This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards c6003e3987 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards bdaf833450 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 1a85bf06de 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 27c6e6f547 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards f33b95d825 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 8db9f982dd 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards fd28027ed7 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 82061ad7d3 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 8b6276b6ad 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 148189c02d 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 340bbcd0d0 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 205cf8962a 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards db0b62169f 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards d3ff577b4d 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 7b532fa201 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards bb6cab4b65 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards 4aba35aa2a 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 9b86499d87 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7443bb9432 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards 0c5fac3b91 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 646e200a2c 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 13bc77927a 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 84b714652c 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3a8c1f3e21 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards adfd33fbcb 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 03a6d0fd89 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 30c08935c9 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 57ce0eaa25 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 671720f5d5 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 522e17247a 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards cfafc64765 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 2a46ec7e3d 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 9c0c95e60d 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards aae116daf3 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards b1b07a5959 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 27c76dcbda 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 14e11fae2b 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c3167cdf17 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards e6a0c5aa96 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards dead0d675e 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 0ff68447e2 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 42f5620f64 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards a08e651f6c 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 4c848704a9 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards c32b56730b 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 94a2f1e264 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards a3c5982f4d 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 472d8163a6 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 03ec3e0466 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards 75fdf03244 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards 8dfdd2e007 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 6bdceb932c 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 5965a43d06 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards 27de8e931b 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards f8fa1abe19 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 754528a816 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards d93050a8bf 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards c81d6ddade 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 216cebc9bd 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 966118cc00 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 90eb9b4a01 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 7c33cb78ee 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards e8bfac7973 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5145d3ad97 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7cdf9d6585 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards aeb4659c34 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards aec993f2b4 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 1a5df4f1ab 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards b7de1ae29b 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards ad1704230e 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards c44b0c48ed 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 7fc76b5ba7 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5a6815f6dc 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards e70a7e740b 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 4c30212093 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards b1cde78cfa 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 356ede975e 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 7ceb98fd9f 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 46444f88dc 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards b86505d6c6 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 8fe29007b5 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 3e15730c5f 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 5001c27ea5 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards cf42c84cd4 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 09603a75d7 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards d905138558 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 7aab5d52f1 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 53a6945df2 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 8873e3c86a 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 08c6105ab6 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 4785445a14 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f328aad078 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 12b1b22de0 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards d83736affe 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 5aa221a4e2 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] discards daa67ada0c 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 685bdfd2f0 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 5ec546838e 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 1045abedeb 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards e648ee445c 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards 79a0967c4e 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new fb006a0098 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new c12d8a901b 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new 2cbdd78658 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new ed5fe30a2c 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 5cfb0634e0 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 05047e1d1a 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new d7a93cbac3 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] new 7d6eba1f6b 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new f35e3d8c39 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 3fbce31ac7 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new c6a26de898 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 59984503bd 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 993b46a0fd 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 2477660782 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 31b14d02d9 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6533975c6d 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 4b2818b07d 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new c1e7caed75 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 020b606740 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new c57c02a42f 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 253d23736b 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new c70c1a8b8b 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new b0ffbc632d 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new a3877b2946 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 7333412ef6 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 0f2e424a57 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 9cdffbf453 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new f0f51dac39 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new d4f428617b 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 9e6b140c11 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 2ca88134d9 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new a39b1bda4f 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 0c048604f8 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 375068919c 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new c3750252f2 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 56b932c6f4 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 176528d636 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 26695e368f 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 21dbe12eda 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b90960d33f 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new ec0abeb7a9 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 7ad815bf1a 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 0e0ad72f61 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 7522e9bb2e 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new 9532c2eab3 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new 3d37b9d90b 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 3d6621ddbd 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 51c5393986 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 5b4750bcd5 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new 8dc5a6aec3 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new cebf33e88c 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 63c9e8c3f8 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new 1db80a7729 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new 0543f80f65 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 279c42cc05 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 400b2f7f06 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new fc86662372 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9f8a75cdbf 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new e890cf1a83 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 10b3f3907a 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new b8e9b6783b 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new c7b365d77a 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 3b1ec4b9ac 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new 72ac8089fe 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 5414f387cb 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f92154f2f8 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 44d1553e27 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new b9403f2594 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new 3e6de12e4f 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 53f41130c8 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new 2f73f0d8b5 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new c6140f4059 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 0582ed683a 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new a7885924b9 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new 9388d2fa50 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 197c316685 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 263283f7f8 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 8e3210de7f 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f3d88bfcc4 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fedee4cd9b 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new aa9670732b 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new 0a09de5ecc 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new f0993b8799 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 81bc3db360 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f79846b889 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new bfa18b64fc 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new 2d5fc5654a 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new d666d021e9 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new 8c4570b2a8 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new c4ac612858 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 95e498c247 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 545c7b9abc 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 71f66773bb 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 48274c03df 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new a8de093b3a 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new bfdb49c64a 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f135969c51 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 30207064d1 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new e14f0ce107 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 4649ec3d19 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 5a0c276cde 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 77c5d31c8d 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (c6003e3987) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2184 -> 2188 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2488 -> 2452 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27344 -> 27164 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 17688 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90340 -> 90992 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 70108 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8392 -> 8452 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233640 -> 233428 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 185636 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 211148 -> 212640 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 179888 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 173 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 171 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4188 -> 4136 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 166 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 18900 -> 18456 bytes .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 4 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 1 - 11-update_baseline/console.log | 68 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 28 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 237 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 32 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 32 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2639 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3362 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 66008 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 693195 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 27608 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 38 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 165 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3248 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3266 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 243 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 13 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2852 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3355 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 45186 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 675993 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 25328 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 38 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2633 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3362 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 66008 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 693195 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 27608 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 38 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 165 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3480 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3836 +- results_id | 2 +- 64 files changed, 1171516 insertions(+), 1183414 deletions(-) create mode 100644 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz create mode 100644 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz create mode 100644 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz create mode 100644 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff