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards e6cbbf2d3 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards b11232b7c 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards f30608031 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 311361265 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 49dc4a4f1 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 359e33ee1 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards b88123af6 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 723563c2d 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 674f8d366 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 79936a9bb 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 537315a6b 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 9586535fd 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 53b8e238a 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 43bbb7696 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 693eb3359 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 42cacefbb 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 6385ec5ce 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 82c837243 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 59e31bb29 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 50a6eb0bf 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards f0c3aa276 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 8ddcc13be 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards ffd315d19 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 577be58e4 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 721a8dbe4 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards eb1be0307 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 3115dd248 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards a88729c01 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards af544308b 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 5e356ce8f 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 1b840a260 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 7a0e9585a 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 7a54aa964 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 54b1207df 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 8fc38adc3 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 82a80c8b8 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 82dc78edd 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 406e80060 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards b1d0243ad 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 587894f93 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 21e83838a 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 14d6bcfb0 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 085087f35 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards fe6f15c69 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 66fed5f77 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards cb97db63f 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 568e3bc33 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 3fada389a 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards e3f78d543 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 94411690d 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 2d7eac831 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 985c8e8f1 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4ba81c77d 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 44978f402 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d438cbf77 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 5750bef3b 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 648ac364d 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards e145f0152 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 5147a0bfc onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c06203651 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new f7eb3adef 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 349869495 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new d842c6445 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 265ca1f6d 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 81383fe73 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 62de22e74 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 92eea3bd3 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new d4c1d68c6 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3e0b377be 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 8ee26a89c 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new a59cc86ca 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new a5c407b06 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new a921e091b 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new f634562de 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new cf9c477cf 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 992fe9052 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 6ca4072d4 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 322f4cae5 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new a61e2226d 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 0bcfef0c0 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 742c0c78b 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 3275ad536 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new b42881fc2 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 87b9ed365 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 16beaf4e2 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 6fb76f0b5 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new aeff9700c 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 42a350e03 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 02a719b36 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 6e928626c 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new e569a0ad1 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new b4f30bd2c 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 42de1fe62 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 4790231b3 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1e0c01c69 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 631a4d47c 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 9f86b462e 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new a59c9dad3 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new df04767fd 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 90bf98ead 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e71c9ade8 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new b653ffcc5 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 12e2b934c 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 54ec29e7f 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 2f80e4999 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c42a2e001 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 8d5abc3e5 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 902f6a777 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 9417024e6 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new b22db4569 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new d2c47fa06 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 76ed93eab 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new b0b1512b2 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 279bf37cc 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new b664197ef 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 57e4e4d13 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new bd850687e 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 1417af232 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 4a737f56e 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 757fbbaff 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 6bde949d7 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 04430b3af 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 3057b77d0 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new b6e6e5f00 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f446e483b 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 55be1f842 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 954088ff4 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1f129029d 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8834d0147 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new fa9b3343e 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ff5425ed7 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new eb48e3443 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new cec7f0343 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 89dda5aea 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 52c7b9713 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new dd37900ae 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 0ca5b544b 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 9a159389e onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5058ee468 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2af8c529e onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 88114e9f1 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 06825cca9 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c919024f8 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1268e4e15 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new bf0ee1298 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 9cced7b8a onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 43591c720 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (2ccb1fd50) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 89 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: