This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 3b2a7af9e6 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 35219ebde2 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 03bafc9e57 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards dbca03449b 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 8509eb38bf 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 93cec4390c 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 9e62534d49 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 3ae06a6ba0 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards 07870021ab 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 1ec3bc869f 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 780c638528 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards d3b154675c 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 23b207301f 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards d64b8ca55a 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 25ce7e85f1 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b63d05ec8b 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0e69e1b57a 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards e1bc949674 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards bb6610d4a5 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 438df0dcda 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards a59bffa242 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 0844b880fa 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d2f53b8dc7 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 7474f12500 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 59eb16480d 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards cc0ec5e48d 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards 4581095e29 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 68b32a9c6d 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards df423edb5d 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d44260b86a 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 53c42e3476 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 7583a4e5a3 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards fd6b3b8595 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards ac9e37b7c9 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards fd0f8c4553 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards e1fcab4b3d 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 1fef0e8679 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards bb61cfa5e5 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards e54fca4335 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards ded18382ce 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards b101fca975 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards 7bcbcb3439 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards d7f782de35 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 8b085b5b3f 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards fcbb2d7827 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards c12cba0e99 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 2805522b4d 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards f7a7c039f9 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 33732988e7 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards 040a8a2483 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 2ef1477cfa 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 17c0e1beb2 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ef19dfb007 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards dfd73f4cf0 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards 4f63207e99 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4fba5732ac 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 311790043a 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 4e8e54df1a 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 2754ecc3ca 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards b1bc1d352b 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards a3a6a4f184 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 625765b938 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 99f2331836 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 76b48d5284 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4e1e3df073 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 4d5a9c42d6 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 25c31e1948 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 1d303ad13a 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards f3de4809c0 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 75896f5adc 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 55663bc800 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards 2063dc6fee 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 0d552acbc2 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards bd81ab23ea 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards dc478d1646 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards 3d5150ef90 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards a66cd44e6e 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards 4eee15a14c 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards ac06fc3321 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 19ed25b8ce 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 64fd452518 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 2aba97cd6f 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 9f93b81a40 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b4de1bf8cf 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 6900b7d9f7 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 23786edf39 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards e1d7118843 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] discards 86c063d12e 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 2c554b9022 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards b236061767 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 315709bc74 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards 3276d023b1 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards 5c9f5f220a 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards e5ffc55ba7 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards fa8f903642 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] discards cb319e0364 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] discards 74aef28262 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 0320873083 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards a0ad456927 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 945aff4c9d 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards db00c0c006 5: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7197815628 5: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 97d575da48 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 37b7802656 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 39bda83faf 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 727bed10d3 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new bd961bba19 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] new b16fd1e7fd 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] new 64c2518ba1 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 7a67b4858c 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 5e04f18b74 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new 313fc761ef 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new ebeed05ec8 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 681cbab3b3 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new a590ec475e 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new a310b253ad 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] new 50f1aebfd1 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 9d5206efdb 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 49ee3841cd 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 644e9a52ed 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ecabf6cea2 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 11e1a6a7ee 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 094ef15d3a 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 4e93e2621a 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4dcbadb5f2 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new c9e792b900 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new df6d232abe 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new ca4121cb6e 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new 073ba8401a 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 2b703d2646 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 101cb8d3e1 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 09f220c676 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new c5818ffa1e 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 456ad9e37c 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new aef7d40a48 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 39cb4c0398 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 4ead472327 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 3932d71aa3 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 4a14c1abfa 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 01c97d0612 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 7743e77588 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new ab62669740 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 20f79935a7 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 37e8af415f 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new a68432c1b9 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 45f1225f36 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new a3be764758 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c721c9926d 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5e1c4cc8e1 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new a51bc82be5 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new f53ca1c7f3 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 24150239f3 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 3a8c0af86c 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new 0acf591115 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new 977ff544ce 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 0764203cdd 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 95946ecff4 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 49e412c572 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new 56b2f6f3c9 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 4dd8d9cf91 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new ca0110d04a 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new 7a57a9402c 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new 9c77126b17 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new c923169c7e 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new c69b3eada3 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new fc5501dd1a 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6f8f2b67a8 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 49dae9f551 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 65bf5248e9 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new f55c4254bc 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 96a0a7e86f 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new f5a91570cb 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new 4cbba32308 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 5dcd522e5e 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8588bf9c3c 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b9d9ee112d 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 960297c001 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new 778fd45368 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 958c634434 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new cc30d5821b 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 263fc054e7 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 644c00ab96 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 53f33f22f7 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new 137b75d3e1 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new aeda11dd3d 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 4873e67e28 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new c190da0f7d 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 77d5b138e1 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d296e77d4d 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 36eaa52956 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new c98f6398f2 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 572ea97ec0 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 3698b3c82c 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0602f22ed3 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new cd420fdd4e 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new 08c4785583 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new fdd2090fb8 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new 3ea0641cc7 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 1167e3cd86 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 648957f7ee 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 5a23c8f819 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new da44dab7f8 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 576822624b 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (3b2a7af9e6) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2012 -> 2020 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2516 -> 2496 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27028 -> 27192 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 89908 -> 89932 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8304 -> 8384 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233524 -> 233132 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 211764 -> 212044 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 188 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 186 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4360 -> 4252 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 174 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 17120 -> 16492 bytes .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 4 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 70 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/notify.sh | 2 +- manifest.sh | 32 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 238 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 32 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 32 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2946 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3335 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 92282 ++- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 710351 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 24986 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 44 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 114 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3288 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 252 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 252 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3224 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 242 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 10 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2912 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3411 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 58934 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 724845 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 25330 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 66 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2944 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3335 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 92282 ++- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 710351 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 24986 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 114 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3468 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 252 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 252 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3968 +- results_id | 2 +- 60 files changed, 1287715 insertions(+), 1212215 deletions(-)