This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 96e9fbea7e 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 0faf8fedc2 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards b4205b8e82 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 299763f352 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 4a8667b4a2 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 762dbab0d5 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 7c9cf9c8de 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 2acf1a4f88 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 969b61a068 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards fc5c7ab527 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1f80f33e33 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards add8c3eb19 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards e50c9a693c 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 2ca5c129f4 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 70abded69e 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards b8857b7b04 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 9a5b3a0c8e 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 884525cc9e 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards c301c0669a 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 92a94f8c80 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 27388074a0 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards 58041efbe8 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards e6a91971b2 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards b3974c6f4f 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 11028a265c 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fa56dcdbd3 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ebe195ab45 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards b751694240 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards c7a9c75a69 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards f46a378924 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 714c27ed58 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 597af15aa1 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards ecfabd8f3e 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 1551701f25 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards fe186d6494 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 8e07b31d55 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards 597cbfeca5 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards fde9913e1e 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 452479b9cd 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e512a63c87 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards e950acb920 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 90bf78c69d 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 5d84af3347 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 7d76260e13 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards 1cffa4b956 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards c9f9d90d56 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 0372d50db3 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 33283c7483 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 83fd52a2d9 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 47ff350420 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 8d2a2b0f36 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards a76f7102a6 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards 884afab68d 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 827f06cda4 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards c957eb2ed2 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards 4d0307f12c 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards e34dc02595 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b4ed5e68c2 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 14cedb2a7d 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards 51e58965af 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 3706eb2ce2 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards b5d03b90e9 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 49ce58d2cf 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 38d243e559 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards ca88ce36ca 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4fe5e9aa25 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0675711dea 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 3426f47dcd 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards c276b39d2d 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 5be6f8314f 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards e2735f5aa0 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 935f92a4cc 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 07fe1f96bb 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards a492231115 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0167feba57 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 4a4d35aaa4 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards b4efe64927 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 4383ffa8fc 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards c1d56942d6 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 53fde7a069 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 5749885580 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards 36d66d5edf 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 4665dc7d4f 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 5a1326be5b 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 4fd72ce869 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards 8579a7e873 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 3a80ab176a 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards 88f4be130a 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 5e8afbc488 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 4575b284cd 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards a8961ff790 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards ea62d5fa9f 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 26fda1f32e 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8abdc7264c 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 837765a060 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 64281de9e4 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards fe1227517e 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] discards 78a373a26b 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards ed292c188a 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 97872a55c2 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards d3ca61c108 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new 8d5e5e21f3 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new a1af97b427 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 6eb7503700 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 0ee676eef2 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 7a32fd003f 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] new 503f46d23f 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new a1c5ba1e1f 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 4f8b54faaa 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new d6528a1d1d 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6e85016ce9 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 7d1434d8fe 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 2802f5834b 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 7390623763 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b652f73bac 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new c82dc57ec1 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new f2c69e8b08 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new cb6ff5dc24 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new db8d30974b 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 3c16a7396e 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 3c517a3efb 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 10aebd8372 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new 99d9fc1f2e 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 3eb0307791 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 3084f823e2 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 39ed74a4fa 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new b92224e9e8 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new a3996038eb 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 5d0ea01b7f 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 74ad211c64 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 541375ec78 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 065652b392 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 2b7b5326c5 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new eebf28557a 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 1a994b49b7 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new df7992e96f 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new ec58017351 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 386e1a3e04 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 963c441f5d 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new a10fb69c2b 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 69639d399c 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b9dde31dc5 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 258004c223 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new fb68856dc1 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new 54efc7af11 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 7a57c45b3a 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 847a4b1cc0 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 2ecc5f0c2a 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new 9407fc0207 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 33dd44ebbe 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 7b5c9d1cea 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new 4afc4ea8b6 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new 539a689048 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new dd28eb4302 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new df25577dee 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new f8a0031d89 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e97d017e11 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new bb7d52cde8 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 5da32d32f8 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new cb13932f5f 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 8ec6d23487 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 59e460e261 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new 5c43324f83 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new ac4ebe9ccd 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 32d6f8a528 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new cf1a541811 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 8a169be629 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new e8e446a866 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 0623d9b376 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new 3a11a552db 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 66f460ac52 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 131123e66e 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new ae18cd6abf 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new 6e21af5b23 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new a5905e1188 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 0c1b9187cb 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 7b22828107 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 03c773c1b9 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1ea2450d1d 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new c0ba489a88 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new 637b2933e2 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new a963fad8d5 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new e5cf76636c 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dfdd54c883 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 2d4d3673db 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new 6ad6008349 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new 89f082416c 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new dc21f6d880 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 9a1913c914 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 97d58d1e58 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 707fc56afe 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 9fd467a9a4 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 21a000000c 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 09aa708fb0 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 40a3d43097 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new b855b58168 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 616220f911 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new df9c958af2 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new d3085fb2e4 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 60cd0cfe83 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new d95a46b053 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 9ee03516b9 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 41fa29b6d9 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (96e9fbea7e) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2160 -> 2120 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2432 -> 2540 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27108 -> 27944 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17740 -> 17960 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90496 -> 90940 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 70096 -> 71004 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8476 -> 7772 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233592 -> 235252 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185584 -> 185860 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 211700 -> 213808 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 179800 -> 180180 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 209 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 207 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4164 -> 4064 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 175 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 20056 -> 18244 bytes .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 2 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 4 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 6 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 48 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 38 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 240 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2842 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 721290 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 714914 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28122 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 64 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3212 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3378 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 801627 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 804425 ++++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28484 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 60 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 133 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3389 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 249 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 249 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3432 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 248 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 19 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3143 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3355 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 750615 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 753340 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28718 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3212 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3378 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 801627 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 804425 ++++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28484 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 60 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 133 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3509 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3992 +- results_id | 2 +- 70 files changed, 3252620 insertions(+), 3053164 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff