This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.
omits 7a30f719 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits c1076404 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits 6add1a0b onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits eda175a5 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 72108ed4 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 37380837 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 11edd630 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 132f09f1 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits dc1fe721 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 478f1471 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 946e9ed0 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits aa8b8e9b 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits bacbc6d9 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 51e4f010 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 2127b849 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits 15d9daf2 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 0114925c 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 5bc38d36 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 768c627d 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 029affaa 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 98549a20 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 07724bb6 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 7589169f 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 7c100be7 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits d7230780 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] omits cffd0240 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] omits f939e74a 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits 21b3a933 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] omits f0e971bd 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] omits 95f4e0a5 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] omits 32685572 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] omits 155c2388 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits 614a405e 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] omits af443c33 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] omits f71fd4f2 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] omits 5cc886ed 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits 0649c3a2 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits omits 4d0129e2 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] omits ee471e1f 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] omits 98b823f4 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits omits 5121a9a5 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits omits ace42127 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits e6dbeae0 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits bfc4997d 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 9021389b 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] omits 2dcaa49e 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits cea69862 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] omits 7c65d612 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 525380e5 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] omits 05ca58e5 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 49ced734 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] omits 307545e8 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 2db72d60 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits f4f74346 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits e1ac4534 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits bb6306a5 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 05305c54 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 76aad485 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] omits 1b18627d 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits 0bfb714d 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits 58dc1528 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] omits 0c87e27b 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits edea5c16 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits ca0d1626 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] omits f885a6d4 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] omits 2c3a4953 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] omits ec01948e 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits 405cf4e8 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] omits 71a29540 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] omits c1710fa2 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 6f7827ab 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] omits 9c26ec4b 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits omits 07c90664 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] omits 03595e19 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits omits a764ed4e 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] omits 6379c186 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] omits b736d54a 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits bf61c6ce 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] omits 7486cf1d 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits 8785d657 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 34ed8b2a 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits c968fd3c 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits b1d587ec 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 9343fb63 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 371d914a 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 67fdde9a 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] omits d452c3c1 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] omits fbe3f167 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits omits 865bb05c 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits omits e671b453 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] omits 9a15cc7a 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] omits e0354b3d 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits omits 77165bbe 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits d8afe3d7 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits 48de4e5d 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] omits 548d9d61 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits omits ee1a28a2 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 8fc8620c 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 766e8e25 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits d7d806af 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] omits 3af99d07 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] omits 7462f4f5 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 3bfe7a2f 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 2c47111c 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits e9aba9bd 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] omits 4f7ddffd 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] omits 0ddff065 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 398e96bd 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] omits 90d2837b 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 94c0148b onsuccess: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 17497c12 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] new d7ada8bb 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f49e78da 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 5dc091ae 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new c996c5d6 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fc05f224 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0a86c714 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1b3157d8 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 46910f82 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 39d277f9 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b27f9064 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 90ea1155 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new abf12af3 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 228c967b 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 7f03bd73 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 54e5dca7 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 8489ba37 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 7a1bf02e 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 0bfd2772 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 0222b08f 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 7daa72a2 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 2a2b2032 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 84d7430b 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new bb9d78b9 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6d5036fe 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ee7b1199 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 69ce3c8d 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8f57aa4c 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new fc4a4536 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dd766c05 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 60c2c96e 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 5950a9fa 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 7b1aaa37 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 10ef6d73 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 9dced195 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new d59e3f46 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 697fe537 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new e15ac06e 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 8e3d4a7a 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 1ada8f83 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 4caaa3c0 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 7d2d4ac9 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new a219c2d3 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 1728445d 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new c7f03c4c 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 8199ad38 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new d5deef77 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 7c0d5d44 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new f3e65a54 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new fb661df1 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new b20b9495 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 065cad34 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 16900903 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 86ae9656 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new d7e79f0c 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e2cf2026 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 1f12f98c 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 6f63c4d3 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 827d425a 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new cfa8a0e5 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 49ec6081 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new cc44aac4 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 96ac009c 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 5c4b32d0 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 459bb67e 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6ec797d2 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 94681653 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 48a2f022 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 674b4d87 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new da36bb26 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new df9b2755 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 820e0218 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 7642db18 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new a1bfdb57 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new b2b60d3d 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new f5ed700a 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new f3f5055a 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 10791bb4 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 8432fd7a 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new a3861d8b 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 81d90343 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 175ad9d9 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new f15cdcbd 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new f01975ea 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 44747065 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3e91ce24 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3f84ef5d 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1148383b 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b7038e0e 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 306a4a02 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 122cb756 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 35cae6b7 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new df7c2fc7 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ee77a2a4 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 45d5faa7 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 9a7adc61 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 746bff83 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 714aec7d 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 01d93acd onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c9b1c628 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6fc67df4 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c637a836 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cbda4edb onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e8238697 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cefd9aa6 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b9dda536 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 780e5ef6 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 77240d25 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (7a30f719) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 109 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: