This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-Os_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 260ae57b201 111: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards f6aa2446b68 110: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards c269af3f655 109: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 74aa28b70ab 108: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 5a3c8b11d55 107: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards af8fb975d02 106: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards f92b15be879 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards d3a797a1ada 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 1465e154695 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 34398428125 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards ddd7233e77d 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards a62dbb41a48 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards d309ef6d890 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 4629f95f717 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 8df959317a9 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 133e2944ddf 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3dd3e8164a4 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards ee6f8c0fb0e 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits discards f29f1487bda 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] discards 979f7af9c46 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits discards ef3b4c87573 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/lin [...] discards c0514de4ec6 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards ffff2246ba3 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-484 [...] discards ef1628f1c0b 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 6c48d2fe083 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 48a192e34d1 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits discards d668cfad615 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards 20596928a1a 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits discards 9641818e36a 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] discards 49d56802c5e 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e74ffb3383c 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 503d54b9b46 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 95a471b0784 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8d2b9c7324e 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3f62509f5d1 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 375e52cdfd9 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0d9a78d49ff 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 733c34e5d1e 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f554e02c3ab 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 37d337771b8 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e3b0fb6cd1d 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e6051dde356 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d8651b7829d 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 60281664036 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2b383568bbd 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c814e97c800 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f4609138e7a 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2886180f991 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3212989db9f 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards bf9954515e7 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size b [...] discards a43bc7bdd0c 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 22baa0d6570 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c0862391ca2 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5be06d464ad 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 0e0497f0111 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards bff30721acb 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 96d464a8ee7 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits discards 8937bb1c262 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% [...] discards 08f097cd986 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits discards 97c8464993b 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 11 [...] discards 6cb01e2100a 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 [...] discards cb37b4398a8 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards c3f2c5ff505 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 [...] discards ef91279987e 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 4f94dbc458b 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 00f48086fa7 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-41 [...] discards 198211d2703 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards b6e1593415f 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 5cd5e5df0a6 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in siz [...] discards 3ec9a90280f 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in s [...] discards ed39f822ecf 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by [...] discards 27271227bda 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards b6a19d92121 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards ee30bfa7755 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards ded2cfb979f 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 9c79c23621b 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 8e5c8dfbdce 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards a85ad5b5cb9 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 3847c960bec 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards de0fae9ec80 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 733fdf9b9fc 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 19e0506265e 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in s [...] discards 3b4f5416fbb 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 6c516e68134 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits discards 355b404daa3 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by [...] discards 4bcdb7c0e3f 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits discards 43837f6f8f7 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-3 [...] discards a53f987e45b 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 03b28995e20 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 2051027a01d 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 9fed75c6cf6 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits discards 063703e1960 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] discards 35caa02369b 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits discards 454c18f2bcd 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-3 [...] discards 804ec5ec439 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits discards 8d3b6db6e7f 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 21dce0a60e2 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-3 [...] discards 2209ecf05cf 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 [...] discards 9f7af94aad5 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gl [...] discards 8309c032565 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/li [...] discards c7a8aa69e15 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/li [...] new 0d6b5a1da7a 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/li [...] new 23773ed6037 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/li [...] new 7735fe28cb4 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gl [...] new 419bbdae1f8 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 [...] new a730420e6cc 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-3 [...] new aa39b71d5e6 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new e7db4032780 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits new 2661bdfdbed 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-3 [...] new 72e0d84a9d4 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits new ff1e8d3e20c 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] new 92f1359e0d3 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits new 675999b1864 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new e6b55ac6349 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 2f440122a51 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 4ed26bfafd8 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-3 [...] new c43ca115a22 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits new 10e5cd6e3cc 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by [...] new 706862d3c36 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits new 04de2b712b4 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 8f7d79ce2fb 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in s [...] new 8a76f3a1869 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new a18fdc8e116 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 2d799887115 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new a6ae72bcb7b 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 86a9022c54c 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new e377e8e6988 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 1eb02ca8be8 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new aa325e1ed10 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 1f908463fa7 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new c76e3a8fe78 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 0fef5413a69 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by [...] new ce5c8100b63 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in s [...] new 53cd46705e7 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in siz [...] new f1829e8d19a 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 7b9fb1fa030 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new eae7fe28714 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-41 [...] new 44cf0c43c7f 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 86d0025b772 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new d37c2465c6a 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 [...] new cb2bf30084d 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 33c297a931a 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 [...] new cea29c87534 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 11 [...] new 091ae26ccf1 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits new 55a8af62e34 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% [...] new 18230b20654 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits new 8a22f321bd0 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 063693a0152 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new c1f61f0847e 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 3288c0a6e78 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 954e37e46a9 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 927c619fe94 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d957089dded 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size b [...] new b60208c678e 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 30c95248ffd 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e4a7b39eca4 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5494ec82df2 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 47b38277ea3 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f6832ce6e4b 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 155c8bd875a 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e2f9f1a54a6 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0d7d2852547 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b36a9ac1d5c 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ce9a8e4ae9e 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 8878d9df052 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b867dbf83e7 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ad911c7a4af 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ba1fb3c8276 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bd9eaca4674 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 20be199f3c1 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b7ae918e5aa 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 58ca860c0f5 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b1524865469 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f082be5d272 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] new 203407bc3a7 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits new 2e222a9760e 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new 53f2f868b48 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits new 92414536ca3 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1c5886d52c5 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 54a6261ba78 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-484 [...] new 75b928a84de 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 6ec8bf4434d 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/lin [...] new 99a513c373f 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits new 7030b7baa46 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] new c0ce0c32672 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits new f46d464c807 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 4ec8f601ff1 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new de22b877477 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 30721b48813 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new db8d34ddea6 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 1995d4ca5db 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 7a13c5dee2d 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 293cc23f2fb 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 9f870d4dca7 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 85f3d4f08b8 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new af507f3844b 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new d724c869b0f 106: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new c591687f936 107: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new f402d5bf600 108: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new ad086b9da5b 109: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 1d359c1bef9 110: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 8d03a5efcd4 111: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new b68e475c3b4 112: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (260ae57b201) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gn [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2208 -> 2124 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2484 -> 2544 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27980 -> 28840 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 18324 -> 18156 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 73312 -> 72100 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 52916 -> 52932 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7676 -> 7856 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 243856 -> 245176 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 194664 -> 194640 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 178800 -> 180480 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 146356 -> 148124 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 109 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 107 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4068 -> 3992 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 8296 -> 8316 bytes .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 1 - 11-update_baseline/console.log | 72 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 36 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 67 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 468928 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 144 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 924 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 812 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 164 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 74 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 74 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 2887 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 81 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 2 + results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 148 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 38542 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 38515 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 144 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 924 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 812 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 72 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 174 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3326 +- results_id | 2 +- 48 files changed, 278701 insertions(+), 278673 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff