This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.
discards 11fceb46 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards de3d0990 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 28b10c3b onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards dcad3538 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cf5eec60 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards db33bb8f onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 722873b1 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 928a47d1 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 36785491 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 47877921 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 99d0527b 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b26194c1 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 29e70fe7 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 80b21e55 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 2754778d 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6df36c13 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 593967d1 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b4a20fcf 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3eac1509 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 685d4212 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8f1a928c 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6f8cf020 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d50a0210 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards cc421fa0 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards a6853ea8 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards f698f0c1 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards e3facb9d 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 39af09b7 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 06f195bc 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 00417477 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 62f7788d 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards e5e31211 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 29555a58 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards ce01daf6 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards c6abd7a7 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 9ca0cdc2 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 89fa04d8 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards b5b30223 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards d53afe32 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards c7a23b3e 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 09555b8d 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 78034b90 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4e486b6f 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards f4cfca2d 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards b2252c0c 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards bbf63e90 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2f3b81cb 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 75d7fb2b 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards bdfb6b70 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 622bef29 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 31095dbd 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards aedf61d0 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b4b7da5f 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 053f7d63 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ddd09606 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 3a26ef3c 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 877e37bc 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 5dc77920 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 6febda01 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards cf2b5742 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b425e961 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 52efd88e 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 8d773d89 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 399bc00b 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 30af28eb 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards ed17333e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 83c129bf 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 6eee2224 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards f44b75e0 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 099544a4 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards d9ff6861 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 81e99935 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards dfba0363 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 35624058 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 0c166a70 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards b2b4be98 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 891013ac 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards a2f0d885 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 83f64608 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 6c04ea0e 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 71b1fa54 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e9882dbb 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4703f067 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards accc08fd 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards d655eb8b 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards f6d8fc1d 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards fbbe1182 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards ebf651d6 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards 855745eb 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards e50cfc4b 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards d6606863 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards dcb73763 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards e10f8d7a 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 99cc4dcd 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 6c8af3dc 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d66dba71 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d33a7adf 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9a25538f 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards 3638888a 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 2aa0a413 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 53f7b220 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0a1aa239 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f7c4a454 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards 7bf02121 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 2380b1bd 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a73fa17d 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] discards 1ccb7df3 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards c7976089 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards a3c1e163 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards e77aaa39 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards e096d575 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: 8 [...] discards 560b70c8 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards 406dd14d Initial empty repository new e0040f8c init: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_c [...] new 73d8a091 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: 8 [...] new 30c95855 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 65dd81b9 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new d4221b3a 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new b9ab8e5a 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new b0b6cc25 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] new 1e4713a4 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a7d526c0 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new cf56c0e5 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new 5db6ffae 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 68413c40 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e46aa7a1 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 323265a8 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 0a5f9f51 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 2a30e83a 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 959a7e79 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5d76d220 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 55db7152 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 4fb34629 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 712facf5 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 11e28341 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 679aeb09 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new f6e8796f 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 9c4cb36b 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new f0e2847f 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 1802d7ce 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 4859937c 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 7410d8eb 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 174728b7 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 41041965 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1894f08d 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ab03c2e7 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new cb407c00 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 6936d422 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 789406dd 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new ac904ea9 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 7f55b697 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 3c7e4841 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 379beaf0 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new ffff4d5f 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 6209a3f6 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new c70fbe32 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new fb7a7532 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 1cf2e573 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new f112938a 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 34f6ecd6 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 3df97c38 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 3db85077 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new dedda822 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new f51314a1 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 4ea60895 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 902d50ed 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new f21b1cf2 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new fb815bea 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 84f1383c 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new a2ffb285 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 2d014b19 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 25351a54 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new ff29b94b 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new ff27ff44 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 15a84aa5 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new fc76bf3b 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 255780bb 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 9b65f50c 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 48128d30 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 6a52d9d7 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b79b9fb6 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 52f9b075 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 823e1cd0 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 76a855a4 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 72292a2a 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 179f932f 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 344a237f 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 03dacd18 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 531514e0 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new a676209b 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 6e9a310f 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 9cb42033 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new d44b9fc2 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 015fb510 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 5abdab9c 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 4b13713c 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new e348c91a 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 9fe370fa 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new d6972eb7 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new e4cbe4da 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new e2e31ec3 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 88afa3c5 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new c2fb9840 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 3d1d0153 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d1b96e45 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 558cc5d8 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 753951fe 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5f21223e 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 44108946 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6a102e2c 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 34867ed0 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new de47e4e4 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new d5414594 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new d191a93d 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3761c5a7 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ca1722e4 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new b1f04479 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 851b5db7 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8a90ae3b onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4c45a1fe onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a2315408 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f29e848e onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 422f0cf1 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new fb583067 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a4389dac onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (11fceb46) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 112 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: