This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards d5846c4ccd6 118: onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 9975ee483bb 117: onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards dba72ac93c7 116: force: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 6cf482ae2ce 115: onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 344bbfcbbf0 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 6c19358cc68 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 0743362ee3d 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 3b40da41516 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 01d2f70eab7 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 637346b73b6 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 6defbf97c11 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 13983d42da1 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 16ccc8ae052 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards c6bb23fe83a 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards fb1094609b9 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards e7da4704c0e 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards cd394a5ceeb 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 0a93003ac45 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 9f29d546bcb 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards ae0d579f1c3 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 48947d9baa0 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards f98c7e7f97f 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9a45383ce54 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5264aefc20b 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards dc1376c73c6 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards 5fed86a162c 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] discards 95d71b9b16d 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards bfbc0e2d546 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 3bc82387b72 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 6569dd5fb05 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 83b4d6dc8b1 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 74042db2c2d 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards c6d56cc7790 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards c0a127388ff 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16 [...] discards fe8a9ebcde6 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards 09d8457f82c 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] discards e0dadf85420 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 17082575eeb 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 169 [...] discards cee6cb5bebc 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 55400a64c7a 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 3e5d4df45da 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19 [...] discards 7564f8562c2 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards a4086bb5033 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11 [...] discards 6bd8ba89835 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 957a4a5ff39 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards bf4c4192bec 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 8af648095b9 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards fe1be208b00 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards b4df84eae85 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards c505881266e 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 90b44ad1867 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] discards e099a57d1e4 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 4e6b6689374 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 65b9bc6fa42 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8dd6e2686c4 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1404b41dbb3 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 67377665a26 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards 27370ce4df5 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 0e58ba868c6 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 53540da14fa 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards e3820b010de 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] discards 1eaee016815 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards fbcf2031a8d 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 0069617e214 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.900 [...] discards ae410940ec8 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 6badfb9cc03 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 140fbbd303e 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 61d3fbb4b39 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 41fb896c690 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 0662d2d4a21 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards d3c09ad6b51 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards b4645a48bbc 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards 4880b556a3b 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] discards eccf7376d9b 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f1d1502d0ed 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 8cbf28bc7b0 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 4817b4792b4 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.3 [...] discards 818a8186520 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK [...] discards b842ddeb9f0 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 546358d8a31 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 5809fe32820 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards adb98bb7313 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check [...] discards d609e946462 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 5341d0ebaaf 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 27d8469fa32 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 159b610d07d 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 06599e88a91 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 978f549bb8e 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 3502d0631ef 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards cee2bcf2b6d 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 38610636329 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 39fbc3479a2 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards bf0246e257a 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards abd4d99e2ae 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] discards 83696a0bca5 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards 9defa4e8a0b 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] discards 2e985a5e54a 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards 8a04fc24267 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 89823564b16 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards cbed9ec4e05 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards d97c76ca5be 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new fc6af8d14c7 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new 3749008a1bc 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 08be2722cb7 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new 2f6a84ecb43 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 4d197663c8d 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new 4b542ac7c44 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] new cb1b002f91c 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new b8b503f8526 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] new f16513ae673 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new ddc5ed56959 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 929a62fc2fa 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new fb889b441ea 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 215eb52ebc2 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new 60b8fc205b5 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 3e80e02cc26 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 633b7acfe28 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 88122083acb 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 40dec122706 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 74c0f6a36ba 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 09e78f06a3c 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check [...] new 3935a2ecbbe 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 45f986025d7 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 092344b3986 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 222ddc1f564 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK [...] new f51512f9c40 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.3 [...] new 7fbe3be81fd 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new fecc00ca9f6 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new aab8a9ae20a 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5a18faba3da 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] new 10d7b8ec8ff 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new c891a4ccbf6 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 47075ec80eb 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new 16ee960648b 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new e15471d042b 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new a5094f6c810 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 1e7c911d570 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 7de19a5e3f6 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 5dcc4c1e683 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.900 [...] new 3a431f26cfd 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new b99f904b682 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new eef2fe1f2f1 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] new a4f9fde3d1f 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new d25b52781ca 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new 97277310be7 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new e685b123347 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new f998fe46324 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new a2a657f35b9 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new e6ca1aece0d 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 10e59df4958 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ada6998df2d 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new e7caa49d39d 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] new 7fb53ec0e5f 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ea1cf1bb7a5 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new d4631dbae90 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new ed59587eda6 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 6e93d40d48e 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 3733eb4785a 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 1dac6c44550 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 2730dc37d9f 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11 [...] new 928b1e20414 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 4b995bfc424 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19 [...] new 6443a4db397 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new e10cc5c0ca6 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 484e4a6e46b 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 169 [...] new baf99fb8f0e 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new cad68bd0995 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] new 6944ad75d72 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new 3842d5149f9 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16 [...] new ecd13e448e3 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new bf10adb3d14 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new db239f72cc5 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 84b99258d2f 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d785919ade8 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 4f4678cd13c 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new b0606c7bc22 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c265eae0886 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] new 66059ce0dc8 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new a9fcbd1f8a8 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 095b883b08b 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 9b2e548fd9a 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new a84927e5241 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 5262792ceab 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 455d60dfc03 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 38f26eb14dc 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new e0017aa9244 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 39bae8dadcc 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 045ef441618 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 0e9ab45ba63 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 47179336b7f 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 75466bde8f1 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 1a98e47950f 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 48393dec4af 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 81a9ac965fb 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new f239cf79d4f 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 27494c849a3 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 61b966e0de9 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 3824dcafcd4 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new f97c2214744 115: onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new d3a768ebcf8 116: force: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 098ec68c04e 117: onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 04e662bb5f5 118: onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new b7246ecdba0 119: onsuccess: #84: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (d5846c4ccd6) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2336 -> 2376 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2636 -> 2628 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27828 -> 28048 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17796 -> 18052 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90584 -> 91096 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 70232 -> 70032 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8736 -> 7776 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234776 -> 235048 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185576 -> 186076 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 212188 -> 212268 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 179608 -> 178956 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 142 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 140 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4152 -> 4208 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 201 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 18756 -> 17480 bytes .../output-bmk-results/diff-bmk-results.out | 8 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 5 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 5 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 6 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 4 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 72 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 29 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 247 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2762 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 770652 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 760870 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30358 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 936 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3149 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3272 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 754926 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 757890 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30223 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1124 +- results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3253 +- results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/csvs2table-results.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 113 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3242 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 5 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3107 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3263 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 748859 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 751625 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30603 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 1276 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3149 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3272 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 754926 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 757890 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30223 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1124 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3457 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 113 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3748 +- results_id | 2 +- 68 files changed, 3121337 insertions(+), 3100841 deletions(-)