[Tcwg-commits] [toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (77240d25 -> 1a3a6d2c)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards 77240d25 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 780e5ef6 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards b9dda536 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards cefd9aa6 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e8238697 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cbda4edb onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c637a836 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6fc67df4 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c9b1c628 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 01d93acd onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 714aec7d 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 746bff83 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 9a7adc61 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 45d5faa7 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ee77a2a4 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards df7c2fc7 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 35cae6b7 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 122cb756 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 306a4a02 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b7038e0e 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 1148383b 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3f84ef5d 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3e91ce24 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 44747065 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f01975ea 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards f15cdcbd 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 175ad9d9 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 81d90343 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards a3861d8b 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 8432fd7a 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 10791bb4 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards f3f5055a 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards f5ed700a 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards b2b60d3d 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards a1bfdb57 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 7642db18 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 820e0218 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards df9b2755 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards da36bb26 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 674b4d87 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 48a2f022 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 94681653 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 6ec797d2 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 459bb67e 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5c4b32d0 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 96ac009c 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards cc44aac4 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 49ec6081 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards cfa8a0e5 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 827d425a 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 6f63c4d3 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 1f12f98c 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards e2cf2026 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards d7e79f0c 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 86ae9656 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 16900903 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 065cad34 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards b20b9495 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards fb661df1 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards f3e65a54 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 7c0d5d44 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards d5deef77 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 8199ad38 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards c7f03c4c 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 1728445d 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards a219c2d3 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 7d2d4ac9 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 4caaa3c0 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 1ada8f83 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 8e3d4a7a 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards e15ac06e 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 697fe537 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards d59e3f46 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 9dced195 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 10ef6d73 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 7b1aaa37 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 5950a9fa 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 60c2c96e 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards dd766c05 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards fc4a4536 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8f57aa4c 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 69ce3c8d 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ee7b1199 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6d5036fe 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards bb9d78b9 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 84d7430b 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 2a2b2032 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 7daa72a2 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 0222b08f 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 0bfd2772 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards 7a1bf02e 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 8489ba37 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 54e5dca7 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 7f03bd73 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 228c967b 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards abf12af3 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 90ea1155 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b27f9064 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 39d277f9 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 46910f82 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards 1b3157d8 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 0a86c714 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fc05f224 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c996c5d6 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5dc091ae 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards f49e78da 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d7ada8bb 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 17497c12 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] new 08f1658d onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new e0e906bf 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 499687c1 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 4ed6f6ec 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new ce1c465a 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9c45cb7c 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 73e70384 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6e721370 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new a2be1b6a 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 7b7bdc00 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 733c3513 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 18ffd2af 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 207a8f37 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 893d45c5 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new c2cb69be 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 710d190c 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 90d7cdbf 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 94dac05f 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 94d4eafc 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 756bc915 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 5470421e 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new a2537368 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 28502cb9 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new b1537622 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8cca374f 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 488cfca1 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8e460330 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7b29a4ab 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 0bfbf1e7 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 24840ae7 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new dfbe04dc 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new c0f6f8fa 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 0edd90ff 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new f1924986 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new a371dcdb 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new f1679295 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 42454134 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 53aaadff 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new b11d31cb 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 6336ed50 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new f2e4a3d4 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new c4260c74 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new ba2ba44d 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 63833fd9 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 66753469 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new f5d1f8d2 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 82cb31fc 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new c6452806 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 2edf8fa9 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 86d019bc 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new c2b770e0 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new b79cc04c 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 8c07b141 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 321b5501 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 9a102d42 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 167457b6 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new a5143175 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 6723d4a7 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 31bae798 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new c2e9957b 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 4944a2f8 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new cc214392 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 991a75e7 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 2d2d3a68 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new f67894b5 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 99ffbb16 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 439f4ec3 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 1bba0252 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 24239759 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new d58e1d5d 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 327a5e14 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 572e78d2 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new ce6b7075 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 48ecb088 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 2122457c 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new eb2a1fae 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new db7d3358 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new c2e4e97d 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new acfca0d8 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 4f7149b4 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 2b0b8241 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 54567bc2 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 41225833 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 29072d93 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 2c399b04 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5dc9a894 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new cce02ab0 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7355ceee 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5af8d589 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 93a586da 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a2224a9f 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c5e30481 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c49e0ebd 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new c62369e5 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 794c31ca 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 75422a71 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e267bbf5 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 9dcdc5fc 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 680a6c83 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 84b3f9b1 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0a83556b onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new fdd84c25 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e93e4626 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 883223d8 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ce0e5294 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 442c5e9a onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 1fcda641 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 1a3a6d2c onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (77240d25) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 108 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: