This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.
discards 91e490046 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c95d077d1 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 0ada3cd5d onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards ca4a730b8 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9cb4fdb95 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f0a78bdf0 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 548b80f07 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 813f59672 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9963f8a5c onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards aa13676b1 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fadbd1834 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b65c33f96 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 72b4e1925 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 99a8b9a3a 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 8196f8c41 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 5c3cd8356 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 40081179c 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e6e94e8cb 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a823a5f90 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 33941925d 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 75278ec36 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8c81d44d4 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 73b7ff03c 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 495d10d78 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 0433edbce 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 403a618f3 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 46b72522b 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 5628508d4 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 5163cdc2c 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 4bdf2299b 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 6c8bc9c66 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards c21578d1d 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 8fc8cc3b0 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 7a117d246 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 0d811562e 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards e361409a1 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 06dbbccb3 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 0507fd0cb 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards e37919034 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards d438be42a 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 8ccf91e72 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 4d1756e1f 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 6d82c07cf 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d7b225140 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5b9c54094 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 44394ca70 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 1ed65e73e 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards f1524d948 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d7a9a5a40 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards b38ea64e7 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards f0c16e84e 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 0d7ff9d98 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 1bcfd082f 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards f233a40dc 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards d5c9e010d 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 7f7a93af2 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 5970bb66d 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards b3947f1b7 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards e02d13e01 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 95f364213 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards a68c7dcc5 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards bff919cd9 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 8a2f1e605 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 84913700e 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 91b1fa849 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards b3a4a77af 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 1d05b4b1a 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 16e44059d 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 5309a1b8f 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 7201b16eb 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 2a544f690 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 603640f4d 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards f4888861a 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 4354cf9a4 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 648c21c27 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 479bc9f39 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards e4bdc9fe3 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 53e472fdc 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 45e6a71bb 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 9b6065297 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 896dc4b67 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 8857b6bc3 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d82a7a642 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 04f7d74ac 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6bbb18e58 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6681b093b 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 4035ad6f1 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards a61f16a86 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 4e378b0c3 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 553ebd726 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards 4bbd18425 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 371dfd7ab 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards dca1a33dd 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 1415c8948 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 2366bfc74 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards c1e9630a8 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards dcd4ce9cb 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2a26adf81 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 60ff83ac8 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a60d4e021 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards 7400cba35 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards de760ec26 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4ead8ed18 onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 3082a61a8 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 1331b6dc8 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new af1584a02 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dad4b817b 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d738a0528 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0596f1934 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new a939797d0 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 2d903e1c0 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 61ca38b8b 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new aa037c21d 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new ea55e4faa 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 76672ef24 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 9e1191451 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 028ec26a2 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 1eb0164c9 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 5cf2f4667 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new e857ce6d3 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7b2d11565 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c760a7546 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2cd5fd34c 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 82d792137 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 0b381edf7 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c37b24fb6 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new bc7a7d4bc 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 8240d45f8 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 964327572 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new e904209be 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 277e84106 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 39d770c58 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 6d8bb09e9 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new cc5f90994 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 90fbd9e06 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 28f2297df 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 7affad497 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 8d5e4eab5 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 6b4f7162e 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new a6d3b50a4 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 86838bdf1 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 84fe55040 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new b51d5bb6b 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 0e22ae485 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 3849c8fa8 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 5485237d2 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 47b95c8cd 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 0658e07f1 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new dad768a3b 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 896028c7a 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new fc69bd57b 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 4f04a638e 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 14f4194e3 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 9f9c58959 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 9e8170034 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 18512893b 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 26e4115ee 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 25f0afc59 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 1b89de4e7 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 2f2d09552 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 3e28cf955 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new bc72de002 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6a4cce895 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 2e6f6cf47 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new dd54d711e 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 15315e5c6 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 79df5845a 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 0d1263778 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new dadb9c07f 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new ce22a7411 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new a7608fc02 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 76637fbe4 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 70063973f 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 1827098c8 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 124241425 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new c79cf2a41 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 737f37d00 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 39ee71c2f 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 795b12f56 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new ca29cf60e 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new f12e00a32 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d3b91b5db 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f7cabdd11 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3a9f6b22a 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 69c2ece63 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new cce009919 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e7fa9f9bb 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d5dc25120 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 94f652e88 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 0c7d956de 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c64c0f09f 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 45c8d9ff5 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2ae8a40ac 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 52a9f96a6 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 93dedcc17 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6de40f83e onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ec045f071 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 03e563806 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 01229a5ca onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 28794dc14 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 377817b88 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9cd6a2a9c onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c783d256a onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c10234057 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (91e490046) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: