This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards f91e999c37 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 684deba667 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 668f502870 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 98cd8f3d2e 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f662794396 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d2ad63dcd4 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e41f2503fa 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 7dcd978861 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 426b3678e8 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b062f8e8d0 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 040c467d56 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 1c9a1b3ab4 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: n [...] discards c51efdf7bf 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 0e98bc1660 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 1d463b3d34 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards fac94458a4 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] discards 6115884fcf 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] discards d32a745f28 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 9439669c59 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards c3ae7bf7b1 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% a [...] discards d6c92ed318 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 174171715b 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards f9c921cddf 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 [...] discards ac3e39e25a 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 73ff1347ed 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% af [...] discards 6c47606d30 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 72ffbede8b 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 4ba2c7bab4 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d9fb4b1b0f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 73ea43c099 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 62f19bf9a2 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 3f9af93542 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards b91045ff28 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 558551aeb9 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8317050bba 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 48d8e1dad3 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards d9fccd2314 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK afte [...] discards 025e82c866 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 10d465ba4e 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 2a0fcf1e11 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 0659e14956 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 917665c1f2 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 94c5707b9a 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 183ee6608a 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 0be836653e 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards 8fb3286545 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards d8fc65e1a0 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 235b7fb457 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards bfc4dcc0ec 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards e875c24f42 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gd [...] discards ce01433bd6 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards c2a6cac623 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 18a8571f85 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards f2eb3c676d 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] discards 63943127d1 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] discards e73311bbc6 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards d84966cc27 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards cffa5ea847 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 [...] discards 1321fbc420 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 9aa61b0aa0 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards f1a50ef3a9 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-41 [...] discards 40cba34463 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 7f1c8e2634 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 3e8b112d0e 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 41c444a303 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 060ef5ef8f 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 82ea6005ca 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards c439b15445 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 6de167c1d9 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 6742068049 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0ee83b60af 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e8a1bacd66 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards b542b742d5 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] discards 9179520aed 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 4cd242033c 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 81a31fb9ae 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 97a4149ba2 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 5082230aa0 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 3ce4bc37c1 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 37f4c4188d 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 3293d85636 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-416 [...] discards 1fcfcff9db 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards fd738e0e4b 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7ca6595900 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9eee0514ca 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 922ac46ceb 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6 [...] discards 6afc6846c9 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 56f5c6d3d6 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f48e0c4f58 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b85bd04b37 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b6d15c9b95 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards 01d69afb2f 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 7a1f03c7b0 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2a01ea4cae 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] discards 1ff5eb788a 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 204033ba0f 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 96def7c02a 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 68215917ee 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards b61fc0a051 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] discards 56d658262e 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards f9b242b551 1: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 3a5c47729b 1: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 5f3e508b45 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 67e4b14e46 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] new 121dfae0e0 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 21311c3691 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new fd5ee2880e 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 3c5a3cd73b 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 98beb316de 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] new ba795bc433 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 46baa51993 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 1b0041ec9e 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new 9d2c3397c8 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 927d470fe6 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1b3fdc6753 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 880169cd64 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 3643f57a8b 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6 [...] new c1fa234957 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 67f8fbff05 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 334cf3b8e3 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 7e10d287a9 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 50583c50af 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-416 [...] new af6706036d 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new b0d25dc8d2 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1c101764d6 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new de557f40b5 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new d4c3a42820 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new ad199ba46c 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 2880e520db 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 6dc82d8376 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] new 32b4e4fc52 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 636ed5736a 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 99ab0a1f03 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 92db559e95 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2a569d9053 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0fa634f4d6 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c00f210683 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3dd9a4e9db 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 47103b9caf 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new a6a28bc8ac 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 330db0bc45 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 80b8896591 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-41 [...] new 970548d19a 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new fbc2d24ed3 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 6001dc01b1 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 [...] new 3e927968ad 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new c8aa127841 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new c0567fc5cc 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] new e099774065 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] new d28deb2164 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new b0e2d9f4b1 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 1163a8d51f 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new c03caad728 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gd [...] new b91be9dff0 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 9f0ce31b83 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 9027f9cc19 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new fb51a61679 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 3686a36535 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new e13aa58f88 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 3f613e0e5f 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 8a86e62565 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 140bda1202 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 266777fbaa 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 802e38b88b 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new af67b46a5c 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 380af1ca07 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK afte [...] new a78aecf791 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e20fc606c4 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 1b4e27692c 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b12efd2b24 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 2a03d38e0a 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 6da8da8094 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new b31440f000 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1e927a8448 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2d859ca3e4 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 660a0ca498 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 54ea94731d 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 2ad78022ea 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% af [...] new 65d2c0d251 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 355486cbd0 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 [...] new e3596361a0 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 17a9e0752a 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 1089d90374 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% a [...] new 1691c83f24 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new e76c5bc553 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 521ff5fc72 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] new 085df58ddf 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] new eb7f8363c7 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 2cb0321958 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new cb3f21b604 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 5576e26611 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: n [...] new fc89b9037a 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 1e206fb24f 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new c9e2c652be 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 442bec467f 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 0acd811ac6 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e0d4548b53 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ee3094e354 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 05f034d7e5 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2ed803b7df 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new c7b0889fc9 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new a14369b36e 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 8acadb3c97 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (f91e999c37) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2120 -> 2220 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2452 -> 2436 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28088 -> 28616 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90548 -> 90908 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8544 -> 7624 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233388 -> 234392 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 212512 -> 214824 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 148 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 146 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4136 -> 4192 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 7612 -> 6836 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.regression | 1 - 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 2 - 10-check_regression/results.regressions | 1 - 11-update_baseline/console.log | 74 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- mail/check-regression-status.txt | 1 - mail/exe.regression | 1 - manifest.sh | 32 +- notify/check-regression-status.txt | 1 + results | 1 - results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 77 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 38 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 706964 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 709436 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 38 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 40 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 194 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 700178 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 702618 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 20552 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 756 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 43 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 200 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 78 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3374 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 79 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 2 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 32 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 187 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 733304 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 748187 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 20872 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 712 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 40 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 194 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 700178 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 702618 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 20552 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 756 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 43 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 208 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3940 +- results_id | 2 +- 65 files changed, 2859451 insertions(+), 2917834 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/results.regressions delete mode 100644 mail/check-regression-status.txt delete mode 100644 mail/exe.regression create mode 100644 notify/check-regression-status.txt