This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards e03862b0cd onsuccess: #86: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards f2ba3978ee 120: onsuccess: #85: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 7421079684 119: onsuccess: #84: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards aca725b902 118: onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards c9b553fa1c 117: onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 331466a347 116: force: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 1dbaf91dbe 115: onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 3e3ade055f 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 32a11e6974 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 3511687f47 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards be2a775942 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1d3fdc130b 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards dbd5282ee6 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 5a6d937d67 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards b74abb9a9c 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 3d197944de 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a2b45768ea 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards b773032423 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 1e63e3662e 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 355968dd6b 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards fe39713d17 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards efa485f0cc 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 97102b3314 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d6c11d8acc 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 704e308ad8 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 47ec0a47a7 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards c2fb8d082e 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards a36583bdd8 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards 8740d6646a 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 1721511702 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a0ae2ad2ea 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards dbe31586f4 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards c13df62ca9 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4a34d6e2f5 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a6945d6805 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0c4aadad22 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards dbeaaa830d 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards aca9698c80 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards 14b571b336 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards f64cd25124 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 18579bef0e 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] discards 41adab7173 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 14b1a1aa42 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] discards da80ae7775 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards 7a47aa440d 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards a2c3c6dfe6 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards 87c09b2a69 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards cf8eeb7183 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 7a864b30d1 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 1fcb4e75b7 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards f687463927 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards fb7523e926 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 2ce1accab2 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6860bc8e69 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 0a6c2e5549 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards e5826cd949 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 76718f3713 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 87bd3e72f3 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards cb6d2c2ee5 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards ced867c619 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards c917bc9b29 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 0d309d0755 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 2489ce5e07 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 3c8a5d3adf 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 58076cfe58 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards e33437d90c 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ef006b8811 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] discards 1c3bdd3fed 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards c1c658cca5 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards b1f220be15 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards cd581ab03f 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 4162ef4138 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 247a588f2f 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 6ddda476ac 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 8c482a1b8b 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards 48ddd8e598 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 74d73362f9 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 38309f953f 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 27f1e5d071 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] discards a20c340e12 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] discards 010ad9ae93 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] discards 05c7b524e4 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards a604e20a1d 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 314ec0c425 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 0822925366 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] discards 9c10ee59d6 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 5c9a9b8b6f 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards aed5f20eca 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2bb0a1a6ed 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ddb4536102 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 1394d3a336 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 8582da8eab 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 43fa74663d 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 60dc688575 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 5cf029765d 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f52e276ec9 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 9550f4dc47 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 54058739b1 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards 4fad217977 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 70c5851e17 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new 122fab18a0 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new dd578d8014 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new dc0d945251 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new b69dc67b59 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 33503f91ac 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 9746564de4 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new eaab7372d8 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 573ceee152 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f0f50f2fe9 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new 1bccc64837 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 1808507714 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 977e6fef8f 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 9e1f52ee18 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 074e1138f4 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new c16886c55d 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new a34f87c4e4 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] new bfcdcc8033 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 68d3655fad 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new b87cc340c3 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new f3fca9f046 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] new fede438cd9 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] new 0a84102fa0 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] new 9fec8c69d0 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 9176a53563 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a9cc8e8067 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 6bea1516be 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new c8b0288e9c 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 5dc06fb6a5 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 545cb7aa82 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 8282768358 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new e7696db369 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 51326da6f6 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 0d5650e729 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 3db7784c41 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] new 2cbc718af6 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 0407db3db1 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 691c5f3e7c 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new eefbbfbbff 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 6538cd7aba 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new b65d22f300 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new f5fbfa1bc9 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 4a53c2de04 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new d14c836de4 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new eecbde80ea 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5cd37283b6 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d87e5adbc0 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 7a6a0474b5 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new bba5316d8b 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 850eb310d6 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 2960b31d99 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 55d66bd073 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 6eaad6b3b4 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 10e8209861 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new a4d00ff040 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 0815363661 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new aca02860ed 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new e786cfd9e2 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new c592b807f0 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] new 566dffea66 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 2bbc3dd719 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] new 89c86a602d 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new e8f9341222 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 16fff33aee 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new 0c8561bbed 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new 2414685de0 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new bb85f9c3d2 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7f3bcb0668 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 53dd26dc92 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 583f383326 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new c6d5657677 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 20660af153 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 399aa70c78 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new a0f39e4562 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new 6286d92917 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 9c3079306f 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new a432a2159f 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 35298e3f0e 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 39e66acef2 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6974bf7ce9 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new d730e74425 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 1b28251bd6 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8aa27a4aec 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new d7cc08df36 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 46e759f7b4 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 7a400c5a23 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 1836fa15a5 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 2887d75a19 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 344a95331b 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new e007e1d383 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new d4f4e87227 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 1eeb9425f5 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 50a708a0a8 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new b705e638b6 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 65f7e795a9 115: onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new a5af7d425e 116: force: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new b0eaafc74e 117: onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 6d56ddec83 118: onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 57a663a081 119: onsuccess: #84: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 9dec5a6994 120: onsuccess: #85: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 193182f316 onsuccess: #86: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 4a93e999fe onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (e03862b0cd) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2408 -> 2376 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2676 -> 2672 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27388 -> 27872 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17928 -> 17976 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 93016 -> 91584 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 69932 -> 69992 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7820 -> 7856 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 235152 -> 234972 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 186032 -> 185924 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 214056 -> 214512 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 178260 -> 179704 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 152 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 150 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4240 -> 4224 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 196 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 17420 -> 16652 bytes .../output-bmk-results/diff-bmk-results.out | 4 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 5 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- manifest.sh | 28 +- results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff | 1 - results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 252 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 6 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2865 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3333 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 551440 ++++++------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 780172 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30710 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 878 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3067 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3304 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 457412 +++++----- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 766965 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30698 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 900 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3439 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 253 +- .../csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff | 0 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 141 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4266 +- results_id | 2 +- 49 files changed, 1307403 insertions(+), 1333820 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff