This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2.
discards 4590283a onsuccess: #105: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c02e903f onsuccess: #104: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 96e2c557 onsuccess: #103: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 5c79951f onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards e286c4c2 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards ce10cb43 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 6343459b onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2e0c0d94 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0908dcf0 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b14a0b1d onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f9ae6c8e onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3aef9d09 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 672d71cf onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9802a2d3 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e6fa29d4 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c160791d 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f2f8dd8c 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 6a55660c 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a5906b47 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 0d09dbbc 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b26411ba 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 195a7621 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 6bad9a55 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 3de7368f 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 203aea04 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f3b867d5 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 852859e0 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 76fbf06b 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 9d95a1a2 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 47c7234c 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 06038725 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 4355842b 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 0aaae511 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462- [...] discards 6129d6dd 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 0961872b 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 commits discards 36b54663 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 23c5dd7b 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1354f1ec 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards a6b61547 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 58 [...] discards 7d315623 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 09a7dcb3 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] discards b2f55027 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f9cb19d3 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 358ae941 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 2a0119c4 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 39cbb9ba 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 64b2df87 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 9b000377 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] discards de2de46a 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 990443aa 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% a [...] discards c05cb607 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% af [...] discards e9be69fb 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% a [...] discards ef97cf06 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-45596 [...] discards dd90270b 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -21 [...] discards 183bfbb9 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2790eee5 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1ff6d734 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards bca97f18 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 3fc22f9d 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards f162d577 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 56e95359 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step_ [...] discards 3d3006a8 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 8c20f2a6 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards dd02b157 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d1f2b520 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 32f154d9 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] discards 2a789efc 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 16ac75bd 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 commits discards 9e4bb6ac 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slowe [...] discards 9e4e3aa8 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 801f53ea 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards f849d3f7 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpoi [...] discards ce4d9e7e 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build af [...] discards 8b6ff15b 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 31fd12f7 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards bcd9fe42 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 64505 [...] discards b748e2a0 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] discards c9cc81d2 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 7f7d073d 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards dddbe53c 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after gd [...] discards e0929db8 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bin [...] discards 76ed5968 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 9547cd09 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d6f87651 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards ef294a55 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK a [...] discards 863d8a6a 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 981b5bfa 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 007dc02b 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run O [...] discards 981a8134 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK afte [...] discards af455e44 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards a3822b2d 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 245209cc 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards cfd75122 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards c01d0ebd 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards c04659be 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards cb7447c0 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards b228db13 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 0 [...] discards b48299d9 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards c550a7cc 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 1e039d1f 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 7d06fb29 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 5e683847 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21% [...] discards 0679bc27 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 8009f5fc 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 43ca39b6 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d35bf782 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ebdbb3e4 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards d8d385b1 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 8651944b 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 227f084e 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3265427a 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 85acaaf8 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards c2c3d364 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 33e77df5 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18% [...] discards f6648150 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 494575f4 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 09bd9173 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 8 [...] discards 4969ff27 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards b9814264 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards 6253d276 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 1f1489fa 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 2b172047 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] discards b8e11697 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deliv [...] discards cd91877d 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 9200ac96 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 558ce53b 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 61f45da2 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3aaab744 5: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 8654afeb 4: force: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 1295537f 3: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 564 commits discards b48d2436 2: onsuccess: #384: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 3209 commits new b795f2d6 onsuccess: #384: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 280211a6 3: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 564 commits new 162348d3 4: force: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new ec8a42fa 5: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new aa7dbff2 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 46813b15 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9902ddc4 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new 157570fe 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 7af6dad4 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deliv [...] new a7e1da37 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] new f52dc7cb 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 06c8d0e3 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new e81c7ec2 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new ebdc22af 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new 0bc295c2 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 8 [...] new fb357d95 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new cdef1f80 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 4e04eee3 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18% [...] new 103d4ee3 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new c069ae17 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new fdbb4d71 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new fd4cf999 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c909e6ef 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 4be86230 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new da5c19de 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new d02b76a2 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fa8669d0 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new fca27923 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new fefa7e93 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new dfb8da7d 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21% [...] new a8e0c2ca 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 2d64b6fc 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 7d4cd57f 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 5521f233 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new ce9859da 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 0 [...] new 692497a3 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 7e57140c 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 123689a5 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 184de131 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 52cd4cb8 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 0e7cee83 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new cd71e3af 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new 6e13c40f 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK afte [...] new 25c418ce 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run O [...] new 9e4b58b7 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 1fb4687c 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 3744efd1 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK a [...] new a52617f6 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 85333026 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a10897c9 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 090451f7 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bin [...] new c45112da 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after gd [...] new 752bd5ca 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 27984c20 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 30f96e2e 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] new e828c621 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 64505 [...] new 530a67c2 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new cbc5e9fd 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 3628f3db 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build af [...] new 201aa83b 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpoi [...] new 3c82e2d3 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new dd8a6c4f 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new e3d743e1 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slowe [...] new 9d3aed9d 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 commits new 1b894fd5 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 417326a4 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] new 62cb07b6 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new ff2178a4 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0e0bce06 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 204e3c3b 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 39e12c53 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step_ [...] new 0c3741b0 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 01f0681c 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 28fcbdf4 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new ce497694 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 04b5dae4 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0545fd16 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c2f7ae2c 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -21 [...] new 5a1167fe 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-45596 [...] new 7063a39f 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% a [...] new 9c5cb107 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% af [...] new a1f3dc53 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% a [...] new 8899ef96 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new faf6bc84 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] new 40f7b712 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new bf430fa5 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 1810f971 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 85a4aa17 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new f6a35de3 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 3460d178 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8a8186aa 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] new 661295be 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new 9237c465 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 58 [...] new 5c42dd73 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new b32abced 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b7fbac02 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 999b95f6 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 commits new 45f2967f 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new 7f338bbb 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462- [...] new 4597ba7b 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 9c21a18d 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 0c7b9812 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 4189c890 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 24774f83 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ef8665f7 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6ee59876 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a14617cc 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new d08ce866 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 9521ca6e 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 84f348ca 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new f0b1fe31 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 8bbcbdba 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 86748e6e 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6abf2a91 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 89a7dfaf 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6ae24645 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new afcb661a onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6a279231 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ee43a95c onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 02f9ea3a onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new bce4cbef onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new fb46d8b1 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6404b338 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2dbec548 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new be742c8a onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f18a4304 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new a8af6db9 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new f6eeecfe onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 602c31d2 onsuccess: #103: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 0cb68f26 onsuccess: #104: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 901537ae onsuccess: #105: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (4590283a) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 131 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: