This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards dcd8695b8b 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards ebf27a5b68 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 9a3139cbc2 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 7dd829e296 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1cea6f78b1 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d266f5ec09 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 7b805179d9 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards dff913d074 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards eccac25c85 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards c63771bab1 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards d20f228b12 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 0fd7239f5d 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7e4732a9a6 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 5d345b036f 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards e7f5c93b73 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 069f06bb49 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards dc929971b9 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards cbce8f12d5 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards 836869fdbb 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards 81d2536f0d 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards f477dec3b6 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 8d85ec2f6e 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards f37b48cb4f 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] discards 82811074fd 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 3767b6978b 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] discards 1ec3804825 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards d27847407e 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards bff8a5e389 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards 7b834a41cf 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 5901ed6b75 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards ad840d23aa 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards dfe02b8db9 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards 8809889424 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 37e3d82d72 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 8bec6a93cc 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0faf3cf8a0 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards f4046c04d7 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d03d11fe8c 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b62c9e9f09 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6e07360f45 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c75ee75562 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 2f6106f76b 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards 60b113bef4 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 2eeace3afa 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 51b58fae45 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 2f75a67154 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards fc75ac36da 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards faa7b41073 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards f5b54fd7a4 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] discards 7a9c6b3070 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards dcaa4c536d 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards eb189b7776 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 9c7d0ee90d 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards ed916564d6 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards fce8914fbf 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 03457314dc 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 9089ebe253 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards 914f1ebd74 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards e9d5246f06 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5c2b3c10d8 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 20b207d5af 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] discards 23ffcf1505 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] discards 5bd5b0df2d 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] discards 8be7dca339 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards c3e8df8d5a 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards f9fedce365 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards a617f2941f 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] discards 6208931d8f 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards b60769e48f 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards edb6aef936 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards dd6a3cf4a5 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 6c78fd67d3 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 415e1f0ad3 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards c2d7eed026 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 9b2b1b41d3 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2a58e94b11 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b632162bc8 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 5615882d74 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 52b718ec35 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 25866428f5 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards 90bc709050 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 04487a1287 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards 1c9ceeb5b9 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 400c8d241e 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards d29f5fd3cc 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards 1bfe014126 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards 4e6467e135 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e4c2f779f4 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards e1275c6c3f 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] discards c11e6e118c 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 9ff0be955a 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] discards b1304cc55e 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b0649f7818 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 262b0a64b6 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 3e10e022b7 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14% [...] discards 27a7d5b1df 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed do [...] discards 10aab5a172 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% afte [...] discards 20638302d3 6: force: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII built and run OK aft [...] discards b5e7117d6a 5: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 473eb5aabd 4: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII failed to build afte [...] discards ae7ecda32e 3: onsuccess: #456: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 7624 [...] new d5a26815e1 3: onsuccess: #456: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 7624 [...] new 49d4463d0f 4: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII failed to build afte [...] new 3ef8e95ed0 5: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp slowed down by 7% a [...] new 771306dcb9 6: force: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII built and run OK aft [...] new c642a44f75 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% afte [...] new 1ee2013d36 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed do [...] new da37af6d4d 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14% [...] new de93d61751 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 8b464338ad 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 73ead9ddbc 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 64bf6c82da 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] new 01c5028468 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 79202213e0 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new 8bb5a629fa 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 43a40451bc 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 7ab2c96022 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new 44f299d1e7 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 3ae7e1f70d 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new 7972b43812 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new a664b19ec8 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new c2397bdc68 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new b5fffb32c3 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new d1eaf6c27e 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new e1f5911be2 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 7e8b892d4d 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 454bb29844 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d2203e6e04 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new bf0a4e153b 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new 7da44a927b 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 4d12385964 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new b7b38e718c 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 11dd97e328 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0434040ab4 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 6a660f1c8b 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 79d77d0eb7 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] new ab93c8c21f 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 44f9bb6bf3 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 0820baae59 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 643afeb08f 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] new e7eb6e9015 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] new 425c84e2de 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] new 546904baef 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new a96923bc7e 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b209430557 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new ec557f42f0 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 1cf980ff68 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new da49f621fa 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new e958fea0a4 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new ec18f31fc8 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new de2f7414e6 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 7d5f6db6fe 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 9d7c83efe5 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new e45195c994 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] new 5caf6b9d3f 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 147614a801 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new ce3a816f16 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 5269d87db2 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new e192a0b2ff 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new e716cf9c2d 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 4730974bf9 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new b72e902936 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 4c61093f48 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d7ad022c48 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5de3136eea 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d6ff8f500f 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new f51d11a96d 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 2c0640d1a4 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 733306741e 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new ea33c37428 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 9e3398cb06 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 97f32a4339 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new dbee639a0d 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new 03345f8a99 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new af3a11061d 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new 9f382f9950 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 52d6dfe1ed 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new e92e1706ed 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] new dbb4e4a762 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 1b340b183d 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] new 75e79069ab 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 70f82512e3 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 2dc041774a 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new 5a6807f933 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new 7206e05b87 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new 5ac815ecd2 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a7a45ef41a 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 981736dbd0 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5ee72e6078 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 429db9051c 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new e1b3d5b56f 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 06f461ff7f 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new efe5e0c632 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new cb84c40b97 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 2ab3289d46 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 5f6ab9de01 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new cec8db47ad 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new fe96cc822a 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7a029b1da9 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 6a00645014 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 4de980b125 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new e18914a184 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new ab7337d1b9 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (dcd8695b8b) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2028 -> 2176 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2408 -> 2488 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27368 -> 27376 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 91008 -> 90180 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7632 -> 7672 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234272 -> 234796 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 212236 -> 218196 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 145 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 143 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4144 -> 4200 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 161 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 17524 -> 14900 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.regression | 2 + 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/error_code-1 | 0 .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/extra-bisect-params | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 10 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 10 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 1 - 10-check_regression/results.regressions | 2 + 10-check_regression/trigger-bisect | 3 + 10-check_regression/trigger-notify | 0 11-update_baseline/console.log | 72 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/notify.sh | 2 +- mail/check-regression-status.txt | 2 +- mail/exe.regression | 2 + manifest.sh | 18 +- results | 2 + results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 235 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 24 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 552356 ++++++------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 546338 ++++++------ results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2984 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3248 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 753596 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 640708 +++++++------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 29751 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 965 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 132 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3247 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 248 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 248 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3870 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 238 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 17 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3144 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3355 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 551277 ++++++------ results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 782360 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30088 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 962 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2986 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3248 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 753596 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 640708 +++++++------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 29751 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 965 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 132 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3359 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 248 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 248 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4278 +- results_id | 2 +- 69 files changed, 2594375 insertions(+), 2755257 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/error_code-1 delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/extra-bisect-params delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff create mode 100644 10-check_regression/results.regressions create mode 100644 10-check_regression/trigger-bisect create mode 100644 10-check_regression/trigger-notify create mode 100644 mail/exe.regression