This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.
discards 156df56b0 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards f2a90d28d onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 7c7c4aeaf onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards f70df45dd onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5c50caa0f onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2bbe6795c onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 61ac45d51 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cd8a3eadb onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 21408b1d8 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9e1d2b96d onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 060451b07 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f3a0097ea 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ea18a6d86 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 57e34e26d 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e80d1c870 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards d28094563 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b258570b7 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b019a507a 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 217bae06f 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b09e09cf1 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 4bfddb331 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2dc3d72bb 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e02f31af9 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 0e133ac97 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards aa1462dbf 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards c591e399d 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 09bf12be8 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards cfe1c9dce 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 11051d410 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards f4d098cb3 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards fb31f5b80 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 72142f913 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 4f1927a99 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 03d1994aa 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 9daa5af2e 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards dc9feb243 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 213f7dd12 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 33105ffb6 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 3e79c1247 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 94352356c 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards a4967f590 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 1434304f4 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards a22342635 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 15c135d0a 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d123f8ebb 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards cd9b8e37e 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 431644813 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 8992760e1 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards ba1831638 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 5d759bc57 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 3eac030ff 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 0ac072cbf 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 60d9128d9 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards c35bc34e1 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards cdc182030 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards e4098ca26 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 0dab8e2a8 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards e72b1f669 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 88564ee5b 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards e6e9e987f 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards e96073feb 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards c57f3c9db 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards aa0a18e5b 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards c7d94b64c 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 3ae11afdc 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards d863f3d07 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards cc74a0db9 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 8ac3355ce 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards a3b00b1fc 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 757e87aa2 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 76362d01c 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 6aad35923 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 4b2266a28 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards a2cfc528e 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards fcd76b161 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards ce1d7ef47 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 1145c96d5 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards dc665041a 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 445dc11f6 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards a07470935 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards cd020a862 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 712b03f01 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a0904c34b 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1bbe8f01e 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ab5206215 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0ad520714 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards b9fda40f6 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards aefa5533d 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards c2ae96794 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 2d6b484cf 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards b4057dee5 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 0eb0eb542 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 09fee16d3 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 15c4bd1c0 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards ea2fe246e 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards d23ed10de 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards bfec643d8 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9de76f637 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1ac3a34f3 onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 44f9ad986 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new afac68777 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 6077976f9 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new ac98c90e8 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 2707cabee 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new f0a68f685 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new b5c960d0d 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 99e050a11 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 8ad11bbdc 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 01381be7e 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 10df688a8 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 7a3a93189 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new eb3414a66 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 212fcccf2 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 765490857 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ef8f6d482 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4350ada68 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new a0a6b2443 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 513bb468d 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new c708d88f9 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new d3c508f6c 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new ace34134e 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new ef5da6dc6 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new d8c813122 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new c969a6a9a 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 91aecff3d 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new e011c85d7 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 99873d6b5 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new def58d41f 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 3e223d6d2 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 93e5dad2c 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new c46c9cf83 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new f5ce3b3ab 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new d7546cbcb 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new cbca3cb5a 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 884514e7d 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new a029b0f0c 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 31316fa41 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 50cb0b0a9 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 36dba29b5 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new c6622beea 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 7d44ad237 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 0ae5c0759 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new f46968471 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new bd003292b 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 01fac53f1 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b732cd9c1 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 79c13172c 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b098b26ef 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 8249315f7 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9ad456e9d 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 12244de83 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 6309791c4 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 3d4eea545 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 41374e13f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 15a4f1319 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 4378bbe4b 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 19c905179 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 505ed7a20 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new fc1cb2f61 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new e57582446 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 0b7e55b52 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 2b8bd060f 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new bebc2a94d 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 7d2fd40f0 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 9089ec38b 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new e0dd89821 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new b0c978e4f 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new fb1bd29d1 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new d86af6dbc 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 1acbc2564 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new bc14f7fb3 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new dfb9d2495 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new efbeb419b 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9ef06f327 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 33fb31d4a 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new bcdaf47d2 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 58b58d1de 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b80278711 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b568081f7 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c7fbaf9a7 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2127b4dd5 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 731155d84 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 68e05e27f 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2c53e9f83 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 4b9002d7e 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1091b8679 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a12204306 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 17d056161 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6eaa17e72 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 087b2c111 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2d9aa837c onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new fd3f5ee7e onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b4eee2cbd onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3d7b4f51e onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 0e7d78c4b onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new d72443019 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (156df56b0) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 98 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: