[Tcwg-commits] [toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (cc1d5f79 -> 3faa200b)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards cc1d5f79 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards ab024f5b onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 39bcca09 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 45975adc onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1f0a122c onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ed3d5b9f onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 39bfade1 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 985e779c onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 04650575 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 989a72ac onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e054b276 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 6112f66b 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 29f27231 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ef18874c 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a3aeef7d 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards d878a5cc 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards bf559cd2 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d83f1fe3 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards cadb3ac9 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d10f1345 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a0e4fae5 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 917096c8 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 036f043a 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b72a0cad 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7e93ddbe 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards ef5267b7 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards d29ba14a 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 4794446f 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 32ff82b1 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 731d4825 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards ac751d2c 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 896cb0fa 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards d8897c6d 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 56bfe53d 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 7c502621 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards fa12fa63 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 2ef14c80 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 175b2d3d 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 8487ae3b 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards de4c96e2 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards b8753157 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 7da9abbb 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 301c8c1b 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d21cf101 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards de2b636d 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 45c8375e 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 5122ec21 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 92b5d392 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 49d31cc1 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 5256b927 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 62e7f7d4 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 6949ce7d 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 74896fd9 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 47bb5b3a 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards fab9e9c7 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards f246d836 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 027348d3 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards bfa3c957 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards ddb2f960 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 54571c53 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 978d07bd 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 41d70a78 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 313a678c 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards eec6bfd8 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 0e98cb91 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 3429823d 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards fc22ac48 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 77ac9ab8 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 78385bf3 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards a9130fe5 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 13457790 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 0c7ca643 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 220f017c 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards da900aa3 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 55d535be 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 712a6373 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards f43d315a 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 88dfe7a1 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 0b3dcacf 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 6d260bdd 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fe039bf7 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards a3eb8505 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f797f868 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4ab0cc99 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 55d76e93 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b3f6fcbf 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 2bf358c9 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 1976e33e 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards ccce4e21 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 928b46f1 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards ec505de2 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 6d0aabe8 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards e34db235 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 9ac1fc9a 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards e521d85a 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 11b1f790 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 293df4f0 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 380a78c6 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 53cf41d7 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6f3864d8 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards d0680ea9 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 13c226dd 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e9d46a93 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 24616597 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e6a30389 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new 694c201d force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ [...] new c7f16070 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 67faca39 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 55a18b52 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e3e38c8f 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new cfe43e94 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 5acc9218 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 39a24b4c 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ad1f2c85 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1cb8accf 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new f78cbff0 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new fee63548 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new dcf2a6dc 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 31ca76fd 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new b794ff26 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new e3b561d7 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new f9d0f38d 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new ba4669c0 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 5ea155b6 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 9f9fb4c0 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 13af6022 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 96e5ed8a 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8ee3640a 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b743f02d 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 286a07ce 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new b9cd6859 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 84e2269b 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 9cb53736 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new ad829b04 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 0188b5ba 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 9eb23a8a 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new ce372f39 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 2c5c98de 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 5115f087 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 141d0a4b 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 61d1f468 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 7bef9e4e 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 8d257e4a 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 05c17b1f 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 86a63f9e 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new e6e07e3e 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 4800ef36 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 7ddabe31 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 1f1d35f2 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 090ef80d 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 606441dd 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 05b2d544 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 6cd8abd7 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 1b2890fb 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new dadcd781 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new fefb1ca3 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 6e1acc8e 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 08b676cf 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 00b2b63f 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 74a08267 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new f75c2142 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e5c66fee 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 8d384d2c 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0380c1af 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new e73f4f56 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 28f907c2 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 71ed78fa 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new bba864c2 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d52b92e5 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 51e50294 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 959a1f5f 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 7a099ac8 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new d945a7db 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new f0cdfe36 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 7ff7a475 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new c7ae513b 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new a9f61ba3 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 50e2f76c 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 5e8e5abe 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 2d3c6cc2 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new c7d74c26 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 698f6635 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 01a89e02 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 7f7ad5a7 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 8435388a 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new d2cca222 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new d8b39f93 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 839b10b1 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d461052d 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6f9d1b0e 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c2ea0260 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d52e2fc9 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 518ac8e1 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4ac7df6b 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2007b92e 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 46d7d8c8 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 053b9397 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 55fcfe7b 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e77ac9b7 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2a17a00e 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a9005f45 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f724b61a onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 711b1722 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new caa839a6 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e48bd7fa onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7c8379c5 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 444cb7aa onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2dab932d onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 1a515f45 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 3faa200b onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (cc1d5f79) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 105 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: