This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-aarch64-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-aarch64-master-O3_LTO.
discards 526c0bc5 onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 94aa30b8 onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7e2ed562 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 956a12fa onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f0b79df6 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 36b87946 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f3efebc7 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b02ef240 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7ed92810 onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d542c4c3 onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 87071d27 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6ad38311 onsuccess: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a5e95597 onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 833e450b onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5652ca10 onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 39cad2ad onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 4a5b793f force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 0deb153c force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 871f00b9 90: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 80ce4c19 89: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 237bf3ac 88: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 29ab0090 87: force: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a29d87b5 86: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 462b9c85 85: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 448eec9e 84: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f23b2526 83: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 75f87778 82: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2e74bf3c 81: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cfcc0453 80: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards fbf9413f 79: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 9862bc7f 78: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6732019e 77: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8959f7a9 76: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6fe5eb9d 75: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 90d00b03 74: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a589bc9f 73: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 1257 commits discards cc64c1d5 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 285 commits discards 800b365f 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits discards aa4600a8 70: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] discards bbc2c1cc 69: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 0baf7fcd 68: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 454 commits discards 7bfbec25 67: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 216 commits discards 4de2a17a 66: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 391 commits discards f2ff3dc1 65: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 159 commits discards 18803fc1 64: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 487 commits discards 01843363 63: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 711 commits discards 9d8e161c 62: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 79eb378c 61: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 45bb1ab8 60: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards ced46dc0 59: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 65c33661 58: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f242dd18 57: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b1ba7c10 56: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards f2088430 55: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 4ec91f06 54: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc: [...] discards 00ee7c1a 53: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -5% [...] discards c7b12a98 52: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 1ad87a72 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 72b39248 50: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 33738994 49: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 306abee5 48: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/llvm [...] discards c850ad69 47: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c939b6fe 46: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 692bc86a 45: onsuccess: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII speeds up by -4% [...] discards 11b7854c 44: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 411cd6e8 43: onsuccess: #509: 1: [TCWG CI] 470.lbm speeds up by -11% a [...] discards 3c2c79ce 42: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards c66fb41d 41: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards dcb5a7bc 40: onsuccess: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] discards e06f43f1 39: onsuccess: #502: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b223e1f8 38: onsuccess: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng speeds up by -5% [...] discards b6429a90 37: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc run OK after binuti [...] discards 355bae02 36: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits discards 7db9fd40 35: force: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to run after wor [...] discards aaf42da5 34: force: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 191 commits discards 98012793 33: onsuccess: #493: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a39be367 32: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e235af45 31: onsuccess: #490: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0882b3ff 30: onsuccess: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f885ce57 29: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a45b0776 28: onsuccess: #486: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards bec5d336 27: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c7ce2f64 26: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4560df5e 25: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a31d5572 24: onsuccess: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1b44d82e 23: onsuccess: #470: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK [...] discards 3098cf3d 22: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c37f1039 21: onsuccess: #468: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ddf2fb4e 20: onsuccess: #466: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 6c9cfb07 19: onsuccess: #464: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 125 commits discards 283873f6 18: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build afte [...] discards 40bcc071 17: force: #462: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 95 commits discards 74a1c3c8 16: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-16-init [...] discards ff66feac 15: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 117 commits discards 1c87bb65 14: onsuccess: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b21644fa 13: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] discards 9bf69cb3 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 31fa8a70 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 667fb32e 10: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 40a3b66e 9: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/glibc [...] discards 16d3e28c 8: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/gl [...] discards 552789aa 7: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc-llvm: 1 discards 406dd14d Initial empty repository new a7da1508 init: #447: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_c [...] new a55ddd07 8: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/gl [...] new b0dadbce 9: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/glibc [...] new 4dbcb084 10: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new aa79ffbf 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new b5e6bf78 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 2c01f20e 13: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] new dfce80b7 14: onsuccess: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a5f30c76 15: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 117 commits new a4ab9775 16: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-16-init [...] new 7ac9ab5f 17: force: #462: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 95 commits new d589c4c3 18: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build afte [...] new 7c89485d 19: onsuccess: #464: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 125 commits new bed639bf 20: onsuccess: #466: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 37d8522d 21: onsuccess: #468: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d803997a 22: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0a13731a 23: onsuccess: #470: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK [...] new c5be9cba 24: onsuccess: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4b115824 25: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 28ffe3ed 26: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b89d3da9 27: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 54fd4952 28: onsuccess: #486: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 96d70479 29: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 895c0539 30: onsuccess: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 062d2523 31: onsuccess: #490: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3ec820f6 32: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a5d00c00 33: onsuccess: #493: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f702f361 34: force: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 191 commits new 221ef908 35: force: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to run after wor [...] new 802d7220 36: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits new 3c544d02 37: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc run OK after binuti [...] new 340edff1 38: onsuccess: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng speeds up by -5% [...] new 9546800b 39: onsuccess: #502: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8cdbb95f 40: onsuccess: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] new bfccee76 41: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new c6f46446 42: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new fdf261cd 43: onsuccess: #509: 1: [TCWG CI] 470.lbm speeds up by -11% a [...] new 24efe46d 44: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6e605ac6 45: onsuccess: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII speeds up by -4% [...] new 3e8c8ad3 46: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new df06fcb2 47: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b33e3919 48: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/llvm [...] new 7876a8ff 49: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new d6af9eeb 50: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 4f4e6f15 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new ea5074b1 52: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new ac047d86 53: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -5% [...] new c407490d 54: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc: [...] new 7c1b10d6 55: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 718cbf4c 56: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 18882cb9 57: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a5c3fd59 58: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d92400fc 59: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0058c919 60: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0050387f 61: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 12587df1 62: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ef2050b5 63: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 711 commits new 1bdc71dd 64: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 487 commits new 6a5db740 65: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 159 commits new c1683c3e 66: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 391 commits new 78a22e25 67: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 216 commits new f2169493 68: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 454 commits new 612828a6 69: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench slowed down by 5% a [...] new 15abbe5d 70: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] new 9bfe4fe8 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits new 59e9f8be 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 285 commits new 2a7c2fc9 73: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 1257 commits new aafcabf7 74: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d3d9d144 75: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 26f0aa34 76: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d2585709 77: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 26f2b204 78: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new bae71f9f 79: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9e38567c 80: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ce64fd20 81: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 13426686 82: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8dbc5aba 83: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new eb3921da 84: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c08add3f 85: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 09f9659e 86: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3e576545 87: force: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 238ead5c 88: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 136d7573 89: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new bd3842a4 90: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 01318481 force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new 933a7547 force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new eb59f9a5 onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 59024b30 onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 48dd637c onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new aa005e77 onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c287fd33 onsuccess: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 553fd6e1 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4e3dfd4a onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d8e499cc onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0ed77707 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 85638367 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1b3b1e14 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new efc13120 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4c9c900e onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 57c5dc35 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2c23e0da onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c59a15e9 onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (526c0bc5) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: