This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2.
discards 585581b4e onsuccess: #105: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 32fdf3cd5 onsuccess: #104: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards f51fc5580 onsuccess: #103: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 6a05b00fb onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards a441fabff onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 33288437d onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards e18ee731c onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c016aab4f onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9bcb83242 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 03df2b006 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f0b22fa30 onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a1c24f202 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b67f415ab onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fa4f9cfc0 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d21dfe21e onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e1c185e6b 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 8d58e6a33 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e3a2a865b 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c3b77eaaa 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 72ecdf76b 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b1af3e596 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 80d564df7 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards a9ab6aed2 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards b98e61121 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ef81d3277 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 85c6371a3 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 142fc17b8 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 3ef46bde9 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 41004e025 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards fca63cebd 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 34d13ecde 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a68737137 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 5b558aca3 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462- [...] discards fef9ee40f 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards c716c80b7 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 commits discards dc1f563e8 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 71fbdb0ae 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e93af9e70 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards d30c3b0e7 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 58 [...] discards 1c3f24263 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 9c78625ef 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] discards 1cbc8c42e 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 15242c614 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 791ce14d2 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards b5ed0f4a4 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 64453e847 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 3b0c71d90 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 4584e18ee 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] discards d0540b450 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards db70629bd 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% a [...] discards ef60b8972 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% af [...] discards bb83b1c64 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% a [...] discards 7d83c4885 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-45596 [...] discards 5a3bf7016 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -21 [...] discards d8ddeb57d 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d0a4d2dfa 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f71a94f9e 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 5370f54e1 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 6e9ac2d4d 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 3655a09ae 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards a0c544343 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step_ [...] discards 62991ad7a 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 1e940ddfc 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 0b5e26ed3 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1ea3b4e4b 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards adb7bb5e0 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] discards 02f444da9 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards aa7766f28 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 commits discards d6769a462 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slowe [...] discards 9156710d7 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards f9fc3d7c0 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards b85bac25e 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpoi [...] discards ebe921b43 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build af [...] discards 84e585df0 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 5daf87d5e 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 33ba9490b 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 64505 [...] discards 59532fabe 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] discards 9c09538a2 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards f794da3cf 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 334f587c2 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after gd [...] discards 99c63e55e 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bin [...] discards cbce4d703 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards a81faf859 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1e8c42f2c 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 0241e3968 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK a [...] discards c53aa09b4 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 97bcd9678 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 3048edf01 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run O [...] discards 5b9e0aa15 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK afte [...] discards 52ee23a94 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards f7e76e4b0 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards c9ce41277 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 03a30b62f 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards 175ce0de7 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 7287e177d 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 87231c837 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 0b825a55c 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 0 [...] discards 52e547b6f 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards 989852fe4 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 2775f4dc9 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 13dadec2c 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards be395014a 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21% [...] discards 0fa02db6a 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards ac17d759b 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 79e4ae270 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 8cedaced9 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0782b9346 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards c7fca59e8 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards c2ca43d12 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 043f57337 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fb1b583aa 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards a435a79ad 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards aad794622 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 0b5cc5ddd 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18% [...] discards 03485dc42 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards b5aeeba1d 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 70bdc99f0 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 8 [...] discards a15c58ae4 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards 4a586ac36 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards 5e55003a5 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards bd10136be 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards cf2b633ba 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] discards d4a299d50 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deliv [...] discards 0c92e4af3 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards ec922eb49 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards e7452659b 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards aac1cb481 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9bfa6c0d4 5: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards adc0fe048 4: force: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new f61327261 force: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ [...] new ead9aad54 5: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0ae579499 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d9682a300 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 826fbcb81 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new a6f59369a 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new f1dc2b806 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deliv [...] new 83effa2a2 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] new c8534e8df 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new ab31bfa80 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 0e1509def 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new 563109533 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new 6b3c38eb3 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 8 [...] new 0bca47525 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new de28d68fc 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 9abc5cb05 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18% [...] new cb73df41d 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new f68c092f7 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new b23fb17c9 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new abdb8a14d 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 60005c4d2 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 2c7ba56d6 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 56b5bc4c9 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new a5856f1cf 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new edec4111e 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new e452eb333 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new e76eb31fd 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new baf8fc4d5 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21% [...] new 1b95e41bb 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 687f5e547 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 98626752b 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 81c325820 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new 5a2e99596 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 0 [...] new eb5d37324 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 266a72634 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 704fc975c 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new f9a8ab756 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new aa26590ea 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 7587c8dee 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new e2d363cf0 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new 9854f13b4 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK afte [...] new a565a6795 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run O [...] new 7fdbc9d07 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 51c7d3716 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 10a14664e 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK a [...] new 09d6c08d6 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 9b4067066 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9afc89d27 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new eb7d0c941 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bin [...] new eff8e644a 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after gd [...] new efba03f71 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 6e51ed694 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new e925a6d13 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] new 5427ee558 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 64505 [...] new 603c7e847 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 582aaf499 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 5b5014671 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build af [...] new 4bceb41b6 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpoi [...] new 100dd7bfc 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new e8e192026 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 14e43079d 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slowe [...] new 4a1263fb1 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 commits new 88447bd41 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 470adb4c8 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] new bc1f52e74 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 019d42551 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d0417e599 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new e9193193e 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new bf43a7e75 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step_ [...] new 8a50a2332 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 15ee18165 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 50f8c8360 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new 4302c6314 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 11a2869e1 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c85ef39ae 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e60a6ec93 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -21 [...] new eae1438c3 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-45596 [...] new 71503519b 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% a [...] new be224d8c2 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% af [...] new f306452a4 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% a [...] new 342dc3697 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new ef4046c0b 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] new 34e5a6c3e 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new 66390d6e0 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 8485d67e6 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new a73b5c9d0 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 2b15fdacc 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 802598a37 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d93330fb6 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] new 111e163fe 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new 928ee0717 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 58 [...] new 6a057707f 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 800f07095 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c4758725f 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 6fd94c8ea 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 commits new 7b2732d9f 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new f42ad67cc 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462- [...] new 3cf035ff1 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new bf16c26fa 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 31d22a78d 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 150a2671c 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 54117cc47 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 77dc6a85f 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 651341dda 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 170ca6b65 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 57fb07a41 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3a390bfc5 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new e4ac49cbe 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 9a1e90ce3 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new a8b9dd053 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 99b86f920 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 58cd7f768 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new bb4ebb505 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2f234d9e5 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e245fe7f2 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 52026381c onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 204f50841 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 52ba29596 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1d1f7c8fc onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b4198e0f9 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 202b1c745 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a53d596c2 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c26c2ac24 onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 52bd35665 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new a96833a24 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c8d499545 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 935f2e271 onsuccess: #103: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new cb02ec72b onsuccess: #104: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c434a3a02 onsuccess: #105: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (585581b4e) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 129 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: