This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.
discards 1fa9c4c3b onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 71b44dbac onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards ed4be9ec4 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 081d465c6 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 45680f8bb onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 4509fd303 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 961628b0c onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c18f9b29f onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d9b010d59 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 85062adab onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards de61b6812 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 2256e89a1 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 897de87a5 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards de8e59af5 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 276ccbb8b 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards fe6d43346 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 03d9bece7 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 96f11b10a 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards c49d3a337 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 5cad1a9c7 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 57d8c676e 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 24194e7c3 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1cde5bdfa 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e02a7b5fa 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 274a754a4 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 834c1322c 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards ff77ef612 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 0ce53ddb7 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 4b91ec82d 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 0065cbf1c 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 6006b1128 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 2ca0888c8 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 8da801632 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 5274b47be 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards d2e170a54 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 6237f031a 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 0b520f02d 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards ba85c485a 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards d0c1a91ef 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards b46c2b3a0 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards eccd53d69 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 939001429 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards e7d949308 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e80323c68 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 8e6caffaf 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards c53b7ea3d 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 06060dfdc 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 69e53ada7 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 88407d0b9 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 6620fc778 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 20f96c233 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 3a34c4b31 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards afc54e236 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 2f7ebcaf9 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards d31861b50 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards f04efb6a6 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards c287a93af 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 0aaf9f5fa 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 73dd54b8e 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 35f494552 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 2f2d7784a 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 2ae565b51 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards a48a31619 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 17347ea13 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards ee799aa2b 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 200dc74bb 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards fb66b9375 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 17e5f2683 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards d3eaec144 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards d9f9f003c 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards cd50a04b9 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 15a2738dd 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 5317bd2c0 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 2ff29c50f 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 8c182c261 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 8ff456321 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 230300e43 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards b530f6e80 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 23ce3ef45 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 34e1a3c41 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f3c5da61c 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards afb58fb26 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d9548658a 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2bee9be58 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 04d6f15ee 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5ce1200e7 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 5e59f0c58 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 8f33fa588 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards da6b3e35d 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards e20eee68d 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards f283a694d 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards f957caf77 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards a457aeeb5 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 47570e310 onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 45b128cba 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 792d49e55 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new fc3aff3e6 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 76f382fbc 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 9a717e31a 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new ccb18af74 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new a055362f5 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new fb4f43ba8 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0998b60e8 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 652795b49 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 361b80745 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 441353bb9 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new f5fdf5bb1 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d0a4dc35c 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new dc0160f44 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 629587491 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new c06143047 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 9abdc8fe2 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 1a904fff3 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 4d9260be4 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 67a5c1086 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new c463f8788 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 255f62562 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new fd9d5d644 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 69d18aeaa 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 6b46908ec 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 1c6e59b15 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new eb75b4bc3 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 71b0bc0e3 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new ad1655403 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 280d8c9d7 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 3932933cf 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new ca7c6f0bc 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 604a19f2e 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 5c617ff1d 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 95c2e7b69 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 2d042f52b 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 0fd816671 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 35cc8a6f9 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1baded3f1 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 240ce5dcc 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 5d652dd80 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 5efac435f 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 9fce19a8f 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 0aa723d64 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 086c7bea0 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new df2d0bef6 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 879947355 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new c38ebdabd 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 469238242 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b62cf9cda 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new e239cc3cd 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new d3373e5ef 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 782bb9a11 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new becf7c321 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 2036b2813 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new cd9f5b93b 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new b9ec8023a 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new daf0413f1 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 1bc0ede7b 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new ae34e9edb 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 6ffdedd20 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new cbb422961 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new be45af9a4 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new b1c0db0d3 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new ca4e41218 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 61707b974 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new e82e98ccd 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 21e249113 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 816cee4de 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 70d406b60 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 49ad64961 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 26771b72f 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e3b11b26e 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new afe3f7508 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 7cbfa736e 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 0cc56746d 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 0a5ae06fe 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 47032fdff 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new bc61b991e 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 98a3eadfb 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new cded96bf9 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 43fd54303 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a462e9aa8 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7b83c1b74 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f1d8d1b14 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 580705726 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 03ad735d3 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 75cc847ad onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d2f9b1287 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 3d563f603 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new fb2c5d222 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (1fa9c4c3b) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 93 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: