This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.
discards ca766b37e onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards d09051a91 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 9331c5db1 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards b23071c40 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 343706028 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 11aabcd19 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 128c09618 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6f85819d3 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 77647f512 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 855e13054 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 340978d74 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 4b841906f 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 6b11a4eda 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 6eb3455bc 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards cd7debd0f 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards f3bfb5dea 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e26b636e0 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2f2fbf4c2 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards edab41eda 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3f2a5813f 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d6f9855b8 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a84e06de4 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards faafdb469 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ec65cb7f0 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 13d1d27e2 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 0705d124e 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 029cf4c91 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 4c74178f6 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards a9e2912b3 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards decf4cea5 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards f3d8b6afa 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards fa2230cbb 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards c98185be7 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 862e6088d 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 8779d576e 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 16bd002a4 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards fe7ed319a 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 31a8efa0e 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards e0da085f9 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 3b219d9f6 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 5a1c5255c 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards df37f147a 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards d5f4cc9d9 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards cbe105489 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f0e2fafbe 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 9bbffe851 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards e594bdf17 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 563751d61 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d7f77fc38 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards d17d495ac 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 675439994 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 3e55364fb 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 20349f33c 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards f15b481af 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards c2193050f 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 7e3ad9ef8 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 9b629cb93 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 02f93aeb3 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 8e308e57d 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards d06faed14 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards b6d9e2d2b 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 41f117e81 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 5dae9d975 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 2fb901c25 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards d53879538 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards fde55f76c 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 69a3d10ae 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards ece57b01e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 0c35687e8 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards b46f13a37 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 0a50643fc 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 14b0d05eb 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 20f8a05ad 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 875aacc84 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards da6294822 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards d0d6a9faf 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards e32e65a24 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards c3ff3b161 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 4ab1dbbda 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 585c890fd 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8da8c0293 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 2344eece1 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 27a6126ef 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2670267f6 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 909056b05 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fa7d018c0 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 4395396b9 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards b9074f7aa 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards e3ce5d5b2 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards ca6751771 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards 8da6cd5f7 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 87070f0fa 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 97029ba53 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 26f3fcf98 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards fd1f7f67e 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 4f898bbf2 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 0ad81d281 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c9e417eb7 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b60ce2ba2 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1f039b156 onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 9de76f637 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bfec643d8 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d23ed10de 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new ea2fe246e 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 15c4bd1c0 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 09fee16d3 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 0eb0eb542 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new b4057dee5 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 2d6b484cf 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new c2ae96794 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new aefa5533d 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new b9fda40f6 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 0ad520714 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new ab5206215 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1bbe8f01e 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a0904c34b 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 712b03f01 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new cd020a862 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new a07470935 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 445dc11f6 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new dc665041a 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 1145c96d5 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new ce1d7ef47 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new fcd76b161 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new a2cfc528e 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 4b2266a28 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 6aad35923 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 76362d01c 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 757e87aa2 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new a3b00b1fc 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 8ac3355ce 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new cc74a0db9 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new d863f3d07 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 3ae11afdc 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new c7d94b64c 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new aa0a18e5b 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new c57f3c9db 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e96073feb 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new e6e9e987f 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 88564ee5b 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new e72b1f669 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 0dab8e2a8 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new e4098ca26 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new cdc182030 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new c35bc34e1 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 60d9128d9 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 0ac072cbf 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 3eac030ff 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 5d759bc57 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new ba1831638 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 8992760e1 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 431644813 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new cd9b8e37e 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new d123f8ebb 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 15c135d0a 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a22342635 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1434304f4 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new a4967f590 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 94352356c 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 3e79c1247 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 33105ffb6 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 213f7dd12 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new dc9feb243 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 9daa5af2e 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 03d1994aa 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 4f1927a99 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 72142f913 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new fb31f5b80 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new f4d098cb3 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 11051d410 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new cfe1c9dce 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 09bf12be8 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new c591e399d 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new aa1462dbf 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 0e133ac97 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e02f31af9 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2dc3d72bb 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4bfddb331 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b09e09cf1 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 217bae06f 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b019a507a 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b258570b7 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d28094563 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e80d1c870 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 57e34e26d 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ea18a6d86 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new f3a0097ea 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 060451b07 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 9e1d2b96d onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 21408b1d8 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cd8a3eadb onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 61ac45d51 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2bbe6795c onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5c50caa0f onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f70df45dd onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7c7c4aeaf onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new f2a90d28d onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 156df56b0 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (ca766b37e) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 99 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: