This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards bf65337b8b5 104: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards ed7ec3ba916 103: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards a5de4deab0c 102: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 06ef9d7c8c6 101: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 0b01303d8e4 100: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 6fbff94c184 99: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards e39fbc204ea 98: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards af260f72f8e 97: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 2e8d4200c09 96: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards b6281fca9c8 95: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards b48b1e089da 94: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 5f64b2a0e38 93: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards a5fc34902cd 92: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4a237d8e2ee 91: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5a9a3309984 90: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e57ce14baec 89: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3a7454ab4a7 88: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1344831ae96 87: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by - [...] discards 02ca4f565c9 86: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7b6aa268e19 85: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0afe5c52f01 84: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6160b13db33 83: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards dd34ed24ea2 82: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 443ded97cf9 81: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 133 commits discards 2c9772a7205 80: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 04d8d8c70c1 79: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d7e0ecea44b 78: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 99c034305ce 77: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 43772e6f24e 76: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d59f55bea66 75: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 421a8f849a5 74: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 676 [...] discards 71d67866602 73: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards e63c7581397 72: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 517 commits discards 23df30b5a78 71: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 658beb31ca1 70: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 1cce2183823 69: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 24dce56658c 68: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 975cdd39b42 67: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 170 [...] discards e53397a508f 66: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run OK [...] discards b4a43e82de8 65: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards d08321b63cc 64: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 266ffa0d573 63: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 75958bac756 62: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards 60d3b8c928d 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 206e79d7cc5 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3048519f07d 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d55cb984c3a 58: onsuccess: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards f9b7f3e4463 57: onsuccess: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 198 commits discards 4274bef5e92 56: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray slowed down by 5% [...] discards fcf7e8be39c 55: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 247ace7001b 54: force: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 141 commits discards 08158f66094 53: onsuccess: #454: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 61 [...] discards 8dfa28ca449 52: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 4524aed60de 51: onsuccess: #443: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards b18ddd16302 50: onsuccess: #441: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards e745be970a8 49: onsuccess: #440: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 8a9a5d17755 48: onsuccess: #439: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards b0dc74183d9 47: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 06d5dd4ee6b 46: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 4403bbf3bb5 45: onsuccess: #436: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 231 commits discards 97a1d0cdd3c 44: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards c0c8914993c 43: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 41 [...] discards 88f4183ead4 42: force: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.7-149-ga [...] discards 89cb592cd76 41: force: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 6 [...] discards b2d40c84907 40: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 4 commits discards 5901d35b382 39: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 552aa75d1ea 38: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 225b1eb3118 37: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] discards 34dab2554bd 36: force: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] 454.calculix slowed down by 1 [...] discards bc2b11b1841 35: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 24 commits discards 5b16f46f67c 34: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 12 [...] discards 9ffb3e17475 33: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] discards 710805bb752 32: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 1986f706974 31: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 0495d5efa59 30: onsuccess: #409: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4 [...] discards b388d736aa3 29: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 84 [...] discards 4b28250e659 28: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] discards 0c56efced58 27: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 184 commits discards 570e19ce9a1 26: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 8ae689e9566 25: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp speeds up by [...] discards c256c5778f8 24: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 5 [...] discards 7ef2ef1a271 23: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 216 commits discards 22be2cd9db0 22: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards b13f7b92155 21: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 8bb84f877f6 20: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.11- [...] discards b90d21fc85a 19: onsuccess: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 17 [...] discards cb756b181cd 18: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits discards db5affdb3d5 17: onsuccess: #384: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 031e8ff05ff 16: onsuccess: #382: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc built and run OK [...] discards fe52f18af33 15: onsuccess: #380: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 32454b6aac2 14: onsuccess: #378: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 20 commits discards 334d3e892cd 13: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to build after [...] discards e3f2306df7a 12: force: #376: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] discards a74d6938cc9 11: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4 [...] discards aa359a412f6 10: onsuccess: #374: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 118bf93a694 9: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b88bc87d548 8: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1a3be0ce91a 7: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] discards cf877d1e5ea 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards a640a4e4112 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards 7b0a218cad9 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new 3da09b7cc45 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new d35b96eff88 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new 373001fdb0c 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new 71bcbb92832 7: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] new f9f3aed9669 8: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 968a313ea19 9: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5a50388e982 10: onsuccess: #374: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 664b3322811 11: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4 [...] new b608626e1b7 12: force: #376: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] new 2807af9cbe7 13: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to build after [...] new ffa2622404d 14: onsuccess: #378: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 20 commits new bc44ff6ffff 15: onsuccess: #380: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 786009ae285 16: onsuccess: #382: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc built and run OK [...] new 31efec6cde5 17: onsuccess: #384: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new a776111fb85 18: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits new 01f8a7ded31 19: onsuccess: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 17 [...] new 9b83ec45fda 20: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.11- [...] new c0943e34c61 21: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 