This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 6ea7706793 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a9740a314b 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 248c5170fc 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 26df6bdd65 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7e9eb8a9b9 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 8dc504e6f7 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 6d09e10cdf 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards b5746bbca3 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 3f8fca38c2 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 70e6bad45f 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards cce551b60d 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards a06ab9e0af 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 9f314dd958 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards e361cba9d6 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a33921f923 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4822a76726 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards a1e23eab03 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards f50f22e1e4 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 681050ef3a 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards a47cadd84c 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 03ec26d963 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 096af5117f 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards cac76eabd7 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 5e26a8d3e3 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 29431ab115 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards a02e41238d 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 88c4dab984 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b039e3763b 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c615e9b21e 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 7b1ea730f3 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 8c29ba9473 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 6595bc94da 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards f4e0057cbe 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards 6e8b4dbdcc 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards d0d747110f 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d692a42a40 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5c3e0b3e35 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 7df1710510 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards e23f4a24e5 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards a1d60e8b80 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards b07c1357e8 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards d586793c9e 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards d24f57f032 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards c4af87984d 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards 1c99879a49 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 9ce386bc35 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 1cdd6c1e09 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards a89af94495 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards 1d855fd2b9 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 8d47f708c9 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 7f639318ab 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 4522901254 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 000cdd8930 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards 01b2e73e95 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e83d8c76cb 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e864075d53 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 1151bfa154 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 6c05209191 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards dd8d7fb631 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards eb8020a1f9 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 9df2195377 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 8e32baedab 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 5516a547f8 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards eb212c7d4e 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 0365fdda49 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards af9313f64c 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards efad94282a 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 7ca8015df7 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards df62d4f18f 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 5830897f3a 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards ee8e910e2c 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards ee31a729e3 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards ba621e6b2f 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards da2da11202 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards 3fb9900a95 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards a4c09822ac 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards 0d9670dd05 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 19e099e43e 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8d655c7ffd 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 1cd0201c49 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 54dc5ecb10 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards e279329c47 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 59e623293b 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards a94e28ca65 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 6231e2b9e2 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards c745489b21 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] discards 9ab326f7b1 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 0d5d25082f 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards ca80c87123 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 2abbffe560 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards b5130a7b1d 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards 1c5179b604 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 1538513028 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 7dd577fa6d 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] discards c767acc122 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] discards 035c70e44e 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards ae3174f2ac 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards e05de5c279 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a6d0415786 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0777b487b5 5: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e20566bb8d 4: force: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 1d5a017811 4: force: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new db00c0c006 5: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 945aff4c9d 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a0ad456927 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0320873083 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 74aef28262 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new cb319e0364 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] new fa8f903642 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] new e5ffc55ba7 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 5c9f5f220a 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 3276d023b1 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new 315709bc74 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new b236061767 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 2c554b9022 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 86c063d12e 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new e1d7118843 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] new 23786edf39 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 6900b7d9f7 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new b4de1bf8cf 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 9f93b81a40 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2aba97cd6f 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 64fd452518 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 19ed25b8ce 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new ac06fc3321 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4eee15a14c 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new a66cd44e6e 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 3d5150ef90 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new dc478d1646 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new bd81ab23ea 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 0d552acbc2 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 2063dc6fee 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 55663bc800 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new 75896f5adc 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new f3de4809c0 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 1d303ad13a 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 25c31e1948 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 4d5a9c42d6 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 4e1e3df073 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 76b48d5284 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 99f2331836 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 625765b938 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new a3a6a4f184 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new b1bc1d352b 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 2754ecc3ca 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 4e8e54df1a 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 311790043a 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 4fba5732ac 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4f63207e99 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new dfd73f4cf0 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new ef19dfb007 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 17c0e1beb2 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2ef1477cfa 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 040a8a2483 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new 33732988e7 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new f7a7c039f9 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 2805522b4d 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new c12cba0e99 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new fcbb2d7827 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new 8b085b5b3f 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new d7f782de35 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 7bcbcb3439 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new b101fca975 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new ded18382ce 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new e54fca4335 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new bb61cfa5e5 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 1fef0e8679 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e1fcab4b3d 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new fd0f8c4553 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new ac9e37b7c9 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new fd6b3b8595 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 7583a4e5a3 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 53c42e3476 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new d44260b86a 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new df423edb5d 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 68b32a9c6d 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4581095e29 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new cc0ec5e48d 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new 59eb16480d 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 7474f12500 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new d2f53b8dc7 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 0844b880fa 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new a59bffa242 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 438df0dcda 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new bb6610d4a5 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new e1bc949674 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 0e69e1b57a 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new b63d05ec8b 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 25ce7e85f1 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d64b8ca55a 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 23b207301f 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new d3b154675c 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 780c638528 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 1ec3bc869f 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 07870021ab 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 3ae06a6ba0 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new 9e62534d49 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new 93cec4390c 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new 8509eb38bf 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new dbca03449b 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 03bafc9e57 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 35219ebde2 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 3b2a7af9e6 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (6ea7706793) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2056 -> 2012 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2504 -> 2516 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27568 -> 27028 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 89376 -> 89908 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8452 -> 8304 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233484 -> 233524 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 211768 -> 211764 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 183 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 181 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4340 -> 4360 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 175 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 16752 -> 17120 bytes .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 8 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 3 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 72 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/notify.sh | 2 +- manifest.sh | 31 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 237 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 26 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 26 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2912 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3411 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 58934 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 724845 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 25330 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 66 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 165 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3216 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3404 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 243 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 9 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2796 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3399 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 55717 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 761698 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 24536 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 58 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2916 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3411 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 58934 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 724845 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 25330 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 66 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 165 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3468 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3864 +- results_id | 2 +- 60 files changed, 1249488 insertions(+), 1246352 deletions(-)