This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.
discards 2729dd7e4 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 64af5e3fe onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3e96fbb07 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f7cb7206e onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 01bf28417 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0c84b6edc onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3e275cc90 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0d14a0349 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5857374cb 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 0e699881f 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b25625513 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c46968257 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 1ea6d7a41 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards e71560737 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 80336bb04 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 39ba6dfec 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b283793ad 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards cdda5a094 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards c096cf570 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 495856385 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9213e3e35 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 48126f3bf 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 10a45b7c2 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards c49531601 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards c2f31db31 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 21b4d8274 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards c97c40cc9 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards c46ac1d7d 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 4bcaf268a 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 8dd178b9c 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 6af038e08 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 19a740218 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 85524deeb 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards f7c16959d 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards ae6b39e03 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 2ac040a73 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards c21a657fa 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 3d8193a94 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards ef277d9ec 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards ebc7890d3 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 469cca9be 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards dfe551cd0 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7992a1d3c 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 09dba1ad1 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 328ef06c3 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 5fab4a735 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c6b15962a 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 9b1c8be7d 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b1e049a8c 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards b223a8ebf 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 7b548cc3f 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards a0d2348d6 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b674b9191 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards a6ae6b352 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards bb0e94011 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards e2a9a0bdd 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards b9f77d8e3 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 924e1b2ec 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 40aab978a 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 9b906a76b 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 4bed3f8b3 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards eb8d8a2d0 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards c4f5c3ebf 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 3455577b0 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 848c40b7e 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 060974aef 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 4914b6192 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards df167e66a 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards dab0e501d 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 53d102802 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards d237661a7 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards b75b30974 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 08e9007e6 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 1506d160f 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 31cad7fdd 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 24affd1f1 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 077592ade 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards cb69edd92 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 258a7ed51 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards e9d9c203f 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2233e5650 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ca722fe4b 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 451b0b316 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7b3e696ef 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards e2843b42a 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards b23ad1ed1 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 13129604b 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 73e0f3d87 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards c26c7ccf8 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards d74e97f12 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards cef7b5a9d 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards b7cdf5c99 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards dbe3e3b3c 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 265424bf9 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 1e71bfcec 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0cfde18a4 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards aa2a0d3c5 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 80a276537 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards 7c6517014 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 801f8eab5 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fa77029d3 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a85772e15 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 61b8f38e0 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards 679da8603 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards a6f647792 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards ac39f6b3d 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] discards 7e0005d39 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards a83437d11 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 6c8b32446 onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 90d2837b6 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 398e96bd2 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] new 0ddff0655 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4f7ddffd9 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new e9aba9bde 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new 2c47111cd 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3bfe7a2f5 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 95fb17b19 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b044b5e0f 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new f044eafb8 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new b2345ac95 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8b45612cd 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6653801aa 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a78129026 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new ace04ca9a 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 42025600f 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new caf504f93 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new d84c2129a 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 2b00c387d 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 9829a2d3e 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new f3e2f66ab 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 365a821b2 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 7b198b85d 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 82f5fe836 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 34b5c8a33 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9d495ec56 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fdb39cffa 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0235ecb32 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8221b04ea 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new e6ef8d3f3 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f99982be5 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new f2671cafb 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 21722e344 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 60d2a228f 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 24a2a4afd 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 52046928a 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 52ae2bf2a 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 5e35f62ec 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new d10a634ae 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 29008118d 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new d2240c0bb 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 23c6404e6 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 67756cc7f 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new f70e5ed6a 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 027570f56 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 57d9305f2 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 316dee31c 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 0a799d4cc 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new a3633109e 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 3d2ba7b60 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 4d8e5ff68 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 099c2b184 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 8bf560832 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new df7edbe38 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new f0b8b05eb 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 06001db2b 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 9ca669f98 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 731c63835 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new f1b3b1c45 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 092e247ac 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 949bab768 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 3d08f2fa8 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b8ea0c771 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new a8633105c 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 783379ddf 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 965b19774 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new eb6c8adb6 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 138285475 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new e5d4ac1a7 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new ca0173d65 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new ee6057d9f 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 49bdd4406 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 73f3032c3 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new d302dd0ed 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new bc7527dd9 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 6f524dbcd 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 68867d6a7 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 1465278ef 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 0f26d32bc 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new c38d5183e 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new e5fa3e3fc 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 6bb5cf9f7 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 987637d17 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new bce5255dd 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 1d7936b9b 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 0fb564357 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1bc9c231c 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1b7e6ec96 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b821ad19c 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 277dcd9d8 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f7cd09e71 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new da0cd25e4 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 584865dc1 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9812e586a 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 8da9dff98 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new fa116673b 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new c86000fb2 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 82e41897c 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 732d48ca5 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 61b840574 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new eced6e459 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 791a68a2e onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e987a06a0 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d7b7fc541 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ae12ddb2e onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 84b3e681f onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 39694084d onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (2729dd7e4) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 108 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: