This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards f3ca4e6e96 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 6038befad4 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 1f0e03031a 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards f865d8bc9d 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1ce8253d14 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 994fe3ae35 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards b93e2ea665 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards af73471a9f 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 531692c7fe 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 3930612ae9 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 781f471db8 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 015e1e44a9 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards ce9bcd5ff4 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 393d834f0e 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 9b79910f8e 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards ac0b14c252 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards e59e7f14b4 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards db7c7551fc 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards c0d8d3b1a8 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 428313f7c3 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards b9124dc63e 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 76543b637c 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5bd957c580 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c06b1e4d43 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 7094e8f1d1 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 418438bfab 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 10560bd178 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 0edf9e47b2 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 571c0b5101 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d114c91c6a 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 8d45f45d53 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards a686f71ccc 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 88177304f5 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards 27ced8eb70 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards e251b5ceab 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b6e7042303 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards bd818dd8fc 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 54555013ff 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards eb0f0aaf59 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 5bb9788691 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 9010456836 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards 0bb2fb7bcd 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 6d073e2ee2 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 8b4fb338ff 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6bcc932703 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 3ccf716dcd 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 7dc5e42439 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 82b281b681 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards 3d23ec5b5b 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards 5e42c1b928 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards dec69197f4 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards d0c4848e62 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards ee5bd76ad4 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards c032120d9a 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 7e22adfe7b 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards fa8badb239 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards a70ee7dcce 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 3f97f81549 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 5f897d4da7 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b544bb5a7c 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 397d5ff911 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards 7d023e85d5 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5406281182 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a6443881e6 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 799f7265ca 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards c99ba79b01 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 5684c8f2d4 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 718ac17601 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards b97a88f489 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 2e13f6d61f 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 46c163fa02 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 52aed052de 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 656e6850bb 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 1d5bc6dd16 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 93448a84ed 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards afb8bcb3b6 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards c437021448 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards bef4cd2802 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards 8d277de069 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 31c0e03ed4 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards a656b624c0 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 73d88c80de 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards bd65331f2d 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards dd043a04a6 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards b32da126fc 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 9a2f1c9a21 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2e4533d2d5 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards ea52fae98a 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards bfc0354fed 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 35c659b8fc 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9679c8304a 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 9bb097878c 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 30cc92fa81 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 0b6aef3a41 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] discards 4ae67a0f99 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 07e4f24512 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 45cd841d47 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards e1e7255043 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards faa52b3387 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards a8a75f8c90 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards b4715fd5fd 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 7639552d72 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 79a0967c4e 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new e648ee445c 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new 1045abedeb 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new 5ec546838e 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 685bdfd2f0 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new daa67ada0c 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 5aa221a4e2 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] new d83736affe 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 12b1b22de0 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new f328aad078 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 4785445a14 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 08c6105ab6 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 8873e3c86a 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 53a6945df2 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 7aab5d52f1 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d905138558 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 09603a75d7 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new cf42c84cd4 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 5001c27ea5 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new 3e15730c5f 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 8fe29007b5 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new b86505d6c6 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 46444f88dc 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new 7ceb98fd9f 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 356ede975e 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new b1cde78cfa 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 4c30212093 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new e70a7e740b 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 5a6815f6dc 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 7fc76b5ba7 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c44b0c48ed 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new ad1704230e 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new b7de1ae29b 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 1a5df4f1ab 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new aec993f2b4 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new aeb4659c34 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 7cdf9d6585 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 5145d3ad97 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e8bfac7973 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7c33cb78ee 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new 90eb9b4a01 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 966118cc00 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 216cebc9bd 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new c81d6ddade 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new d93050a8bf 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new 754528a816 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new f8fa1abe19 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 27de8e931b 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 5965a43d06 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new 6bdceb932c 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 8dfdd2e007 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 75fdf03244 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new 03ec3e0466 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new 472d8163a6 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new a3c5982f4d 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 94a2f1e264 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new c32b56730b 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4c848704a9 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new a08e651f6c 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 42f5620f64 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new 0ff68447e2 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new dead0d675e 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new e6a0c5aa96 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new c3167cdf17 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 14e11fae2b 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 27c76dcbda 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b1b07a5959 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new aae116daf3 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new 9c0c95e60d 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 2a46ec7e3d 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new cfafc64765 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 522e17247a 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 671720f5d5 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 57ce0eaa25 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new 30c08935c9 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 03a6d0fd89 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new adfd33fbcb 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 3a8c1f3e21 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 84b714652c 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 13bc77927a 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 646e200a2c 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new 0c5fac3b91 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 7443bb9432 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 9b86499d87 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4aba35aa2a 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new bb6cab4b65 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new 7b532fa201 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new d3ff577b4d 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new db0b62169f 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 205cf8962a 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 340bbcd0d0 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 148189c02d 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8b6276b6ad 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 82061ad7d3 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new fd28027ed7 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8db9f982dd 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f33b95d825 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 27c6e6f547 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 1a85bf06de 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new bdaf833450 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new c6003e3987 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (f3ca4e6e96) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2212 -> 2184 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2488 -> 2488 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27912 -> 27344 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 91932 -> 90340 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7728 -> 8392 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234236 -> 233640 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 213288 -> 211148 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 172 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 170 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4196 -> 4188 bytes .../437.leslie3d.symbols-regression | 6 - 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 177 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 19184 -> 18900 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.regression | 1 - 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 2 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 3 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 3 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 9 +- 10-check_regression/results.regressions | 7 - 10-check_regression/symbol.regression | 6 - 11-update_baseline/console.log | 74 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- mail/check-regression-status.txt | 1 - mail/exe.regression | 1 - mail/symbol.regression | 6 - manifest.sh | 32 +- notify/check-regression-status.txt | 1 + results | 7 - results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 235 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2790 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 710650 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 713982 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28946 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 64 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2826 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3355 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 754528 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 757679 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28906 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 60 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 131 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3259 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 249 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 249 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3264 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 243 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 21 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3099 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3406 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 773369 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 776528 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28492 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 74 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2828 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3355 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 754528 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 757679 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28906 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 60 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 131 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3463 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3792 +- results_id | 2 +- 73 files changed, 3038453 insertions(+), 3114028 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/437.leslie3d.symbols-regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/results.regressions delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/symbol.regression delete mode 100644 mail/check-regression-status.txt delete mode 100644 mail/exe.regression delete mode 100644 mail/symbol.regression create mode 100644 notify/check-regression-status.txt