This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-Os_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 0b66e5bd13 108: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 7cafbcdd73 107: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 693df7f55f 106: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1e524edcec 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards d0650c8e8b 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 73fd1a42f4 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 292f9d334b 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 89c0cf119f 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 6f157165c9 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 3967977675 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 163d81ab1a 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards fd79b11764 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 30f079fd0d 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards fa8b934fac 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards bfb44fa717 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits discards 82ccaddf23 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] discards 0c0fce6b63 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits discards 21def46d34 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] discards afdc275504 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 0f765c959c 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] discards 6189ddad73 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards f20fd726aa 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 12c00997e2 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits discards d3332a54cb 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] discards 78d963428d 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits discards 0e1d70bf24 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 417933a77e 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4a812b6484 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards bc422ada0f 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 41f62dc043 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 61a020b905 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c2cd9d5556 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards dfb43ae442 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7e9ff89399 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 93b6d6c508 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c16bec5875 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 053cce968a 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards baa1ec0d97 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3fdca266ed 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 257b65c13d 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 43b0d2ed54 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9c3a138495 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards ec00b6b5a4 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards efcab7f887 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 28316f449c 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 88dbdc95cf 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a4e4ff54a1 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] discards edf0220ec0 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a01db80940 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4c62c8e7a2 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0498b28637 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 583e2c465c 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards c02092a451 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 68f6b6e535 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits discards f63f422a5a 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] discards 8465348556 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits discards ead980e3d3 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] discards 36143c889f 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits discards c1b399e8d9 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 77f49a1d9d 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits discards 22b806ca3c 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 2094387b4e 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 2184db64f4 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] discards 08b2d14d63 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 43c3bb8200 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 4353cec905 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] discards 0a73dfce23 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards 73d0319aca 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards 71245fd080 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 28eaf93ce4 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards de6cf8da14 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0927272711 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 42d0f70f07 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 852ae21e43 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 775e422e6a 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ceef93da54 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9223acc4c2 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e8bf6ed2a1 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8e05f705ec 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards c5782c290a 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 543117b8f3 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits discards fcbac4c9eb 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards 5b17dff643 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits discards ac27273be9 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] discards a59d51d24a 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 37e2273372 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 9fd400471a 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7726823ddb 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits discards d6215483e5 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] discards 58e9edcca2 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits discards f793450191 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] discards da734b9a2d 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits discards 291a903dbd 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 4b18c92124 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-39 [...] discards 790a4ca647 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 commits discards 6fa368755f 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gli [...] discards a817a71562 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards a9ae119c66 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards cf19b1bac4 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/ [...] discards 1191415dc0 9: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] discards cdf70085c0 8: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new c6c9f953a2 8: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 89c194507e 9: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] new f43c95d255 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/ [...] new eebd11da73 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new d4efcf141a 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new 1073a4473f 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gli [...] new ee75ab1cf7 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 commits new c42338ea1b 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-39 [...] new 3614579eb3 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 48a3d74170 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits new 834f5211f6 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] new 7db3104a7e 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits new 7ffa709725 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] new 1b82f93a74 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits new fdbd1f5e63 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d145f1212b 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 8639e722e7 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 03784b21e2 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] new 51cd1efe0b 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits new 0dd4ba0a67 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new 16dc00b039 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits new 68789cde9b 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new cb0384e35e 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new 26c0550619 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c82d6a1015 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 00db0fb6ad 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 53e7c0f6f2 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f04c883ea3 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f40bbf1acc 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3775f4ecaf 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 879c26a4d5 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 9e449281a7 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 56ad61199b 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 8d76351f89 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new e4f9b327f3 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new df7c7b442b 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] new f35b155072 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4f50d41632 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 7a7b5b36c7 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] new 499ad54495 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new c0e50b8356 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new b17b61e83e 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits new c1282d9682 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new c6eb9c4505 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits new becc4ce2e8 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] new 8c8d22314e 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits new 5902d1b55b 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] new 86200027d5 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits new ebae70affb 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ad6caa46b5 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 8b6cfb24ee 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c2c097585e 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 78da72f669 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4df6aa8169 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4c3854ed3b 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] new d12a25cfe9 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9a301abc3c 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9820862ead 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d35562c056 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d5ac34f80d 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new dd4c3a06d9 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 70928bebbc 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 77f6a34aff 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 80fadd220d 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 60b65b07ce 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f8bdd141e3 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fccf809720 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5033dd2dac 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c738f11ab1 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new dde18bb49b 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d0469dc710 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e61c103617 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c3a383dc00 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e629acb550 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4236e8d246 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c908655010 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 509c28c197 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits new 2b81eb8e60 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] new 5292767820 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits new 5c405d9a46 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new edcfe8148a 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 293be83186 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] new 006fde39a5 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 7547edf3cc 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] new df6cbb7ed0 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits new a65b77e7fa 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] new a6ce92ef56 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits new d323ac1490 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 1000022f21 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 96fd7dc210 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 61895450f5 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ebbe94bc37 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 02bd058b3a 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new fbe5a96ff2 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 867047015e 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 4b16ed2d95 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 91ed32aaee 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new a7ebed4ee7 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new a6874efba8 106: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 7023bfd9d1 107: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 071c0deed3 108: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 3db1d217ce 109: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (0b66e5bd13) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gn [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2208 -> 2240 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2460 -> 2420 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27300 -> 27896 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 72204 -> 73804 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 332 -> 332 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8356 -> 7660 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 242528 -> 244348 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 176964 -> 180188 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 109 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 107 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 3988 -> 4028 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 24 - 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 8284 -> 8152 bytes .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 2 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 70 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 32 +- {mail => notify}/check-regression-status.txt | 0 results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 58 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 16 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 376078 +++---- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 444706 ++++----- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 16 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 16 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 42 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 151 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 928465 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 931170 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 42 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 36 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 1 - results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 69 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 161 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 74 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 74 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 2512 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 75 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 4 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 147 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 928468 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 931194 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 36 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 151 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 928465 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 931170 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 36 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 1 - results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 71 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 171 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3428 +- results_id | 2 +- 63 files changed, 3203908 insertions(+), 3203879 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff rename {mail => notify}/check-regression-status.txt (100%)