This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 6ccf5dfad4 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards c4aacf3502 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards daec3c6f34 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 4ca2d52d78 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 8b85fcbb54 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards feca91ccf5 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards f84c113a5a 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a6a9c0c0ec 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a30bff90c8 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 99c42683d1 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 728cc78a64 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards ec493c1114 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 3c1e074a2d 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a561470822 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 15a8d194ef 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 9c03584f1a 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 306438295f 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards a9338e0a3b 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 8a7af217ef 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards 40c73b37dc 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 6ecd459022 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d79c37f23f 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 2f71e7738d 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 6d161521c7 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 40c81e2883 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 81b389408b 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f81d20c57b 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards a55497702c 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards aa1d76efb6 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards 171718f3f5 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 1e18f87e31 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 5fb86978f6 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] discards 0ab82f7307 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 5822576e16 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] discards 04cfb6c0d2 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards afb8506027 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 564cff4371 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards c4c61c0b98 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards f196cdc82b 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards f359b758f0 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards b6a819451b 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards 9e61f0bdda 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards eab357f8b3 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 721c859c5a 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f9eb1920ad 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards a91ec69ade 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 54ddb37064 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards aed7d419cb 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5517749a56 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards dbf4f88ba0 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 71a242e33d 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards 4e593c2538 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards cd21aacdc8 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards a8ec66460d 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 91984eb442 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 85a0db938a 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards fc15f0c0ec 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 8e878c10b3 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] discards 28bf41ce30 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards b2c835e1ba 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 467b3b7111 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards d673f9e642 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 39d04bf8f4 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 6a8bded33d 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 8baf560182 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards b89ab0e684 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards 23f891a7cd 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 7b1061890f 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f342d0f548 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 8558fc18ac 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] discards 01146a6666 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] discards c57df7cc25 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] discards fb18df0e9f 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 57c41dd4f9 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 38ac3e6038 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 3782cc388b 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] discards cffa266c98 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards c45b63a9aa 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards f47406d4cd 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 5a086b6379 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards dee3805a22 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards c0129b775a 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards aa5a718521 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 783653508c 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 10a91d2026 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 770e461118 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 96b0393900 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards e69c9e8f6f 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 72b55b0ef0 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards 2ed76cd947 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards d323d3c957 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards b8c0a0d88a 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2d95f68573 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards c4601e61fc 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards 0a379c022f 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards 355966732c 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards a85af1a7cf 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 6128bee59f 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] discards 7e28604744 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 1e26b524c7 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] discards ae65e52d84 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new de04236b30 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d883d8bf9c 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] new 3461ac0769 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 2990d8153a 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new ddb2f997aa 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 419c6e174b 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ba4466255d 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new e6a04f15b5 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 699ebc1386 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new 12d13198ab 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 973a8d9cd5 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new e7e0dddfc7 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 0e1004edb8 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new 927f3f09e8 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new f88bc334c1 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new e7558de8ad 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b7bfe80410 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b22ec546be 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2d5a1982ad 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new 831db0aa59 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new a1cc24b36c 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 849715b001 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 40bcf6abb6 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 686c241099 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 45abb89a5a 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 04ab51f8fb 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] new 8a74785cdd 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new b340540cf4 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new aab3a3f3c7 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new d2b170e5b5 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] new 4b54bc51d1 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] new 00d1c6e8e0 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] new 3ce6f6e82f 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 20a73dc2f6 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 04b4ae6a0f 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 7892ed6483 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 3da83f842b 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 2059a89ff5 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 4ab9ec4f5f 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new b576ebc04a 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 50df7974da 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 38aeefef2b 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 58b018ffaf 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 75c82c281f 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] new b7fe532acd 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 4dbf78f546 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 844b8e3cd9 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new fa1605b250 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new f74cdf19c0 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new 54e96fb798 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new f561d28050 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new e6fe6608a7 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 5e6f9fa341 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bb0e0c33f7 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5cb998e057 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 94e074edf2 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new b753a10909 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 957f0a4729 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ae7ade428a 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new d7973ba7a0 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new a7b2e18557 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 488407ee0b 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 84a2bc3ace 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new d6afb7ab35 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 86d8d27c8c 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new 36e2dffcba 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 408dff83e7 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new dea0988074 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] new 679b66c4bd 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 62e3451a14 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] new 14fad5eae5 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new c5c0fc6d5e 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new c63b78b3e3 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new 548e7eeda2 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new 31f7bd1935 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new 30e1071890 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 149e15abd0 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 70ef011673 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e84b0c63b1 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 8a57f872e5 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 9c86f1174e 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5b1c2ff35c 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new f9f8bac668 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new 086a82cf90 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 01ccf773c2 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 7a23ce820c 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 969cbb5411 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new e7da03216f 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new df0013745f 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new cbee3347e0 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 46bb3282e6 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new dbbc7fe002 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 0c85cf9a11 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new b197bc0943 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 7687b5520e 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 74e2788288 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 92b8d0d977 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 391e54d03e 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new e8849f7e34 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 1fd40e8233 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 35d284a2f3 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8aebfda6dd 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (6ccf5dfad4) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2216 -> 2216 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2492 -> 2496 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28044 -> 27732 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 17944 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90620 -> 91160 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 70092 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7628 -> 7784 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234784 -> 234708 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 185892 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 215536 -> 213164 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 179152 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 140 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 138 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4156 -> 4148 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 189 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 17500 -> 17724 bytes .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 3 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 11 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 70 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 26 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 238 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2852 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3370 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 17503 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 612119 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 25706 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 838 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 134 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3199 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 252 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 252 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3328 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 244 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 8 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2683 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3295 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 273424 ++++---- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 572755 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30438 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 932 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2852 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3370 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 17503 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 612119 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 25706 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 838 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 134 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3461 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3846 +- results_id | 2 +- 59 files changed, 1130184 insertions(+), 1094446 deletions(-) create mode 100644 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz create mode 100644 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz create mode 100644 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz create mode 100644 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz