This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.

discards 8977f096 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3e04e87b onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6f811b3e onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 714aea8b onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 71e19793 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2a3f50e1 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 19d5f836 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 24906b6e 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 098f21d6 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e4d1a71d 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 63f23f35 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards eb721984 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 695063bd 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] discards 6c4de349 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] discards 8ecd2a73 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 70c20b1a 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 00b68224 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1c7bf7f6 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4e516650 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 79b9de3f 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0396cc00 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4a1adf1e 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a84fe72f 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits discards 84e70650 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] discards c48ff9ab 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits discards 52f14027 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 4dae1170 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards fec31f70 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards d6a1370f 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 7cdd87f5 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 8b29f6c7 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits discards af201f48 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 718d6dfc 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards dbb52250 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 0cc63be7 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a3a40572 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] discards 33d17ba9 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f0c08da1 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f8c5a37a 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 385573dd 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 43ec5a54 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9c072474 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] discards b026cce8 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards 48f818c7 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits discards d93cfa29 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] discards 85da614a 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits discards 393dc007 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b0748f1d 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 6ff7fa5e 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards aefb67c4 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits discards 8367f10c 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 0793dada 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits discards 62640361 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 76bb41c7 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 91a175f5 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8f6e9a7d 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards b8b8aa1e 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 04ea231f 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d0bf2e9a 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] discards 7edc88a8 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits discards 9050e281 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards 251bbb96 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8e04b417 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits discards 749d4d6d 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 59fe387e 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5c7965aa 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] discards 8d36d1d8 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits discards 1ebdf501 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...] discards 1517314f 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits new eacbe55c force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ [...] new 7a1c794b 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...] new 9913d738 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits new 0fc6110d 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] new 13cd06ba 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a8f03006 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 76227ba0 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits new b1b9c318 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6c6c60f3 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new c407d5c0 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits new 5d602962 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] new 873be153 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ab2e2c96 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1d935ff1 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 47a5f1c2 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e23f3e85 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 98c17fa8 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7424f6e2 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits new db3d5eab 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] new 346b1190 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits new f05092a0 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 58e886cc 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 51f612e5 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 96469fa0 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits new eab6868e 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] new 9e4b74b9 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits new 36dd4bae 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new 915ca6d0 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] new 043aaa46 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7c8ae4c6 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4a21dee4 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a72fdf94 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b4c93330 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5af8dd8e 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] new 993d19e2 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 93aeb41a 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 5b39de93 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 60b61c49 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 80b4eb1c 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits new 6c400318 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 81f18003 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 7b59ca84 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new ae80633d 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new e28db607 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new de053262 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits new ff6a0ab7 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] new 05ab167e 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits new 631b6c57 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d9dc91fe 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7b4e442a 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b7ef7f81 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b0162c58 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 69dc4d6e 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4a071154 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new fa19fece 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new bb9e6980 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] new 9ddf4f18 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] new 46a3dbdb 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f7ded92a 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9f4aea67 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 421678c0 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d834d439 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e84ac6e9 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e8e8fd71 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 04dc7df9 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c1c5d42e onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9d52618b onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 43355f23 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b294e594 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (8977f096) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 69 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: