This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards b048c40801 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c38c02d146 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards b694d6403a 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 67b708f54b 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 02eeb86650 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 9dea208a69 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1c089c738d 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 58226c2681 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 0f5140b1fd 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards cbfd88d24b 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c6566f32b0 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 168e5b86cc 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 9ab98bd42d 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d31319e090 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 32906d572a 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 50727d1623 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a43a6246b7 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 4c5456b52b 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: n [...] discards 06c4584e1e 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 9889d4371c 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 69980258dd 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 444fb7517e 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] discards 7b3758f302 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] discards 0150ecacb3 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards f93c3749f9 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 8b7e021c05 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% a [...] discards ae6ca3a5bf 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 44668fbe2a 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 08ae9471ab 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 [...] discards f1b498e031 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 48d12fc42b 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% af [...] discards 6bf0cf12d0 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 52a8d8d8e6 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 82cca3b833 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 388f876d14 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f6b5a28145 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2c38fedfca 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards ca8e34411d 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 40a26ed2ce 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 6aee404f9b 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ffbae091d9 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 066daedce2 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards e8261fad4d 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK afte [...] discards 1c0eb7b3e2 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards c296b5dc23 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 4f22a24d92 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 062e3ea800 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 6027af53ce 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 543d0fc826 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 35a9c513b5 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards a654e67065 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards 9d3fdbfba2 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 24e2e49496 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 86ee58b138 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 2a98fe26dd 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 1f10d10a96 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gd [...] discards 972cc30652 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards c8ecdba246 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 3187049eda 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards 1358f2cf90 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] discards cd92e06f7e 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] discards 116bbe1a64 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards b7b1a7e4ea 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 8c8bcdc72f 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 [...] discards d5e8329242 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards d3959855b7 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 17bb9fe92f 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-41 [...] discards 620f73f93b 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards efd37a377e 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards a07beebc63 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 1eed2bc2c8 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 0869ae5dd3 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f5015c2886 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards feca64fb9e 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2a0e3e4489 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1f0a1ad18b 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards cb754bef8b 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1454e3be2d 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards bb7faf89f5 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] discards e10793bcbf 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards a0e6b5a30e 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 428020fe6f 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards f3dfd4ade6 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 132ce4588d 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards a3038144d3 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2edb4c6559 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 054150a6ea 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-416 [...] discards 81fe633047 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards bbdd319fc7 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9a2ebefd6d 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d8aa3e3aa6 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2835b4a5c9 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6 [...] discards 2ab70cff24 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 63ee9c5382 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 250a1cc882 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards a9e4f8f9e6 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2f3ce791eb 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards 314734489e 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards ce0dc93a2d 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6c25703cf7 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] new 7fb2a2be19 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] new f45bcdbe2b 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bbb61dbe92 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new e8bcecf8cd 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new 4228a27635 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c1de7efce1 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0ea8a1b1d0 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c80b5e9756 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new b44b5bfbdc 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6 [...] new f1f1c0418e 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new cc8903491a 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3d1e121afe 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 232efddf0e 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new fa079288d5 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-416 [...] new f311357ce7 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new c97f95815d 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new e8cd6eb4af 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 5ad3ed8bed 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 44cf4be539 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 25b2797142 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new c7bf76e226 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 9c56737717 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] new b1c6a7dd53 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 415d9ab708 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f585b8464e 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new e00861c1c6 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2b5d8d6e3a 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new a9152ca68c 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c641ea4b89 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 40c437004f 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 2508c6a382 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 4addbeedac 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new f66dcfd64b 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new ebf9cea4f1 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-41 [...] new 5c9c5a615c 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 78d864ba80 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new bc1af6b6e5 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 [...] new 15eae60577 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 43593f4163 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 821de41811 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] new c286745dc5 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] new 570cb010e3 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new e80c0ff523 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 102b711d2f 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 09232240a2 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gd [...] new 1cb50444af 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 10472dc348 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 3378e49870 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 696c23ed09 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 3e7fcf7738 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new ebca8ff511 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 7ee2768c3c 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 601af44d89 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 8c4659fa18 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 0fc936a6c5 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new d9f9f79bdb 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 8c8154e670 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e2f90f30bc 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK afte [...] new 6f54a729a6 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 0c4ce76a0d 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 47f1355845 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 37890f05cb 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new bdd8db6948 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new c69eec9415 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 00911f58c0 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2a83159494 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b499d063dc 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new c43c1b4c01 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new a5d4cdc045 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 61baf20401 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% af [...] new d8b68e93ca 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new d9275db93f 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 [...] new d3e73273a4 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 6a003b02bc 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 093e4e09a7 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% a [...] new 6d9857b5b1 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 1636795c33 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 22a9ec40d8 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] new 67cfaa8547 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] new a67ae48aaf 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new c6beb977ac 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 2a2a80149c 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 743692302a 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: n [...] new ff8c8d0331 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new aa22a9a799 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6fd307606b 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 06b99ccb5d 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 6369e65b4f 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 56b5a0a629 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 48b15f168b 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6dab815e08 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a49031116c 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new d653a88b14 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 424d91635d 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 24597b6e50 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 987f227064 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 118135488c 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 0af1de7eee 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 7cc7864255 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new fbe79fc96a onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new ba22282762 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (b048c40801) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2380 -> 2384 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2656 -> 2688 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27452 -> 28068 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17800 -> 17948 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90656 -> 91480 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 69940 -> 70624 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7820 -> 7816 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234928 -> 235644 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185904 -> 186268 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 212940 -> 213276 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 179148 -> 178664 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 152 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 150 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4220 -> 4172 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 6404 -> 3208 bytes .../output-bmk-results/diff-bmk-results.out | 0 git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- manifest.sh | 32 +- results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff | 8 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 90 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 36 - results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 30 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 192 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 26756 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 369436 ++++++----- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 18536 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 590 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 32 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 194 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 42931 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 582532 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 19870 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 800 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 70 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 214 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 82 +- .../csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff | 0 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 82 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 40 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 82 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3956 +- results_id | 2 +- 46 files changed, 539192 insertions(+), 527713 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/diff-bmk-results.out delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff