This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards a875e50a002 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards d3bb62ba9d3 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 8976ffcb40e 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 789a3c2fa04 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 17ba39261c4 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards a0f113167d3 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 323accf5aed 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 7bb9f8ee2e7 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 83d8dd7cc73 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 03374f93e13 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2a5211083ce 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 876b8198e8f 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards b7345ebb188 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] discards 896cadb81b3 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7c209714eae 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 545f999c4af 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 4b7476dfc6e 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ae664ed3290 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 4d9cdf86165 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7aa7b585f72 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards 8134274c18e 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16 [...] discards ef40a7cb8a2 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards b55e671ab18 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] discards 2ebf61fe14f 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 85d052f6400 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 169 [...] discards f04b0fa76a7 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 7eb3f8a27db 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards cdddc9a3b04 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19 [...] discards b94631a0d8a 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 099d4c0daeb 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11 [...] discards 431f76f4dcf 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards fd80960f818 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 3d203c18dee 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 0cc798ea35f 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards 0a280017746 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 7fc595aee7c 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 2194b92ff9b 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards fd1df470ee9 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] discards 6bb862f1c22 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 523f44c5099 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 560ace37798 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8541ec272bf 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 359ee1ba4c3 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 2c166d170b3 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards e5024e99347 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards cafefb92d2e 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 8ce3bc83556 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 82fa2f1e41d 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] discards 8dd421cb9d8 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 164d0144414 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 705e36c16dd 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.900 [...] discards d9cc84e0f0a 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards bac81b78bf2 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 2e797ec17d3 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards d99fc943fd6 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 859192ace23 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 3b9b4f1cdff 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 7ae2650f52a 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 83f027e2af2 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards a270d5eee6a 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] discards 388d63e1a1d 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7729ff2e3ea 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards d29ba846781 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 9fc16b71c1a 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.3 [...] discards 8075d8f1565 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK [...] discards 4b1b4d33c13 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 39d2baf375b 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards bc73d19f84c 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards ae50c7959eb 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check [...] discards ab4c35efdba 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards bbd23597b27 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards ddfc3bed5a4 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 5cdaed0a658 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 3d3ba2515c3 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 46265d60c14 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards b4fa2cfd4ef 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 026b6f1c52c 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 7a06ce95580 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards db732e05872 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards c3803a9855d 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 6d03fe78ca5 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] discards 2373c635176 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards 25cb0e9a0ec 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] discards 6f0faadd4f9 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards 79f65e43a78 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 83f2f1ac5be 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards 482fff3c82e 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards f5ca7fe4fe8 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards d007c1596fe 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 7712f041bf6 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 6c301413eae 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 12 [...] discards 83316bf2174 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 [...] discards d3443898814 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by [...] discards 079ac028146 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 3750db46647 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 80d1dc1cc34 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 6cfc76bac6c 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14 [...] discards ebec506c597 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed d [...] discards f833d1091bc 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% aft [...] discards 3e41adf8720 6: force: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII built and run OK af [...] discards 9ac49ef1bff 5: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp slowed down by 7% [...] new 53649ddf7d6 5: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp slowed down by 7% [...] new 38d056dd4d5 6: force: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII built and run OK af [...] new 68ba25cc153 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% aft [...] new 7162a2ef079 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed d [...] new db950d822a6 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14 [...] new f76b454bd02 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new a641ffdf3dc 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 4077426e578 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 135c513d0fe 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by [...] new 418d82a4412 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 [...] new 93a6ba0b1f1 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 12 [...] new e8a9fe5feab 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new c68e54f4d01 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new fe1dca1afb9 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new 327a205a265 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 7171fbe6564 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new d3ca90d6e6c 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 894ce91ebe6 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new 91451e8f7c3 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] new 14c9deae92b 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new 0038f42c840 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] new 06141f7662e 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 2bef1911469 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 302efe29570 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 5d2ad7adc19 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new d1cca583234 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new 17eed029335 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 483382b26a9 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 70a225006ca 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 7e967b72b3d 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new a2f806ffbb3 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 56697bfb8f2 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 9a14de289fc 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check [...] new 5d83f6adbc7 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 652d50b810a 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new e3abc083dd2 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 15d69b769b2 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK [...] new 354ed39985e 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.3 [...] new 8bf49d4af7b 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new cf95922fa1a 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new 983c796a298 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2aa27a2be1f 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] new a4e6f2d3763 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 61330798ef1 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 522514bb4f5 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new d535e723be8 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 7d74ea4d167 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new aa864653b65 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 0127dcf101c 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new f25961cbfc9 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 90cf6642d77 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.900 [...] new d1892fc636c 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 69282325d50 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new e1c747a6d25 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] new 0ad55b08a17 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new ad8854a21ce 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new 41dd00cd06b 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 80d1a38daaf 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 79790e48514 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 534595c868a 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new cfb2b9fdaf8 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 79b4286d968 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ea5fe27e9c1 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 104a7a15ad2 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] new 66ad4ff9879 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 8cb939479dc 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 82004a3bec3 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new dfbdf06c3b2 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 53ab1cd4ae7 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new f1a6a2c5e3d 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 143bcfc006c 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 71d4e82af8b 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11 [...] new 35361991df3 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 1ef9103b47b 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19 [...] new 433ab097d68 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 73f95f9d8ef 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 402231fc302 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 169 [...] new d98c065ba88 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new daf431944df 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] new 6c6ed4f1ac4 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new 065845f6cbc 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16 [...] new 99a4dac8374 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new 20c9d14bbae 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f5d8b6e6d59 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 93a3af17612 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5dca8525420 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 64ac3d521eb 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new add64d828ac 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f95e8c6c2f9 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] new 4abd19a6f40 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new 728113df8ad 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new b3ef97f0de4 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 1b557a2fcf7 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new dfe6dceeecb 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 208fc379702 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new e9d543250e2 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 7b2a4b1b4a9 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 361e953efba 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 698ecde71f7 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 98d4f1a1da8 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new d033577a0a1 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 6cb5f2d856a 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (a875e50a002) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2192 -> 2184 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2468 -> 2488 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27652 -> 27008 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 89808 -> 90420 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7648 -> 8524 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234436 -> 233128 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 214040 -> 211256 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 141 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 139 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4116 -> 4096 bytes 10-check_regression/437.leslie3d.symbols-skipped | 3 - 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 165 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 14064 -> 17856 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.improvement | 1 - 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/error_code-1 | 0 .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 4 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 2 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 1 + 11-update_baseline/console.log | 75 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/notify.sh | 3 - mail/exe.improvement | 1 - manifest.sh | 18 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 222 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2738 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 760016 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 773036 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30386 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 1042 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2971 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3055 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 772544 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 783484 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 29516 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1134 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 55 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 58 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 2994 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 229 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 229 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3217 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 231 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 15 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2726 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3129 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 733460 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 744876 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 29098 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 1182 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2971 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3055 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 772544 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 783484 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 29516 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1134 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 55 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 58 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3226 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 233 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 233 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3738 +- results_id | 2 +- 66 files changed, 3182945 insertions(+), 3099506 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/437.leslie3d.symbols-skipped delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/error_code-1 delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff delete mode 100755 jenkins/notify.sh delete mode 100644 mail/exe.improvement