This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards e672bbf3823 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards cd015eb5eb7 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 757e7d95e17 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 0c9c4f75bfa 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 5fc03166ce5 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 8ea5f0cb0e2 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 6e9e045f660 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 4820c2f3a69 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gc [...] discards 88728535221 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-4846 [...] discards 6a2a30abfd2 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 467ca5468c0 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 23 [...] discards d6eba919d22 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards b19ac10a970 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 6eae1d1f699 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards 460ea281249 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 9c8648f1d30 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards b3451e82082 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] discards acf9c1dfb09 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 86703b83cc9 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 3f0ecd53b66 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] discards cb0cee0fb37 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards ebceac3c9d4 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 5e6c9eb9b94 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards b3a83bf8a17 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ae40bf44132 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards cbc88692513 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 8d01876a2eb 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% [...] discards 757eeae71df 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 1e6331cc346 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-455 [...] discards faac5c51c40 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards fa7d8aa0b9b 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards a8cabd38e38 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2f0e1bce686 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 46af8160a29 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 [...] discards 36ec69efb81 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 9b031a1257c 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 1f32e313960 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_ste [...] discards da2b03d34e1 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] discards bee1679bdcc 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 6cb903d59a2 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e44afd21db3 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards f659bffd918 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards a141d6c68b4 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards d528ab3a486 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 4cbb69c7b59 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slo [...] discards 549b50e94e1 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 0f99fa991c3 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards fb80110015d 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchp [...] discards 632b2b7bda7 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 5634b774cb2 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 70a98e1a9fe 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards aecdc923c36 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 645 [...] discards 36a70e2fac6 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK [...] discards 3a803d7be83 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 1c6f6722029 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards bdb0633197d 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] discards 07058c49630 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 775d57ce856 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fa9d55f5506 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 6fd5c73a2e2 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards a2c3eeef668 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards ec4c096acd3 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards 718ff0e62ec 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 61efa8913b4 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards a1d9641ed19 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] discards 129164e502d 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 85c594c0498 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d87ee02da5f 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] discards b5320d92d5a 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 25c137269b1 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards eef2fda060b 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] discards 51705f16d4b 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 01054a59058 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards f5463477c73 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and ru [...] discards bd33ca4ba48 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build [...] discards 28ac31acb5f 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards fb8b6ae099f 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] discards a18eb29db78 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 2 [...] discards 7d5c995919b 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 5db36dc7575 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 3 [...] discards cedfd8bfd22 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards d042a6039f1 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards a294aacf5d0 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards a3042961090 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 645f92784ef 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 244c8eca53e 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards eec2eedce91 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards f21c1b06d69 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 4b4921cefdd 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] discards 5a0f7a0350e 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 1 [...] discards 2c9d72050bc 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards ec6645d792c 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 [...] discards 41941a1010a 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 095635db95e 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 [...] discards f79df60dd5d 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards 1d9476e2c68 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 7c4d31a0c2f 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 9c525119987 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline [...] discards 978ac1ad8bf 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7del [...] discards f8c07d53ad1 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] discards b38f2d0bb39 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 29d449d8b5a 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 790db042824 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] new 3abe6a93d1f 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7del [...] new 88157cab922 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline [...] new c8260327e71 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new b9835649918 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 20a2ec7f31e 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new 884f3a018c5 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 [...] new 9251fce21b8 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new bbb85edc82d 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 [...] new 24025a084cf 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 84003d4e68d 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 1 [...] new 9d862fbb605 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] new d3f4cb3697a 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 2fadfc287e0 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 2ad58d0e713 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 933774f3f43 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 1d64db68281 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new cd7191467f7 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 6770bad1177 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 28513f349a8 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 4d8987a2d6f 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 3 [...] new 1073bd9d436 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new b795d2854e2 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 2 [...] new 476650a58eb 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] new 8f3b4c40724 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 367f26c8cab 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build [...] new 8c2b74bc5cc 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and ru [...] new 1eba3b0a65a 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 763f71002c6 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new ba0847758cd 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] new bf0d185100f 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 098f4a63830 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 47967f74827 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] new 691ffc7ed42 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 83dc7128acf 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new b5ec70ba2ea 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] new 731611d109b 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 2a5ef5160ea 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 88a14052e3d 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new 3a3cfe47900 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new c99531c6d1a 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 4c9dd8e08d6 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c1418756ff9 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 18afe2cd18c 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new 55041b81f20 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] new 2f2dabc15a3 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new f510c6e317b 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 37128d2034a 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK [...] new 114317e91c0 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 645 [...] new af9a4023c46 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 64e9d1aab12 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 56fd2271b7c 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new a6f09e704a9 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchp [...] new f0eef50223d 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new b960bd48ae3 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 77ce5edef2a 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slo [...] new b8c5bc16a42 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 931b2590b5f 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new efe50566df2 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 472f81385c9 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new a72046cd982 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 94f9da677f8 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new abbe2358b7f 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] new 207fbcc9a35 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_ste [...] new 8e76f1b8e5e 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new a1453227a9d 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 1176c64de8e 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 [...] new d1a98ea07bf 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 73e0eeee01a 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new da700450da3 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f48fc89e035 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new e271d67c02c 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-455 [...] new 2b256f8f584 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new f6bddf0f74f 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% [...] new 801d4426f62 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new aee2e0b890e 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new ed80f5a2076 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 15995c7eab4 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 939f142de0b 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new d297a637222 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 077a71848dd 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] new 8cdc2ded4d0 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 23b193a0ce0 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 893302a6cfb 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] new 7a66e807c3f 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new e5a38da8d05 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 88549d0f64c 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new c7334538132 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2be6d665691 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 748c63150d8 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 23 [...] new 0adea35d339 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new b4e9145903d 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-4846 [...] new 2222f979973 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gc [...] new c63c9ee5735 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 333702127de 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 4c70046aced 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 49053b252ad 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 7565329a302 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 9eaec32a89d 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 662241cb8a1 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 63d3be2a13e 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (e672bbf3823) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2012 -> 2224 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2492 -> 2456 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27888 -> 27640 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90424 -> 91676 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8488 -> 7656 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233456 -> 233936 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 212724 -> 211836 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 188 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 186 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4200 -> 4124 bytes 10-check_regression/471.omnetpp.symbols-skipped | 1 - 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 178 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 19352 -> 17680 bytes 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 8 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 5 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 59 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 29 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 237 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2844 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 721290 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 714914 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28122 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 64 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2400 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3331 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 753031 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 756074 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28702 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 50 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 115 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3185 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3432 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 242 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 12 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3006 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3391 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 750809 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 753816 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28928 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 69 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2398 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3331 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 753031 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 756074 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28702 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 50 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 115 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3477 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4006 +- results_id | 2 +- 65 files changed, 3072085 insertions(+), 3038977 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/471.omnetpp.symbols-skipped delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff