This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-aarch64-master-O2_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-aarch64-master-O2_LTO.
discards 95b09cd onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 12a79ec onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ce71d07 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c62abb3 onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fbd7d1f onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9b00154 onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1f490fa onsuccess: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 92dda15 onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5e1e077 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b64e161 onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8820c15 onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c2c9fb3 onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 247ec4a onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards be5c8a7 onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 834473a onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 46e79da onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 503464d force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 7e6a7aa force: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards a2e00d8 83: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 06b8905 82: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2b71b4d 81: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7a2435d 80: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 89b83be 79: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ab5d8dc 78: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 75383cd 77: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 58c5894 76: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 4fad4bf 75: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2593a5b 74: force: #19: milc_base.default [...] discards c2f1168 73: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 340e712 72: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7de27bd 71: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 456 commits discards 204511a 70: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 892 commits discards 796005c 69: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 364 commits discards 0b24d60 68: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 227 commits discards bb96bc7 67: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 365 commits discards b794828 66: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 400 commits discards 3535741 65: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 263 commits discards 439bb55 64: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 403 commits discards 97b929d 63: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 87 commits discards 3c1c35f 62: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 536 commits discards 36b2077 61: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 616 commits discards e994775 60: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 64ba838 59: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 23dae3f 58: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0a82b09 57: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0ee2405 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0dac632 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 6aa51de 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -6% [...] discards be48323 53: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards eaf26b1 52: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 128 commits discards fda9386 51: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 7c12d94 50: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 253 commits discards 5fedfec 49: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% af [...] discards c5462d7 48: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 243 commits discards 9bd14b7 47: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 5d9fcbb 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards d26d7fd 45: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 22a078a 44: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 452fb02 43: onsuccess: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d47f534 42: onsuccess: #538: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 36ca025 41: onsuccess: #537: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 24c23af 40: onsuccess: #527: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc run OK after binuti [...] discards be743b0 39: onsuccess: #525: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 35ae950 38: force: #519: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after working-4297-gf [...] discards 25a0b52 37: onsuccess: #517: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b3e90e9 36: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 325 commits discards 36458be 35: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to run after llv [...] discards 685142f 34: force: #513: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 56 commits discards 564417a 33: onsuccess: #510: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7d7a97e 32: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp speeds up by -4 [...] discards f1ec1bd 31: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards eaa75c8 30: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards 5476ede 29: onsuccess: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards c2d1e1f 28: onsuccess: #502: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3943af3 27: onsuccess: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench speeds up by [...] discards 77f4f9b 26: onsuccess: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ef1abdb 25: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench speeds up by [...] discards d89f32a 24: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9f282f3 23: onsuccess: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f48e7e8 22: onsuccess: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 73b6e92 21: force: #493: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards a3dbbc0 20: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 40e2d01 19: onsuccess: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 18a9a6b 18: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7621b40 17: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK [...] discards 22a9cd4 16: onsuccess: #486: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7b41e7b 15: onsuccess: #485: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a8b5bda 14: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4858af1 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 714 commits discards f032c47 12: force: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build afte [...] discards fec0923 11: onsuccess: #480: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9aab09b 10: force: #476: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by -4% af [...] discards dee8842 9: onsuccess: #473: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 97243bc 8: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards 81a45b4 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 11 commits discards fe3490d 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 17 commits discards 520e797 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards 2e50254 4: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/gl [...] discards 9405d05 3: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc-llvm: 1 discards 5635daf 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc-llvm: 1 new a93455d 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc-llvm: 1 new b4edce6 3: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc-llvm: 1 new acfc14e 4: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/gl [...] new ba86ce4 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 00895f8 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 17 commits new ad7adc0 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 11 commits new d9197dd 8: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new e2d0ff7 9: onsuccess: #473: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4af96a5 10: force: #476: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by -4% af [...] new 9d6f094 11: onsuccess: #480: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 10c0424 12: force: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build afte [...] new 79caf49 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 714 commits new 229858d 14: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fd052b5 15: onsuccess: #485: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4d964c3 16: onsuccess: #486: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1249e15 