14b662e974d 22: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new d1a7dbc98c2 23: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 216 commits new 40688fcbd4e 24: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 5 [...] new ad91f018040 25: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp speeds up by [...] new 9bd961dba6f 26: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 0432ac984cc 27: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 184 commits new d4e45be7a23 28: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] new 936de734a3a 29: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 84 [...] new 18195a65984 30: onsuccess: #409: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4 [...] new 6cc5051a62f 31: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 4c0c719f733 32: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 94031044851 33: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] new 3a95fa56e9f 34: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 12 [...] new 87038dcff93 35: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 24 commits new df2e155bb73 36: force: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] 454.calculix slowed down by 1 [...] new 69e12f2181b 37: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] new cb16476fc7b 38: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new e79fc1ffa67 39: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new b12b84365ae 40: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 4 commits new 0a4feb32ef5 41: force: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 6 [...] new 390bc4e77c6 42: force: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.7-149-ga [...] new d1ebbd4ab70 43: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 41 [...] new 8a9c1ef7696 44: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 405b016bfe0 45: onsuccess: #436: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 231 commits new 5cee0f11b56 46: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 6d45abbd309 47: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 36a6a95a892 48: onsuccess: #439: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new a7b55b3e086 49: onsuccess: #440: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new c36cf995dd4 50: onsuccess: #441: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 716f9a46f45 51: onsuccess: #443: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 2e1e8c41dd1 52: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 9bee7a607de 53: onsuccess: #454: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 61 [...] new 4e97f5d4f99 54: force: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 141 commits new aced22386ec 55: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 548737a4556 56: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray slowed down by 5% [...] new ae59a5322a8 57: onsuccess: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 198 commits new 6bf495b31bd 58: onsuccess: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 34bb790c58f 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 96cb1363c30 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9d74139f7b0 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 768cc64cef9 62: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 01559972bb8 63: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new ffb383e333f 64: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 421242cf429 65: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new 7990b29b3c1 66: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run OK [...] new a11127da00e 67: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 170 [...] new fe59cc41bcc 68: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new d63ba82b6ad 69: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 1d713988562 70: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 51ed08c34da 71: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new fafb42e057b 72: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 517 commits new 9546b1c9f74 73: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new 629507480bc 74: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 676 [...] new 7baf7b4a097 75: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3f811bcdec4 76: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 367338c54a2 77: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new e954909935d 78: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5e15b552994 79: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d557e0d409d 80: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 9e4b4b19f78 81: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 133 commits new 2b180ca3858 82: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1fcae9c9e59 83: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 40cbf5c7c2e 84: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bf430c3591f 85: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 35947d2ce57 86: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6d94eba162d 87: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by - [...] new d59bfc64d25 88: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new abe9849f015 89: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3d386e5c5a5 90: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ae44e2f1570 91: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 8aae23198a7 92: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 0fde4b459ca 93: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 2c357fc30de 94: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 073318b0cd9 95: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 4ac92312aa3 96: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c84838215b5 97: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ceeab8275cc 98: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new a3bb78e878a 99: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 0da5056b8f5 100: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 98fbbb45f7f 101: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 807f433e716 102: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 766763aab80 103: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new de59aa2483c 104: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 5728890e041 105: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (bf65337b8b5) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2168 -> 2232 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2432 -> 2576 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27620 -> 28176 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17932 -> 18072 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 72404 -> 73952 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 52900 -> 52728 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 364 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8540 -> 8580 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 242760 -> 244936 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 194444 -> 194400 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 177184 -> 178620 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 146412 -> 146164 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 168 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 166 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4144 -> 4112 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 6944 -> 7380 bytes .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 2 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 1 + 11-update_baseline/console.log | 56 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 32 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 81 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 44 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 168 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 74520 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 605608 +++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 14456 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 2784 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 36 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 184 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 82 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 82 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3210 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 83 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 38 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 163 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 41116 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 690550 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 16536 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 3102 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 168 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 74520 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 605608 +++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 14456 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 2784 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 36 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 186 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 82 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 82 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3882 +- results_id | 2 +- 57 files changed, 1084348 insertions(+), 1070914 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff