This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.
discards 2cdd157a5 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 52d4ce70c onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c618b56c9 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 3ce3cc29f onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a9d3c3a2c onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 022e30fa1 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0a0347635 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 201a23c33 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 284972f42 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 90ec4af6f onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3d8fe25eb 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 1ba628748 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 295f59d57 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 75a54c520 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 208ac16fc 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards f62d3fcb6 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b5a88c450 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 508d1df1e 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 67c2822eb 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7f0187ac0 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7fa72b4a9 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards df460f05d 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6cf4979b7 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 62b4f72fe 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ff4f12003 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 185a45d83 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards e15b270a7 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 2fc64e1ff 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 521bfa491 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards fdda2eb1a 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 7d6e29e38 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards c948258fa 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards c623a2e26 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 5dc8062dc 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 8bc89ec0a 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 5c8db5935 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards a34b4dad4 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards ffd75e6b2 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards c8e491c01 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 84213ffae 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 1311793c9 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards b04a13435 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 697e01300 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards bb9f95169 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9bf31b985 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards cbb12c581 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 316950845 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards d32264b73 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards aaec260c1 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards b3ebe5159 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 9830f1f9f 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 5495f78d3 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 31d4e2752 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 485e6bc34 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 9a116c2c9 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards b91da5437 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 0394cfb44 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards a3b547127 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards e29b268af 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards b9b04ca2a 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards a2395ee89 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards d2e46b94e 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 5c74bc26b 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 53d376449 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 7e347fdbd 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards aa7122f17 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 845639e12 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 066c691bf 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 3e9ebd4d9 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 535376927 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 1bc0c83aa 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 53d17390d 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 38bf55286 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 9231c3f1b 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards b3e91c470 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards a00443a53 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 70b4ffa6d 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 24b0cc3c3 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 760b5197e 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 714e5be1a 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 469fb08ab 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 5501b5323 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e1548c970 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ea3ca4025 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ad279ca2c 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6ef762e7f 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 092947350 onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new daabbd144 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 12bc75297 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 64b611db5 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 322f34558 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f8670bb59 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 2e2cb72bd 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8fffd679c 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new eff798ad8 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new bd9e7649a 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 2a19298f1 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 2fa19b445 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new f9cdfc39e 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new e72edd2ee 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 56288f736 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new ee486cda8 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 759251c73 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 3655d8dc4 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new aaa120a98 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 7069af15e 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 1e584405b 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 9abe4b317 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new d3ef646ca 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new cfe6791e1 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 0fc93806d 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new afbab4c6c 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new b1a75d37a 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 3f6888771 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new c3a544f2d 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new bb09ab14e 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new d208a168a 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e4c49afd4 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 856114435 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 7eff08084 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 55a9bbf78 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 32fb08190 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new a5769b6c6 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 16a6851fe 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 3b28066c9 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f67961d7e 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new aa26aa443 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new e0fd118f8 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 2fc107008 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 670d84464 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 345f4a411 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 9bce5d3c3 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 859ed98c3 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 137aba35b 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 9e62c15b9 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 271e1be43 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 877f8cbb8 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new f6a94dd97 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new c24f0e3a2 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 0572c144f 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 4e6b96de7 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 4c08e2dbc 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 601d9797c 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 2653dba12 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 001028791 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 0acf50d97 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new cc6793383 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 533eb40b7 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new d45595527 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1422d88b3 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 7097f606e 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4577e76a6 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a6cf289ab 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 512a83a06 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new aa5032bca 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c6e625ac2 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b039cbf5a 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new d32b863ad 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new f8aca1b27 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7c553134e 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e3427a640 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1b712a5a2 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e44661e6a onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a910fce1e onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a419fdfd5 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5e4580763 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 56756dcf6 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 985c71367 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 72483466e onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 60533cf89 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 4a621acbd onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 1b6b5117a onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (2cdd157a5) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 86 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: