This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 6cb5f2d856a 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards d033577a0a1 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 98d4f1a1da8 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 698ecde71f7 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 361e953efba 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 7b2a4b1b4a9 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards e9d543250e2 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 208fc379702 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards dfe6dceeecb 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1b557a2fcf7 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards b3ef97f0de4 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 728113df8ad 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4abd19a6f40 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards f95e8c6c2f9 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] discards add64d828ac 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 64ac3d521eb 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 5dca8525420 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 93a3af17612 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f5d8b6e6d59 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 20c9d14bbae 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 99a4dac8374 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards 065845f6cbc 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16 [...] discards 6c6ed4f1ac4 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards daf431944df 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] discards d98c065ba88 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 402231fc302 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 169 [...] discards 73f95f9d8ef 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 433ab097d68 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 1ef9103b47b 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19 [...] discards 35361991df3 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 71d4e82af8b 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11 [...] discards 143bcfc006c 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards f1a6a2c5e3d 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 53ab1cd4ae7 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards dfbdf06c3b2 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards 82004a3bec3 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 8cb939479dc 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 66ad4ff9879 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 104a7a15ad2 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] discards ea5fe27e9c1 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 79b4286d968 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards cfb2b9fdaf8 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 534595c868a 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 79790e48514 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 80d1a38daaf 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards 41dd00cd06b 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards ad8854a21ce 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 0ad55b08a17 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards e1c747a6d25 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] discards 69282325d50 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards d1892fc636c 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 90cf6642d77 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.900 [...] discards f25961cbfc9 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 0127dcf101c 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards aa864653b65 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 7d74ea4d167 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards d535e723be8 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 522514bb4f5 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 61330798ef1 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards a4e6f2d3763 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards 2aa27a2be1f 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] discards 983c796a298 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards cf95922fa1a 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 8bf49d4af7b 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 354ed39985e 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.3 [...] discards 15d69b769b2 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK [...] discards e3abc083dd2 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 652d50b810a 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 5d83f6adbc7 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 9a14de289fc 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check [...] discards 56697bfb8f2 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards a2f806ffbb3 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 7e967b72b3d 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 70a225006ca 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 483382b26a9 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 17eed029335 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards d1cca583234 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 5d2ad7adc19 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 302efe29570 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 2bef1911469 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 06141f7662e 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 0038f42c840 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] discards 14c9deae92b 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards 91451e8f7c3 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] discards 894ce91ebe6 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards d3ca90d6e6c 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 7171fbe6564 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards 327a205a265 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards fe1dca1afb9 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards c68e54f4d01 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards e8a9fe5feab 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 93a6ba0b1f1 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 12 [...] discards 418d82a4412 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 [...] discards 135c513d0fe 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by [...] discards 4077426e578 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards a641ffdf3dc 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards f76b454bd02 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards db950d822a6 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14 [...] discards 7162a2ef079 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed d [...] discards 68ba25cc153 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% aft [...] discards 38d056dd4d5 6: force: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII built and run OK af [...] new 4a375a3b8a0 6: force: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII built and run OK af [...] new 8e4ecdf6325 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% aft [...] new e121775acaa 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed d [...] new 59685d7b28b 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14 [...] new c9e83a645c2 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 05305ab6751 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 887dbb96d80 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 25490eb9d4d 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by [...] new f7fcdee07e9 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 [...] new 5985b8b3dd8 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 12 [...] new b3ea758f54c 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new b55952482f6 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new a6680ec1290 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new c2b1e8747e4 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 48c6ca72466 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new 8f796ff356b 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 65bfabd56b5 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new e51d2e8497d 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] new c57250374a2 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new 8c07afa9e64 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] new 43013297ed7 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 6d534653710 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 2b2962d71a9 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 525e684c2fe 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 9b64c694619 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new 73a91ed1856 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 67dea662425 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 50c071a93da 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new b5c0a086923 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new f82affe8bd5 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 9ae5b5ad744 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 4d6e30fed3a 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check [...] new 9a4c375f388 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 58a60b06ba9 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 2c2b708060a 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new f67ee5403ba 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK [...] new 51e32c26db6 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.3 [...] new 7ffa3201f01 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 5d9287cab2e 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new 60fa980aae6 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b6d4b4c4458 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] new f8d71e2344f 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 73fea491378 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 296a369eb0c 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new 9fa940e3455 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 423f51e86e6 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new afe1554b309 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new eeb3a4fa309 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 05b6ed1d67c 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 091d7107a8a 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.900 [...] new 5bafdd98525 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 60eec4c9d22 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new abb2015f95c 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] new 2138b436311 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 328d4b3da98 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new 6c283553242 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new f0433842196 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 3b2bed500ae 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 0dc17a0449c 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 15c82d0cefc 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ca5b9944595 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3df32454e48 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 2cb57957488 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] new 0105608cc0c 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 96827c07c1d 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 0166c763450 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 08b176a5455 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 669fe8983d8 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 1dc8a7e579e 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 624289d55b9 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 161d5d44060 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11 [...] new 31c347f773b 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new d3fe8577e7c 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19 [...] new 2f5ff1b40fd 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new b6950107509 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 248cfae7d46 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 169 [...] new 4c844113a9d 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new c2568b4ae70 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] new d20c1b81c93 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new 4625631131e 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16 [...] new 4e997069c17 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new 362e5c86208 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1be8b459d7f 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2fc7e03eadc 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0bc7929bd5f 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 9a653bda493 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 91477a454ef 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6c9466c254b 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] new c3218ce346c 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new a202db8752d 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 86f6f956a9f 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new c3533e59b32 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 01609ba21cf 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new a302e76402e 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 543f35dcceb 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new bae10192588 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new ea445bb2ab5 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 89993b00783 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 8b8768ebc42 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 285da959e12 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new f6d8830353c 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 596a2e59579 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (6cb5f2d856a) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2184 -> 1940 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2488 -> 2436 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27008 -> 27176 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90420 -> 89984 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8524 -> 8532 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233128 -> 232948 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 211256 -> 211548 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 158 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 156 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4096 -> 4132 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 166 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 17856 -> 19616 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.improvement | 2 + 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 2 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 6 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 6 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 6 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 50 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- mail/exe.improvement | 2 + manifest.sh | 16 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 235 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 30 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 30 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2518 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3220 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 806113 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 790622 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 17441 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 459 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 131 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3259 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 249 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 249 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3999 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 234 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 8 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2875 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3055 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 4738 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 658530 +++++++------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 27762 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 414 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2518 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3220 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 806113 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 790622 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 17441 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 459 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 131 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3377 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 249 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 249 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3629 +- results_id | 2 +- 58 files changed, 2011969 insertions(+), 1942922 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff create mode 100644 mail/exe.improvement