This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.
omits 6554f3a onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits 3dcac98 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits 2443316 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 2379f5a onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 8cc9959 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 3b4ff11 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 7c15a03 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 1903228 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 8f02bcb onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits e21aff2 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits fac6ab0 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 027f319 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 4f23800 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits df61c41 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits abb8ac3 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits f9ceded 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 16b924d 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 4f87af9 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits fbaab9e 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits eccbe28 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 41a4dd9 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits bb6e258 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits c43afd0 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 08068e2 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] omits 1875439 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] omits d832dfa 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits 535a1c3 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] omits 21c995c 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] omits 6fea6ee 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] omits 29e1683 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] omits ba5fa56 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits 0d81d1f 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] omits 011c8e3 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] omits 007ab66 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] omits dc018c6 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits 7520d18 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits omits bc971d3 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] omits 9c0dfcb 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] omits eb29ae7 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits omits 76e26dc 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits omits 075bd97 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits 11aef0e 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 53a9eed 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits d98be60 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] omits 3ad8f98 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits f897597 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] omits 16e8482 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits cadaa13 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] omits 32c3aae 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 0950f23 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] omits 97ff41d 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 89984a6 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 586fe5e 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 45f0876 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits 0f0a3e2 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits cb4553a 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 84dc93d 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] omits c04d8ce 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits d9daf00 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits dbaca02 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] omits 78d37d3 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 33a732e 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits c36e1b0 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] omits e7dbd91 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] omits eee3598 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] omits 3afb733 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits 6dbfbec 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] omits 0e1693f 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] omits 944dc2c 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits c037d62 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] omits 9b76836 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits omits 8571fbb 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] omits cb14f23 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits omits 07252b4 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] omits 8d1a662 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] omits 25d4220 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits 64eb67e 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] omits b72f41c 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits eceeb2c 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 706bb5b 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits 9d1c458 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits d8b35ad 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 5624a1a 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 4cbaa56 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 1ec6d86 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] omits 8b1bc04 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] omits bc4bf17 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits omits 9adc48f 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits omits dad4755 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] omits 3c08930 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] omits 712612b 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits omits 911c227 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits 3c19de5 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits 7c5e91d 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] omits a087a5d 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits omits ffccb69 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 1fcb19b 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 55e7ab9 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 767183e 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] omits c3532a0 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 3af99d0 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new d7d806a 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 766e8e2 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8fc8620 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ee1a28a 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 548d9d6 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 48de4e5 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new d8afe3d 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 77165bb 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new e0354b3 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 9a15cc7 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new e671b45 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 865bb05 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new fbe3f16 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new d452c3c 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 67fdde9 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 371d914 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9343fb6 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b1d587e 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c968fd3 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 34ed8b2 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 8785d65 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7486cf1 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new bf61c6c 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new b736d54 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 6379c18 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new a764ed4 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 03595e1 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 07c9066 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 9c26ec4 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 6f7827a 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new c1710fa 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 71a2954 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 405cf4e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new ec01948 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 2c3a495 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new f885a6d 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new ca0d162 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new edea5c1 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 0c87e27 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 58dc152 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 0bfb714 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 1b18627 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 76aad48 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 05305c5 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new bb6306a 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e1ac453 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new f4f7434 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2db72d6 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 307545e 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 49ced73 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 05ca58e 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 525380e 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 7c65d61 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new cea6986 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 2dcaa49 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 9021389 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new bfc4997 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e6dbeae 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ace4212 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 5121a9a 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 98b823f 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new ee471e1 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 4d0129e 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 0649c3a 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 5cc886e 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new f71fd4f 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new af443c3 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 614a405 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 155c238 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 3268557 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 95f4e0a 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new f0e971b 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 21b3a93 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new f939e74 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new cffd024 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new d723078 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 7c100be 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 7589169 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 07724bb 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 98549a2 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 029affa 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 768c627 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5bc38d3 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 0114925 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 15d9daf 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2127b84 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 51e4f01 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new bacbc6d 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new aa8b8e9 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 946e9ed 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 478f147 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new dc1fe72 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 132f09f onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 11edd63 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3738083 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 72108ed onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new eda175a onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6add1a0 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c107640 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 7a30f71 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (6554f3a) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2632 -> 2608 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2688 -> 2640 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27984 -> 27728 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17836 -> 17820 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 93880 -> 92404 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 72280 -> 72356 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8692 -> 7832 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 235628 -> 235332 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185880 -> 186168 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 220412 -> 218824 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 184176 -> 183792 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 148 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 3484 -> 3428 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 6200 -> 6448 bytes 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 80 +- annex/bmk-data | 2 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 186 +- jenkins/notify-init.log | 72 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 20 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 6 +- manifest.sh | 4 +- notify/any.skipped | 5 +- notify/jira/comment-template.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 40 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/output-bmk-results.log | 258 +- results-vs-prev/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff | 7 + results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 35 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 176 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 18598 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 526019 +++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 175 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 74292 ++- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 571877 ++++++++++----------- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 64 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 188 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 75 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 75 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 75 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4860 +- 48 files changed, 590020 insertions(+), 607537 deletions(-) create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff