This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2.
discards c446a3d7 onsuccess: #103: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 331b4d93 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards e4f2aa18 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards e943f94e onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards ed38bc55 onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fe7873d6 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards dd5bf804 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 70847303 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e02c1bd3 onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fa1b3749 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards bc870809 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 08421eaa onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards db38bccc onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b39624f2 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 3668a206 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards fe22bd72 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 768b49d4 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 0bb2379c 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards bf6fdba6 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 6ffeed50 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 6dc29b95 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 37f2a33c 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 63bcd5b5 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 60839d70 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 12081cd4 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards afb0d8e6 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 43126d33 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 478a7d9a 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 08a8fbee 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c77f8df7 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 93877abc 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462- [...] discards 11bdece1 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 3f04c699 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 commits discards b6784d33 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 2fd75ae9 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 203951bf 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards 6360ca6f 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 58 [...] discards 671f3928 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 9c83622e 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] discards d7b23a78 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2ef3e4a5 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f021c800 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards cedd5e6e 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 4cb4eec2 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 7f72c38e 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards bcf862d6 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] discards 520a768e 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards bce34fb4 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% a [...] discards ae25bc74 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% af [...] discards efacd741 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% a [...] discards a0825bac 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-45596 [...] discards b71ffb5a 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -21 [...] discards 145b660b 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 49d86dc5 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f495b9c0 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 58e0bf33 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 5619491c 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards da2548a5 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 2ded0607 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step_ [...] discards 23bbcd5b 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 08356baf 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards be4d8378 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 229c5d09 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 9ab1a204 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] discards dfacb271 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 30bebd4f 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 commits discards d4cbb671 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slowe [...] discards 15793468 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 7bf22f29 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards d8e8f7a7 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpoi [...] discards 004ba977 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build af [...] discards c3136281 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 07cf6d82 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 50de03be 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 64505 [...] discards 20860183 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] discards 7106f6fe 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 89b62295 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards e57280e8 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after gd [...] discards de10f63e 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bin [...] discards 05c58591 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards bbf7e6b7 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5806e570 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards afff9d2e 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK a [...] discards 7f340226 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 3c69b3f0 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards dd01d1d4 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run O [...] discards ba93b2ef 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK afte [...] discards 78bb6f39 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 48a01646 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards db50c0c4 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 53a7952b 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards a300412b 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 4b25805a 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 1abf5052 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 77214210 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 0 [...] discards 1f470dd0 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards 838223c8 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 51fe4b5c 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 1218a4cc 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 2a028673 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21% [...] new 2f9e2512 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21% [...] new ac6cf63d 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new fe0c7a29 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new f8b8dc33 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new e62162db 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new ed68c2f9 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 0 [...] new ec53e932 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new cb559101 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 91d59c03 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 496f5354 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 470d6933 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 6d11ba05 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 30d1ca1b 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new fc125543 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK afte [...] new 8612995b 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run O [...] new 2df1d5c8 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 2079110a 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 2cea6d9d 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK a [...] new 3afd441d 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 41b401f5 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c1ed84b8 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 3b24e1db 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bin [...] new cb369889 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after gd [...] new ca444d9f 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 6128287d 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 507a9b01 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] new 520973c0 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 64505 [...] new 776da7ac 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new f67483a5 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 0e1566bd 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build af [...] new 53f3755f 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpoi [...] new 69b8ccf1 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 1724ef35 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new e4b21e59 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slowe [...] new ff4372f8 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 commits new 58c12bba 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new f27e836a 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] new fa7c6574 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new eca9eccc 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 2bede887 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new e97fa764 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 4564cd36 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step_ [...] new 3ef80498 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 2d2b48b0 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new be0481d1 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new f1e89a91 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new a71b9b9e 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e5be42ef 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4c07f49a 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -21 [...] new 6f71bb53 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-45596 [...] new edbb76a5 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% a [...] new 340f67af 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% af [...] new 8af6e69b 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% a [...] new b9a04374 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 4d96f1ad 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] new b43e2e03 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new 1982c04b 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new afb76773 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 1c148ec3 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new b76d8aab 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4b01d75b 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 27bff32e 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] new 073fc9db 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new 92bfc0fd 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 58 [...] new fe688619 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 418397c2 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f220f8ee 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new f99001d4 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 commits new 0af1f0d4 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new 6a210592 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462- [...] new 016f9a34 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new cbac0d77 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a6acd1fb 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 44a5ff02 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 4a3173e1 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a01f3492 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a59abb5d 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 12db1857 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 43d22fe4 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3b2520ac 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new f9978d0c 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 07c81756 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b2fd6f6e 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6f40e8cf 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ef0dbadc 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 99f20349 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e9f4f766 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 554e4199 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 17b7d819 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 200ac61e onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1245bd71 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a3260b24 onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 16b85b75 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 06a01ba4 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4e43ca1f onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new caca72aa onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 38a3031a onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 747733bc onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 64b99e73 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 2fc9da00 onsuccess: #103: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 583f311c onsuccess: #104: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (c446a3d7) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2568 -> 2596 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2740 -> 2644 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28528 -> 27432 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17528 -> 17708 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 92628 -> 92560 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 71972 -> 72452 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7880 -> 8592 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234672 -> 233096 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185680 -> 185168 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 218392 -> 216312 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 181368 -> 183920 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 117 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 188 - 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 3456 -> 3476 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 113 - 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 6656 -> 6636 bytes 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 586 +- annex/bmk-data | 2 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 1084 +- jenkins/notify-init.log | 122 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 26 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 6 +- manifest.sh | 6 +- notify/any.skipped | 1 + .../extra-bisect-params | 0 notify/jira/comments.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 56 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/output-bmk-results.log | 7337 + notify/summary.txt | 1 - results-vs-prev/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 117 + results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 258 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 206 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3437 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 693706 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 705126 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28828 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 74 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 196 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3364 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 721237 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 724329 ++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28630 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 64 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3504 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 258 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 258 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 82 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 258 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4212 +- 57 files changed, 1354021 insertions(+), 1573850 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 09-benchmark/benchmark.log delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv create mode 100644 notify/any.skipped copy {10-check_regression => notify}/extra-bisect-params (100%) create mode 100644 notify/output-bmk-results.log delete mode 100644 notify/summary.txt create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/bmk-specific-variability.csv