This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-Os_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 9b837f78d5b 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 69f12121d87 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 1c14e5ac1a4 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 9078e74f500 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 7556987fed6 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 372d48ecd13 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 208360374df 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a5cbbabfd85 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 3e946acafe8 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 72034b02d0b 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards e97cef6c38a 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 6c17f233ba5 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits discards 2d943d58045 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] discards b90b0c6cec9 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits discards fd28b846132 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/lin [...] discards ca36ead6d92 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 80f02c8cf2a 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-484 [...] discards 92ff7390441 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 691950d4bcd 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 648ab0abbeb 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits discards 8596c875500 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards 22efa52229c 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits discards 1a2bf0ffca0 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] discards 70dc75ab1cf 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c2f2b38f325 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 294e3f316bf 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ca9b0cfeb8a 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7100e38441a 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f104c2f07cd 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c6ca6d09369 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 20a49c108a4 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ab04553237f 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 39a266dc707 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 86302f2c702 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8137bd24af1 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards a0140b57d32 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 352eb5fceb6 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8fa80f59854 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fe6a8985c80 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5a0644b8a8f 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 299affcdf9f 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 558eb17cbf2 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 93953a8872e 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e3d8aee2503 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size b [...] discards 6dc3128cb81 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ff503f2b007 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards cf986433720 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9efc0c56a05 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards c70b40c7de7 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 43b9a2e336a 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 0c141de6eaf 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits discards b693779369b 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% [...] discards 9f00a0cc5ba 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits discards c40fc133ed2 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 11 [...] discards 76f56d0f45b 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 [...] discards 4ee79df1607 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 71066e868df 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 [...] discards 97831bc180f 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards d517db6edb0 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 9e040579719 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-41 [...] discards c2a4ae8d5d5 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 872f25f2f14 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards dbcff3c49bd 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in siz [...] discards 3c0f8b6d762 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in s [...] discards a9cf6ce1d20 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by [...] discards f813477d958 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 6e59b817fcb 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 2f4b17e7535 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 249856f7623 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 3130cb12d3a 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards ef7f5873362 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards bd5a08c7fa1 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 73dd02f003a 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 65d3120ea3e 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 3db084252cc 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 71a4daeac40 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in s [...] discards 54b26f25be8 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 558d3369f2b 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits discards 5d5b9e1eb51 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by [...] discards 3fc4e90f22b 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits discards 4e37ef78410 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-3 [...] discards bfc8f271610 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards d91a3d8618d 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards d3164018c0e 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards d23002008d6 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits discards ec21ebf5048 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] discards 7a11404392e 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits discards 3109f0eb74d 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-3 [...] discards a5cb0ad62c7 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits discards 340df63af45 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 73ef5b5060a 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-3 [...] discards 37bbb69f50e 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 [...] discards d5b0e28a1c6 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gl [...] discards 186ad601cf4 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/li [...] discards 416f879da74 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/li [...] discards 81bd06bc555 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards ce6e182f6de 9: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] discards 3f575e60f84 8: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards 9c83929f928 7: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards 530d02097eb 6: update: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards 45ad2af1294 5: reset: gcc-e5a9d60317852a7323e46109fa366e630b8b5bae: 1 new 452b28916ae 5: reset: gcc-e5a9d60317852a7323e46109fa366e630b8b5bae: 1 new 5189694be08 6: update: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 1839acf83a0 7: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 4aa772bdf84 8: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 0e76060a4b9 9: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] new a8096636e09 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new dfa4d7e24b2 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/li [...] new 1d428743409 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/li [...] new 67625e29936 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gl [...] new 9a2b3603cca 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 [...] new 1de9498d0a6 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-3 [...] new 0a0b8acb493 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 135dad8bca3 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits new ddbcffe2270 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-3 [...] new fc864ebeea7 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits new cae81a7739c 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] new 0157a8cb71f 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits new c04844e6e6c 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 5951a192483 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 3be06cfc63d 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new bd3b4ecbcd5 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-3 [...] new da156dcd288 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits new 4cd1bfdaa3e 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by [...] new 1c680236d87 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits new 018d9d8ce01 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new d7d8aa672c2 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in s [...] new f926b7537d0 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 665a813229f 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 3285a87181c 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 9b67afd738e 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new e8a9ccd9a7f 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new b481b999896 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new c5830288be2 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 4753f3078d3 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new e29fb410987 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new f1cf37d4b15 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 10287768387 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by [...] new 1340510f0a5 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in s [...] new 844711bdea3 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in siz [...] new 3cb80099240 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 9a82b76d831 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 157bd12b4e4 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-41 [...] new 84bd64ccbe8 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new b1ba2575687 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 6ab1ce63d52 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 [...] new 49824e6948e 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 2d4b31e242e 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 [...] new 05031dd740e 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 11 [...] new 37129b7a96e 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits new 9e51d4bbe75 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% [...] new 17891dd04fb 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits new 3839525cd7a 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 528cd7ca9be 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 16263156eef 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new a72a6344c74 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 024a43d5199 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e3f2a9e9379 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5428c591136 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size b [...] new 3055f664463 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6e3fc29d400 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1ffd2881dca 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a8f468b58b7 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 72290588bcc 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 862bd37238d 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1a587bffa03 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2ac80bc4211 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new cd7326097ba 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new cefc763ef7f 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3f571cd9b1e 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new fb89aab88fc 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new bfb59147a55 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c27d39a23b6 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new af69d065795 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 17946cc35d4 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0f052e602fe 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d32783a6fa6 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 86833c3ac1c 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d784ebe2a60 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b9a1d0abad5 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] new 021c765dfc8 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits new b2b21e46210 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new b5e09195ad8 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits new b3e0eb5a482 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ebbf5a76f11 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new ef082658b96 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-484 [...] new 2a50f8161d8 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 2e673759fbe 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/lin [...] new d3bb36bf721 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits new 0ba60204d8a 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] new 476df90684c 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits new 9424d4fbe4e 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new a4eb774a3fb 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 6b099e3626c 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new b0e00ca0de7 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8a29673007f 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 07514d5ca10 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new e5dec6a638d 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new cdad0d59972 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new dd6a15f0aec 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 0338d034578 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new f86a95ec47a 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 786fc8e7a0b 106: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (9b837f78d5b) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gn [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2100 -> 2232 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2460 -> 2424 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27900 -> 28512 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 71348 -> 72496 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 332 -> 332 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8364 -> 7624 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 241800 -> 243364 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 177096 -> 176940 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 109 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 107 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4004 -> 4060 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 48 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 9392 -> 8956 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.improvement | 1 - 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 4 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 77 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/notify.sh | 3 - mail/exe.improvement | 1 - manifest.sh | 28 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 63 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 16 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 376078 +++---- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 444706 ++++----- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 16 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 16 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 42 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 140 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 928537 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 931304 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 42 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 36 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 2 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 69 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 172 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 74 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 74 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 2291 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 75 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 6 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 142 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 928299 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 930991 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 36 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 140 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 928537 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 931304 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 36 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 2 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 71 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 172 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 76 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 76 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 2822 +- results_id | 2 +- 65 files changed, 3203568 insertions(+), 3203456 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff delete mode 100755 jenkins/notify.sh delete mode 100644 mail/exe.improvement