17: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK [...] new 35bf1f9 18: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8360522 19: onsuccess: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e212864 20: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 648e874 21: force: #493: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new d9dd4cc 22: onsuccess: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dcf064a 23: onsuccess: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 30e820f 24: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b2d40c0 25: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench speeds up by [...] new db7049a 26: onsuccess: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3a27014 27: onsuccess: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench speeds up by [...] new a3e022b 28: onsuccess: #502: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2f88626 29: onsuccess: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new e59d35d 30: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new 53865a2 31: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new e40b230 32: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp speeds up by -4 [...] new c5a448e 33: onsuccess: #510: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2ca490c 34: force: #513: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 56 commits new 0029eea 35: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to run after llv [...] new dc6f574 36: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 325 commits new 6c7977b 37: onsuccess: #517: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3a7e695 38: force: #519: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after working-4297-gf [...] new 1dd4c97 39: onsuccess: #525: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new faf0f2b 40: onsuccess: #527: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc run OK after binuti [...] new c5d64bd 41: onsuccess: #537: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e632d65 42: onsuccess: #538: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c6ed6c0 43: onsuccess: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f726662 44: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new cf65049 45: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new ea65f99 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 387ba1e 47: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new af2572e 48: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 243 commits new 8849b52 49: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% af [...] new 37577ef 50: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 253 commits new bf15162 51: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 4% af [...] new 213e168 52: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 128 commits new 987d839 53: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 849a8c3 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -6% [...] new fb56896 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 950199c 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a2554d2 57: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 96fcda0 58: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 18cca55 59: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1d62953 60: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6e491ad 61: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 616 commits new 9ad1559 62: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 536 commits new a12478e 63: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 87 commits new dc09a21 64: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 403 commits new 2db8412 65: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 263 commits new fb385d6 66: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 400 commits new 5ce8fe5 67: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 365 commits new d017a53 68: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 227 commits new 3a8ba9c 69: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 364 commits new 72bb536 70: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 892 commits new c9fe465 71: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 456 commits new e54e186 72: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1621fb1 73: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new feb4e62 74: force: #19: milc_base.default [...] new 2369d39 75: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1f8e36f 76: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8d15aba 77: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c1b1d38 78: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 62740ed 79: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 005f1d3 80: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 354f340 81: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 930682a 82: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e3b3a08 83: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ec55bab force: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new b380fd0 force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new 906b618 onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9490a51 onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 50a9db3 onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 21d5033 onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 713db61 onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 90e0680 onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e2cada8 onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 305f52c onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a21df25 onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6c15bd9 onsuccess: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d2c0fff onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5091c19 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 072a82f onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 25d8c34 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 31e55cf onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4e17ecd onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7e63006 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (95b09cd) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2428 -> 2428 bytes 02-build_bmk_llvm/console.log.xz | Bin 105408 -> 106228 bytes 03-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 96 +- 03-benchmark/benchmark.log | 195 - 03-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 3320 -> 3312 bytes 04-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 13 - 04-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 5420 -> 5700 bytes 04-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 102 +- annex/bmk-data | 2 +- git/llvm_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 6120 +++- jenkins/notify-init.log | 70 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 22 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 6 +- manifest.sh | 6 +- .../extra-bisect-params | 0 notify/jira/comments.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 24 +- notify/mail-recipients.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/output-bmk-results.log | 1422 + notify/summary.txt | 1 - results-vs-prev/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 14 + results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 58 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 25 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 103 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 159 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 12285 +++---- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 20 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 27 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 99 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 229 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 36324 ++++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 22 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 48 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 113 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 58 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 58 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 28 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 58 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3052 +- 42 files changed, 33250 insertions(+), 27619 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 03-benchmark/benchmark.log delete mode 100644 04-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv copy {04-check_regression => notify}/extra-bisect-params (100%) create mode 100644 notify/output-bmk-results.log delete mode 100644 notify/summary.txt create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/bmk-specific-variability.csv