This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.
discards 95434bd3e onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c4db66d24 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 40f6e0e46 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 60ce4cdf2 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6b29de4e7 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 65a5555fb onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ca5dfa5da onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d2a88c818 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 65cf6b43e onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0d170a3b1 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 156390105 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 0ec8d6255 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a5e521817 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b31dbfdf4 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ded8f59df 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 9e89bffa0 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 5b6feb91a 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f599c52a4 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 15501d848 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards cc5680171 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards fa9de2426 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7c516c2a1 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ca040948d 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 0494ba5b1 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards dbfac1284 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards e887c7987 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 2f6a252bb 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 1408f5259 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards fea21db26 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 1d5a01581 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 95599b7a6 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 15647634f 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards cd42c679e 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 032bf29d5 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 06829e318 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 24d1058cf 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 3ccb8df79 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 1a998ab10 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 71a26947a 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards a87eaf1e6 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards ba90ad2c9 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards a179dbfaa 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 5578e604c 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f9490f75b 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 74b5d2827 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 226afa438 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 634b96515 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 60d956ec0 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c00ef6e7c 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards fa63595a6 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards da8093bf2 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 6180b5745 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards e5d6285d3 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 3590b0eae 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 273160a9b 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards a70a73fc3 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 39c770924 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 8d7865fc0 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 9b281d4a1 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 3581e9119 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 241f754f7 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 63b643f13 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards f09d71868 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 254a5b8cc 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 7c577098f 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards a07aef1c3 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 994641e74 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 6abb07022 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards db941b4a9 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards ab13f32f3 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 00fde2b4b 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 0753bcea2 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 448f0b483 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards cea554a9e 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 2917fe429 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 2bedcf76a 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 33ff779ff 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards e9b1d61dc 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 670248a6c 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 17434cddb 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new cb80cda61 onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new e855ee4a2 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new fa6960fd5 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 321493922 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 4002da31c 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new e830849e7 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 5d37ec0b3 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 2c2e32bf9 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 0020c3247 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new c20a4790c 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new b083c02dc 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 76c58c231 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 937973801 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new d7f61ebe1 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 856cd2325 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 77ae3ba78 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new bbd39ea01 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new d784598d0 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 379c2c914 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 31afb988d 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 225dd1120 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 134724e03 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 60de5b534 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new ebb0cba56 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 4aee0cac9 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 01cf861c2 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new d530300f6 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new ccfc480d8 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 5b9f983f9 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 92bf0fc4f 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new aa7f122eb 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 0d3c0d391 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new f3774bc22 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a2f8fec0c 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 2dfc99a2b 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 5b5663752 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 528269779 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 3ddbcca83 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 514208fe0 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new c4a2ac16e 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new a0d4bde4e 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 086ac61dd 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 5683fc58b 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new a79972dbb 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new f45f1d6ed 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 37a9ebb53 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new e0ff01877 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new b5b854f3a 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new ca52dbbef 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new fac77ad94 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new b516a322b 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 8aeb0ddf6 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new b6d93fc94 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 9a1a2ff82 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 36192e143 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new f6aff3330 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 753179758 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 13670bc2d 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new fb13fe4b7 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 00bc20db2 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ee2ebc530 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6c547cd49 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 0d30aba71 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f2e590d21 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new eed08699e 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 5b57f4f7b 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 801b80d81 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3eb995a61 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 75a59db20 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 754c88b68 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3e956efb6 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 70d0097af onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 611bb033f onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 61699753e onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f4e55e23b onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0128176bf onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 21e604dd4 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8aa7e1739 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new f7be59b26 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new f5245d53a onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (95434bd3e) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 80 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: